文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在 COVID-19 大流行期间影响医生接受和采用移动医疗应用程序的因素:系统评价。

Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps by Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Health Information Technology and Management, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Nov 8;11:e50419. doi: 10.2196/50419.


DOI:10.2196/50419
PMID:37938873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10666016/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the provision of and access to health care have been uniquely challenging, particularly during lockdowns or when dealing with COVID-19 cases. Health care professionals have had to provide patients with the necessary health care. However, delivering health care services while reducing face-to-face interaction puts an immense strain on health systems that are already overburdened. Against this backdrop, it is now more critical than ever to ensure the accessibility of health care services. Such access has been made increasingly available through mobile health (mHealth) apps. These apps have the potential to significantly improve health care outcomes and expectations and address some of the challenges confronting health care systems worldwide. Despite the advantages of mHealth, its acceptance and adoption remain low. Hence, health care organizations must consider the perceptions and opinions of physicians if the technology is to be successfully implemented. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to explore and synthesize the scientific literature on the factors influencing the acceptance and adoption of mHealth among physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A systematic review of the studies published between March 2020 and December 2022 was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest databases. The database search yielded an initial sample of 455 potential publications for analysis, of which 9 (2%) met the inclusion criteria. The methodology of this review was based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). RESULTS: The factors influencing mHealth acceptance and adoption by physicians were divided into perceived barriers and perceived facilitators, which were further grouped into the following 3 major thematic categories: technological, individual, and organizational barriers and facilitators, respectively. The technological barriers were accessibility, technical issues, usefulness, and data management; individual barriers were perceived patient barriers, time and workload pressure, technical literacy, knowledge of mHealth, and peer support; and organizational barriers were financial factors, management support and engagement, data security, telemonitoring policy, and collaboration. The technological facilitators of uptake were technical factors, clinical usefulness, and data management; individual facilitators were patient-related care, intrinsic motivation, collaboration, and data sharing (individual); and organizational facilitators were workflow-related determinants, organizational financial support, recommendation of mHealth services, and evidence-based guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarized the evidence on the factors influencing mHealth acceptance and adoption by physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main findings highlighted the importance of addressing organizational readiness to support physicians with adequate resources, shifting the focus from technological to patient-centered factors, and the seamless integration of mHealth into routine practice during and beyond the pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022356125; https://tinyurl.com/2mmhn5yu.

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医疗保健的提供和获取面临着独特的挑战,尤其是在封锁期间或应对 COVID-19 病例时。医疗保健专业人员必须为患者提供必要的医疗保健。然而,在减少面对面接触的同时提供医疗保健服务,给已经负担过重的医疗系统带来了巨大的压力。在这种背景下,确保医疗保健服务的可及性比以往任何时候都更加重要。移动医疗 (mHealth) 应用程序使这种可及性变得更加容易。这些应用程序有可能显著改善医疗保健结果和预期,并解决全球医疗保健系统面临的一些挑战。尽管 mHealth 具有优势,但它的接受度和采用率仍然很低。因此,如果要成功实施该技术,医疗保健组织必须考虑医生的看法和意见。 目的:本系统评价的目的是探索和综合 COVID-19 大流行期间影响医生接受和采用 mHealth 的科学文献。 方法:使用 MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase 和 ProQuest 数据库对 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月期间发表的研究进行了系统评价。数据库搜索产生了 455 篇可供分析的初步潜在出版物,其中 9 篇 (2%) 符合纳入标准。本综述的方法基于 PRISMA (系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)。 结果:影响医生接受和采用 mHealth 的因素分为感知障碍和感知促进因素,进一步分为以下 3 个主要主题类别:技术、个人和组织障碍和促进因素。技术障碍包括可及性、技术问题、有用性和数据管理;个人障碍包括感知患者障碍、时间和工作量压力、技术素养、对 mHealth 的了解和同行支持;组织障碍包括财务因素、管理支持和参与、数据安全、远程监测政策和协作。技术促进因素包括技术因素、临床有用性和数据管理;个人促进因素包括与患者相关的护理、内在动机、协作和数据共享 (个人);组织促进因素包括与工作流程相关的决定因素、组织财务支持、推荐 mHealth 服务和循证指南。 结论:本综述总结了 COVID-19 大流行期间影响医生接受和采用 mHealth 的因素的证据。主要发现强调了医疗机构必须做好准备,为医生提供充足的资源,从技术因素转向以患者为中心的因素,以及在大流行期间和之后将 mHealth 无缝整合到常规实践中的重要性。 试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42022356125;https://tinyurl.com/2mmhn5yu。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/e168026fadc2/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/988bb95b5576/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/98265590ed05/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/e168026fadc2/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/988bb95b5576/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/98265590ed05/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa0c/10666016/e168026fadc2/mhealth_v11i1e50419_fig3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps by Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023-11-8

[2]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[3]
Sociotechnical Factors Affecting Patients' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-5-5

[4]
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[5]
mHealth Strategies Related to HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Access: Systematic Literature Review, Technology Prospecting of Patent Databases, and Systematic Search on App Stores.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-2-16

[6]
Facilitators of and Barriers to Accessing Hospital Medical Specialty Telemedicine Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-7-10

[7]
The Use of mHealth Apps for the Assessment and Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-10-4

[8]
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[9]
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21

[10]
Evaluating Effectiveness of mHealth Apps for Older Adults With Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-6-17

引用本文的文献

[1]
Home-Based mHealth Platform (Active-Feet) for Children With Idiopathic Toe Walking: Design, Development, and Acceptability Study.

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025-8-26

[2]
Exploring primary care doctors' perceptions and experiences in adopting mHealth with patients: A qualitative study.

Digit Health. 2025-6-2

[3]
Perceived acceptability, barriers and enablers in implementing mobile phone messaging-based message-framing intervention for improved maternal and newborn care in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

BMJ Open. 2025-5-16

[4]
Exploring the Use of Mobile Health Applications in Palestinian Community Pharmacy Practice.

Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2025-3-1

[5]
Insights Into How mHealth Applications Could Be Introduced Into Standard Hypertension Care in Germany: Qualitative Study With German Cardiologists and General Practitioners.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025-3-28

[6]
Family Physicians' Use of, Barriers to, and Attitudes Toward Remote Diagnosis and Treatment in China: A National Web-Based Survey.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-2-23

[7]
How healthcare providers' IT identity is formed and how it affects the use of telemonitoring: a qualitative interview study in COPD care.

BMJ Open. 2025-2-17

[8]
Physicians' acceptance and adoption of mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model.

Health Inf Manag. 2024-12-11

[9]
Functions of Smartphone Apps and Wearable Devices Promoting Physical Activity: Six-Month Longitudinal Study on Japanese-Speaking Adults.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024-12-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Understanding Post-Adoption Behavioral Intentions of Mobile Health Service Users: An Empirical Study during COVID-19.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-2-22

[2]
eHealth: A Survey of Architectures, Developments in mHealth, Security Concerns and Solutions.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-10-11

[3]
Monitoring Symptoms of COVID-19: Review of Mobile Apps.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022-6-1

[4]
Capacity and Readiness Assessment of Healthcare Facilities for Digital Health Interventions Against Tuberculosis and HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Front Digit Health. 2022-2-28

[5]
An mHealth Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence and Health Outcomes Among Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-3-9

[6]
Patient Digital Health Technologies to Support Primary Care Across Clinical Contexts: Survey of Primary Care Providers, Behavioral Health Consultants, and Nurses.

JMIR Form Res. 2022-2-25

[7]
Telehealth and Artificial Intelligence Insights into Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Healthcare (Basel). 2022-2-18

[8]
Demand for Mobile Health in Developing Countries During COVID-19: Vietnamese's Perspectives from Different Age Groups and Health Conditions.

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022-2-2

[9]
Patients' and Providers' Perspectives on and Needs of Telemonitoring to Support Clinical Management and Self-care of People at High Risk for Preeclampsia: Qualitative Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2022-2-7

[10]
A COVID-19 disruption: The great acceleration of digitally planned and transformed behaviors in Thailand.

Technol Soc. 2022-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索