• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单吻合口胃旁路术的长期结局:单机构系列研究的10年随访

Long-Term Outcome of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 10-Year Follow-Up of a Single Institution Series.

作者信息

Makkapati Sneha, Harsha Muvva Sri, Palaniappan Raj

机构信息

Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):216-223. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07624-4. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07624-4
PMID:39661244
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, nutritional status, and resolution of obesity complications of patients following one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients who underwent OAGB in our center between January 2011 and December 2013 was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 152 patients underwent OAGB procedure in our center. Among them, 26 patients were lost to follow up and therefore were excluded from the data analysis. A total of 126 patients completed long-term follow-up of 10 years. The mean age of patients at baseline was 41 ± 12.5 years (range 20-68). At 10-year follow-up, mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 68.9 ± 22.8%. Mean BMI was 29.7 ± 12.9 kg/m, representing an overall BMI reduction of 10.6 kg/m. At 10-year follow-up among the 126 patients, 80% had resolution in DM, 71% had resolution in HTN, and 85% had resolution in OSA. There were no instances of severe malnutrition in the 126 patients in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB is an effective choice of bariatric/metabolic surgery for patients with higher BMI which provides good weight loss in terms of % TWL and % EWL without significant recurrent weight gain or inadequate weight loss with negligible nutritional deficiencies.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)患者的长期疗效、安全性、营养状况及肥胖并发症的缓解情况。

方法

对2011年1月至2013年12月在本中心接受OAGB手术的患者进行回顾性观察研究。

结果

在研究期间,本中心共有152例患者接受了OAGB手术。其中,26例患者失访,因此被排除在数据分析之外。共有126例患者完成了10年的长期随访。患者基线时的平均年龄为41±12.5岁(范围20 - 68岁)。在10年随访时,平均超重减轻(EWL)为68.9±22.8%。平均体重指数(BMI)为29.7±12.9kg/m²,总体BMI降低了10.6kg/m²。在126例患者的10年随访中,80%的糖尿病患者病情缓解,71%的高血压患者病情缓解,85%的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者病情缓解。本研究中的126例患者均未出现严重营养不良的情况。

结论

对于BMI较高的患者,OAGB是一种有效的减肥/代谢手术选择,在总体体重减轻百分比(%TWL)和超重减轻百分比(%EWL)方面能实现良好的体重减轻,且无明显体重反弹或体重减轻不足的情况,营养缺乏可忽略不计。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcome of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 10-Year Follow-Up of a Single Institution Series.单吻合口胃旁路术的长期结局:单机构系列研究的10年随访
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):216-223. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07624-4. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass with Tailored Biliopancreatic Limb Length Formula Relative to Small Bowel Length: Preliminary Results.一种吻合口胃旁路术-迷你胃旁路术,采用与小肠长度相关的定制胆胰肠袢长度公式:初步结果。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3062-3070. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04019-8.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Elderly Patients: Safety and Long-term Outcomes.老年患者中,单吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的比较:安全性及长期疗效
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):570-576. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06421-1. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study.比较单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症:一项 5 年研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Dec;15(12):2038-2044. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
Sleeve Gastrectomy, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a Retrospective Cohort Study.袖状胃切除术、单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)和单吻合口袖状回肠旁路术(SASI)治疗病态肥胖:回顾性队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2021 Apr;31(4):1579-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05159-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Long-Term Weight Loss Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Assessment of 1971 Patients with 5-9-Year Follow-Up.单吻合口胃旁路术的长期减重效果:对1971例患者进行5至9年随访的评估
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):102-111. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07618-2. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
7
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.一种吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的长期随访:减肥和缓解合并症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Investigating the Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Restrictive Procedures.研究初次代谢和减重限制手术后单吻合口胃旁路术的结果。
Obes Surg. 2025 Feb;35(2):525-534. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07628-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
10
LSG vs OAGB: 7-Year Follow-up Data of a Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Outcome Based on BAROS Score.LSG 与 OAGB:基于 BAROS 评分的一项随机对照试验和对比结果的 7 年随访数据。
Obes Surg. 2024 Apr;34(4):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07114-7. Epub 2024 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of metabolic bariatric surgery: a 10-Year multicenter retrospective study in Poland (BARI-10-POL).代谢性减重手术的长期结果:波兰的一项10年多中心回顾性研究(BARI-10-POL)
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 23;410(1):142. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03713-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Definition, Mechanisms and Predictors of Weight Loss Failure After Bariatric Surgery.减肥手术后体重减轻失败的定义、机制及预测因素
J Metab Bariatr Surg. 2022 Dec;11(2):39-48. doi: 10.17476/jmbs.2022.11.2.39. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Ten-year outcome of one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a single-institution series of 940 patients.150cm 胆胰支的单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的 10 年结果:单机构 940 例系列研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Oct;18(10):1228-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.021. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术或单吻合口胃旁路术?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Mar;30(3):614-627. doi: 10.1002/oby.23338. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Acid Reflux Is Common in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.胃旁路术后吻合口后胃食管反流病患者中酸反流很常见。
Obes Surg. 2021 Nov;31(11):4717-4723. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05542-3. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
5
Long-Term Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Experience with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years.单吻合口胃旁路术的长期结果:单中心经验,随访时间至少 10 年。
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3468-3475. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05455-1. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).国际肥胖与代谢外科学会关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的更新立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3251-3278. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Twenty years' experience of laparoscopic 1-anastomosis gastric bypass: surgical risk and long-term results.腹腔镜 1 吻合胃旁路术 20 年经验:手术风险和长期结果。 注:1. 译文保留了原文中的斜体部分,斜体部分在原文中表示英文缩写。2. “20 年经验”中的“20 年”是为了使译文更符合中文表达习惯而添加的,并非原文内容。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 May;17(5):968-975. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Bariatric Surgery Survey 2018: Similarities and Disparities Among the 5 IFSO Chapters.2018 年肥胖手术调查:5 个 IFSO 分会之间的相似性和差异。
Obes Surg. 2021 May;31(5):1937-1948. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass.单吻合口胃旁路术的疗效与风险
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.03.
10
IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study.国际肥胖与代谢外科联合会(IFSO)关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)的共识会议声明:一项改良 Delphi 研究的结果。
Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1625-1634. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04519-y.