• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际肥胖与代谢外科联合会(IFSO)关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)的共识会议声明:一项改良 Delphi 研究的结果。

IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study.

机构信息

Gastro-Obeso-Center Institute of Metabolic Optimization, São Paulo, Brazil.

Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1625-1634. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04519-y.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04519-y
PMID:32152841
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) is currently the third performed primary bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. However, the procedure is hampered by numerous controversies and there is considerable variability in surgical technique, patient selection, and pre- and postoperative care among the surgeons performing this procedure. This paper reports the results of a modified Delphi consensus study organized by the International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO).

METHODS

Fifty-two internationally recognized bariatric experts from 28 countries convened for voting on 90 consensus statements over two rounds to identify those on which consensus could be reached. Inter-voter agreement of ≥ 70% was considered consensus, with voting participation ≥ 80% considered a robust vote.

RESULTS

At least 70% consensus was achieved for 65 of the 90 questions (72.2% of the items), 61 during the first round of voting and an additional four in the second round. Where consensus was reached on a binary agree/disagree or yes/no item, there was agreement with the statement presented in 53 of 56 instances (94.6%). Where consensus was reached on a statement where options favorable versus unfavorable to OAGB-MGB were provided, including statements in which OAGB-MGB was compared to another procedure, the response option favorable to OAGB-MGB was selected in 13 of 23 instances (56.5%).

CONCLUSION

Although there is general agreement that the OAGB-MGB is an effective and usually safe option for the management of patients with obesity or severe obesity, numerous areas of non-consensus remain in its use. Further empirical data are needed.

摘要

背景

单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)目前是全球开展的第三大原发性减重手术。然而,该手术存在诸多争议,不同术者在手术技术、患者选择以及围手术期处理方面存在较大差异。本文报告了国际肥胖与代谢外科学会(IFSO)组织的改良 Delphi 共识研究结果。

方法

来自 28 个国家的 52 名国际知名减重专家参加了两轮投票,对 90 项共识声明进行了投票,以确定能够达成共识的声明。投票者之间的意见一致性≥70%被认为是共识,投票参与率≥80%被认为是可靠的投票。

结果

在 90 个问题中,至少有 65 个(占项目的 72.2%)问题达到了 70%的共识,其中 61 个问题在第一轮投票中达成,另外 4 个问题在第二轮投票中达成。在对赞成/反对或是/否的二元问题达成共识的情况下,有 53 个问题(94.6%)与提出的声明一致。在对赞成 OAGB-MGB 的有利与不利声明达成共识的情况下,包括将 OAGB-MGB 与另一种手术进行比较的声明,有 13 个问题(56.5%)选择了赞成 OAGB-MGB 的回答选项。

结论

尽管普遍认为 OAGB-MGB 是治疗肥胖或重度肥胖患者的有效且通常安全的选择,但在其使用方面仍存在许多存在分歧的领域。需要进一步的实证数据。

相似文献

1
IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study.国际肥胖与代谢外科联合会(IFSO)关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)的共识会议声明:一项改良 Delphi 研究的结果。
Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1625-1634. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04519-y.
2
Patient Selection in One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass-an Expert Modified Delphi Consensus.单吻合口/迷你胃旁路术的患者选择——专家改良 Delphi 共识。
Obes Surg. 2022 Aug;32(8):2512-2524. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06124-7. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
The First Consensus Statement on One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Using a Modified Delphi Approach.关于采用改良德尔菲法的单吻合口/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)的第一份共识声明。
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3070-2.
4
Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement.迷你胃旁路手术-单吻合口胃旁路术(MGB-OAGB)-IFSO 立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2018 May;28(5):1188-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.
5
Current recommendations for procedure selection in class I and II obesity developed by an expert modified Delphi consensus.专家改良 Delphi 共识制定的 I 类和 II 类肥胖症手术选择的现行建议。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 11;14(1):3445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54141-6.
6
Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review.关于单吻合口/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)的非共识领域:叙述性综述。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2453-2463. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Changes in HOMA-IR index levels after bariatric surgery: Comparison of Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch-proximal approach (SADS-p) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB).减重手术后 HOMA-IR 指数水平的变化:单吻合口十二指肠转位近端法(SADS-p)与单吻合口胃旁路-迷你胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)的比较。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
8
IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).国际肥胖与代谢外科学会关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的更新立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3251-3278. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
[From mini gastric bypass to one anastomosis gastric bypass, 20 years of one anastomosis gastric bypass].[从迷你胃旁路手术到单吻合口胃旁路手术,单吻合口胃旁路手术的20年]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 25;25(10):869-874. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220630-00287.
10
Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of 527 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Operations: Retrospective Study.527 例单吻合胃旁路术/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)手术的短期和中期结果:回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):262-267. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3516-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Banded One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 15 Year Results from a Single Centre.带环单吻合胃旁路术:单中心15年结果
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07876-8.
2
Reflux-Related Abnormalities at Distal oesophagus, Gastric Pouch and Anastomotic Site 4 Years After OAGB: Diagnostic Accuracies of Endoscopy Compared to Biopsy and of Symptoms Compared to Both.肥胖症胃旁路手术4年后远端食管、胃囊和吻合口处的反流相关异常:内镜检查与活检的诊断准确性及症状与两者相比的诊断准确性
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr;35(4):1273-1284. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07700-3. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
3
Update on esophageal function, acid and non-acid reflux after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): high-resolution manometry, impedance-24-h pH-metry, and gastroscopy in a prospective mid-term study.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.一种吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
2
Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.超级肥胖患者行单吻合口胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的结局。
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1242-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03673-8.
3
一期吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)后食管功能、酸反流和非酸反流的最新情况:一项前瞻性中期研究中的高分辨率测压、24小时阻抗pH监测及胃镜检查
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2335-2345. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11606-7. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Using artificial intelligence to evaluate adherence to best practices in one anastomosis gastric bypass: first steps in a real-world setting.利用人工智能评估单吻合口胃旁路手术中最佳实践的依从性:真实世界场景中的初步探索。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1945-1951. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11556-0. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
5
Investigating the Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Restrictive Procedures.研究初次代谢和减重限制手术后单吻合口胃旁路术的结果。
Obes Surg. 2025 Feb;35(2):525-534. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07628-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
6
Long-Term Outcome of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 10-Year Follow-Up of a Single Institution Series.单吻合口胃旁路术的长期结局:单机构系列研究的10年随访
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):216-223. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07624-4. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
7
MGB-OAGB International Club-Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus on Controversies in OAGB.MGB-OAGB国际俱乐部——关于OAGB争议的改良德尔菲共识结果
Obes Surg. 2024 Dec;34(12):4541-4554. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07563-0. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
8
Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.单吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术术后贫血发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Today. 2025 May;55(5):652-658. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02946-3. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
9
The length of the biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass.单吻合口胃旁路术中胆胰支的长度
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 14;11:1248744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744. eCollection 2024.
10
Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial.基于全小肠长度与标准胆胰支长度对吻合口胃旁路术行个体化胆胰支长度的效果:TAILOR 随机临床优势试验的 1 年结果。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae219.
Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of 527 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Operations: Retrospective Study.
527 例单吻合胃旁路术/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)手术的短期和中期结果:回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):262-267. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3516-1.
4
MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution.MGB-OAGB:胆胰旁路术胆胰支长度对营养缺乏、体重减轻和合并症缓解的影响。
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3439-3445. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7.
5
One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients.一种吻合(小)胃旁路术现已成为一种成熟的减重手术:对 12807 例患者的系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2956-2967. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3382-x.
6
Comparative study between effect of sleeve gastrectomy and mini-gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus.袖状胃切除术与迷你胃旁路手术对2型糖尿病疗效的比较研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 Nov;12(6):949-954. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
7
LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与改良胃旁路术-全腹腔镜下全胃旷置术3年随访数据:一项随机对照试验
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2820-2828. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3255-3.
8
Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement.迷你胃旁路手术-单吻合口胃旁路术(MGB-OAGB)-IFSO 立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2018 May;28(5):1188-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.
9
One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis.单吻合口胃旁路术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖的Meta分析
Clin Obes. 2018 Jun;8(3):159-169. doi: 10.1111/cob.12246. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
10
Laparoscopic gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comparison of Roux-en-Y versus single anastomosis gastric bypass.腹腔镜胃旁路术治疗 2 型糖尿病: Roux-en-Y 与单吻合口胃旁路术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Apr;14(4):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Jan 4.