• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模火鸡养殖中农场生物安全与动物福利指标之间的相关性。

The correlation between on-farm biosecurity and animal welfare indices in large-scale turkey production.

作者信息

Kovács László, Klaucke Christopher René, Farkas Máté, Bakony Mikolt, Jurkovich Viktor, Könyves László

机构信息

Department of Animal Hygiene, Herd Health and Mobile Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Digital Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2025 Jan;104(1):104598. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104598. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2024.104598
PMID:39671859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11699218/
Abstract

This research aimed to determine the association between biosecurity and animal welfare measures in large-scale fattening turkey farms in Hungary. Large-scale farms raising male fattening turkeys across Hungary were contacted, with 24 agreeing to participate. The Biocheck.UGent questionnaire was used to evaluate biosecurity measures, and Animal Welfare Indicators (AWIN) protocol was used for welfare assessment. The association between biosecurity and welfare indicators was investigated by correlation testing and prediction accuracy using random forest classification. The areas of biosecurity that were shown to be closely linked to the welfare index were the organization of the farm (farm management, supply of materials), the control and hygienic measures implemented between farm structures, cleaning and disinfection measures on the farm, and control and hygienic measures implemented in the case of farm workers and visitors upon entrance and exit. The study highlighted the link between biosecurity and animal welfare in turkey production, concluding that enhanced biosecurity measures correlate with better welfare outcomes and emphasizing the need for comprehensive and well-implemented biosecurity protocols.

摘要

本研究旨在确定匈牙利大型育肥火鸡养殖场生物安全与动物福利措施之间的关联。研究联系了匈牙利各地饲养雄性育肥火鸡的大型养殖场,其中24个同意参与。使用Biocheck.UGent问卷评估生物安全措施,并采用动物福利指标(AWIN)协议进行福利评估。通过相关性测试和随机森林分类的预测准确性来研究生物安全与福利指标之间的关联。与福利指数密切相关的生物安全领域包括养殖场的组织(农场管理、物资供应)、养殖场建筑之间实施的控制和卫生措施、养殖场的清洁和消毒措施,以及农场工人和访客进出时实施的控制和卫生措施。该研究突出了火鸡生产中生物安全与动物福利之间的联系,得出结论认为加强生物安全措施与更好的福利结果相关,并强调需要全面且实施良好的生物安全协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/fb2a76c2771d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/07df9e45aeb6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/b6a1ba232dd0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/0e0636df7495/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/5c5b86f576b7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/9797f324a5a9/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/fb2a76c2771d/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/07df9e45aeb6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/b6a1ba232dd0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/0e0636df7495/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/5c5b86f576b7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/9797f324a5a9/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed09/11699218/fb2a76c2771d/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
The correlation between on-farm biosecurity and animal welfare indices in large-scale turkey production.大规模火鸡养殖中农场生物安全与动物福利指标之间的相关性。
Poult Sci. 2025 Jan;104(1):104598. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104598. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Development and use of Biocheck.UGent™ scoring system to quantify biosecurity in conventional indoor (turkey, duck, breeder) and free-range (layer and broiler) poultry farms.开发和使用 Biocheck.UGent™ 评分系统来量化常规室内(火鸡、鸭、种禽)和自由放养(蛋鸡和肉鸡)家禽养殖场的生物安全。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Sep;230:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106288. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Differences in prevalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkey flocks (Meleagris gallopavo).雄性和雌性火鸡群(Meleagris gallopavo)中福利指标流行率的差异。
Poult Sci. 2019 Apr 1;98(4):1568-1574. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey534.
4
Biocheck.UGent: a quantitative tool to measure biosecurity at broiler farms and the relationship with technical performances and antimicrobial use.根特大学的生物检测:一种衡量肉鸡场生物安全的定量工具及其与技术性能和抗菌药物使用的关系。
Poult Sci. 2014 Nov;93(11):2740-51. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04002. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
5
Associations between on-farm welfare measures and slaughterhouse data in commercial flocks of turkey hens (Meleagris gallopavo).商业火鸡母鸡(Meleagris gallopavo)养殖场福利措施与屠宰场数据之间的关联。
Poult Sci. 2020 Sep;99(9):4123-4131. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
6
An epidemiological analysis of the level of biosecurity and animal welfare on pig farms in Japan and their effect on the use of veterinary antimicrobials.日本猪场生物安全水平与动物福利及其对兽用抗菌药物使用影响的流行病学分析
J Vet Med Sci. 2018 Dec 11;80(12):1853-1860. doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0287. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Quantitative assessment of biosecurity in broiler farms using Biocheck.UGent in Central Luzon, Philippines.使用 Biocheck.UGent 对菲律宾中吕宋的肉鸡养殖场进行生物安全的定量评估。
Poult Sci. 2020 Jun;99(6):3047-3059. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
Assessing the impact of biosecurity practices and animal welfare in small-scale mountain dairy farming.评估小规模山地奶牛养殖中生物安全措施和动物福利的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 10;14(1):13294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63841-y.
9
Reliability, practicability and farmers' acceptance of an animal welfare assessment protocol for broiler chickens and turkeys.肉鸡和火鸡动物福利评估方案的可靠性、实用性和农民接受度。
Poult Sci. 2024 Oct;103(10):103900. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103900. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
On-farm biosecurity as perceived by professionals visiting Swedish farms.瑞典农场专业访客所认知的农场生物安全措施。
Acta Vet Scand. 2014 May 9;56(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Relation Between Farm Biosecurity Measures and Poultry Production Performances: A Scoping Review.农场生物安全措施与家禽生产性能之间的关系:一项范围综述
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Sep;11(5):e70526. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70526.
2
Avian Influenza Clade 2.3.4.4b: Global Impact and Summary Analysis of Vaccine Trials.禽流感2.3.4.4b分支:全球影响及疫苗试验综述分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 24;13(5):453. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050453.
3
Biosecurity Implications, Transmission Routes and Modes of Economically Important Diseases in Domestic Fowl and Turkey.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and use of Biocheck.UGent™ scoring system to quantify biosecurity in conventional indoor (turkey, duck, breeder) and free-range (layer and broiler) poultry farms.开发和使用 Biocheck.UGent™ 评分系统来量化常规室内(火鸡、鸭、种禽)和自由放养(蛋鸡和肉鸡)家禽养殖场的生物安全。
Prev Vet Med. 2024 Sep;230:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106288. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
2
Monitoring biosecurity in poultry production: an overview of databases reporting biosecurity compliance from seven European countries.家禽生产中的生物安全监测:来自七个欧洲国家的生物安全合规报告数据库概述
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 15;10:1231377. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1231377. eCollection 2023.
3
家禽和火鸡中经济重要性疾病的生物安全影响、传播途径和模式
Vet Sci. 2025 Apr 21;12(4):391. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12040391.
4
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Commensal Isolates from Turkeys in Hungarian Poultry Farms Between 2022 and 2023.2022年至2023年匈牙利家禽养殖场火鸡共生分离株的抗菌药敏谱
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Mar 16;14(3):305. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030305.
Can Improved Farm Biosecurity Reduce the Need for Antimicrobials in Food Animals? A Scoping Review.
改善农场生物安全措施能否减少食用动物对抗微生物药物的需求?一项范围综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 11;12(5):893. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050893.
4
Biosecurity and antimicrobial use in broiler farms across nine European countries: toward identifying farm-specific options for reducing antimicrobial usage.肉鸡养殖场的生物安全和抗菌药物使用情况:在九个欧洲国家:寻找减少抗菌药物使用的具体农场选项。
Epidemiol Infect. 2022 Dec 27;151:e13. doi: 10.1017/S0950268822001960.
5
What is a biosecurity measure? A definition proposal for animal production and linked processing operations.什么是生物安全措施?关于动物生产及相关加工操作的定义提案。
One Health. 2022 Sep 16;15:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100433. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Economic analysis of biosecurity adoption in dairy farming: evidence from Ireland.经济分析在爱尔兰奶业生物安全采纳中的应用
J Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;100(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac218.
7
Assessing Biosecurity Compliance in Poultry Farms: A Survey in a Densely Populated Poultry Area in North East Italy.评估家禽养殖场的生物安全合规情况:意大利东北部人口密集家禽养殖区的一项调查
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 30;12(11):1409. doi: 10.3390/ani12111409.
8
A Systematic Review on the Link between Animal Welfare and Antimicrobial Use in Captive Animals.关于圈养动物的动物福利与抗菌药物使用之间联系的系统综述。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;12(8):1025. doi: 10.3390/ani12081025.
9
Evaluation of Welfare in Commercial Turkey Flocks of Both Sexes Using the Transect Walk Method.使用样带行走法评估商业性雌雄混养火鸡群的福利状况。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 13;11(11):3253. doi: 10.3390/ani11113253.
10
Biosecurity in pig farms: a review.猪场生物安全:综述
Porcine Health Manag. 2021 Jan 4;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00181-z.