文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Qualitative Evaluation of mHealth Implementation for Infectious Disease Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Narrative Review.

作者信息

Greenall-Ota Josephine, Yapa H Manisha, Fox Greg J, Negin Joel

机构信息

Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Science Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia, 61 2 9351 2222.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Dec 13;12:e55189. doi: 10.2196/55189.


DOI:10.2196/55189
PMID:39670953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11660726/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have the potential to improve health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by aiding health workers to strengthen service delivery, as well as by helping patients and communities manage and prevent diseases. It is crucial to understand how best to implement mHealth within already burdened health services to maximally improve health outcomes and sustain the intervention in LMICs. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify key barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of mHealth interventions for infectious diseases in LMICs, drawing on a health systems analysis framework. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist to select qualitative or mixed methods studies reporting on determinants of already implemented infectious disease mHealth interventions in LMICs. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, the Social Sciences Citation Index, and Global Health. We extracted characteristics of the mHealth interventions and implementation experiences, then conducted an analysis of determinants using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases framework. RESULTS: We identified 10,494 titles for screening, among which 20 studies met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 9 studies examined mHealth smartphone apps and 11 examined SMS text messaging interventions. The interventions addressed HIV (n=7), malaria (n=4), tuberculosis (n=4), pneumonia (n=2), dengue (n=1), human papillomavirus (n=1), COVID-19 (n=1), and respiratory illnesses or childhood infectious diseases (n=2), with 2 studies addressing multiple diseases. Within these studies, 10 interventions were intended for use by health workers and the remainder targeted patients, at-risk individuals, or community members. Access to reliable technological resources, familiarity with technology, and training and support were key determinants of implementation. Additional themes included users forgetting to use the mHealth interventions and mHealth intervention designs affecting ease of use. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of the intervention and the capacity of existing health care system infrastructure and resources are 2 key factors affecting the implementation of mHealth interventions. Understanding the interaction between mHealth interventions, their implementation, and health systems will improve their uptake in LMICs.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/e02a09bfa8e8/mhealth-v12-e55189-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/8197da863f2a/mhealth-v12-e55189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/efec4c15116f/mhealth-v12-e55189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/582b5e83d860/mhealth-v12-e55189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/e02a09bfa8e8/mhealth-v12-e55189-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/8197da863f2a/mhealth-v12-e55189-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/efec4c15116f/mhealth-v12-e55189-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/582b5e83d860/mhealth-v12-e55189-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadb/11660726/e02a09bfa8e8/mhealth-v12-e55189-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Qualitative Evaluation of mHealth Implementation for Infectious Disease Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Narrative Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024-12-13

[2]
Barriers to the Use of Mobile Health in Improving Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2019-10-9

[3]
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-3-26

[4]
mHealth Application Areas and Technology Combinations*. A Comparison of Literature from High and Low/Middle Income Countries.

Methods Inf Med. 2017-8-8

[5]
Using mobile phones to improve young people sexual and reproductive health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review to identify barriers, facilitators, and range of mHealth solutions.

Reprod Health. 2021-1-16

[6]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[7]
Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps by Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023-11-8

[8]
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.

Med J Aust. 2020-12

[9]
Effective community-based interventions to prevent and control infectious diseases in urban informal settlements in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Syst Rev. 2024-10-4

[10]
Community health worker-based mobile health (mHealth) approaches for improving management and caregiver knowledge of common childhood infections: A systematic review.

J Glob Health. 2020-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
SMS-based digital health intervention in Rwanda's home-based care program for remote management of COVID-19 cases and contacts: A qualitative study of sustainability and scalability.

Front Digit Health. 2023-1-9

[2]
Implementation and scaling-up of an effective mHealth intervention to increase adherence to triage of HPV-positive women (ATICA study): perceptions of health decision-makers and health-care providers.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023-1-18

[3]
Process evaluation for the adaptation, testing and dissemination of a mobile health platform to support people with HIV and tuberculosis in Irkutsk, Siberia.

BMJ Open. 2022-3-29

[4]
The Influence of Design and Implementation Characteristics on the Use of Maternal Mobile Health Interventions in Kenya: Systematic Literature Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-1-27

[5]
Sustainability of a mobile phone application-based data reporting system in Myanmar's malaria elimination program: a qualitative study.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021-10-18

[6]
Mobile Health (mHealth) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Annu Rev Public Health. 2022-4-5

[7]
Health workers' perspectives of a mobile health tool to improve diagnosis and management of paediatric acute respiratory illnesses in Uganda: a qualitative study.

BMJ Open. 2021-7-19

[8]
Acceptability of a Mobile Phone Support Tool (Call for Life Uganda) for Promoting Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy Among Young Adults in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Exploratory Qualitative Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-6-14

[9]
Mobile health applications for disease screening and treatment support in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review.

Heliyon. 2021-3-31

[10]
'You're only there on the phone'? A qualitative exploration of community, affect and agential capacity in HIV self-testing using a smartphone app.

Sociol Health Illn. 2021-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索