Vougat Ngom Ronald, Jajere Saleh Mohammed, Watsop Hippolyte Mekuiko, Tanyienow Akenghe
Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon.
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Sep;11(5):e70526. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70526.
The poultry sector represents an essential component of agriculture worldwide. Its meat is one of the most consumed meat products, providing consumers with high-quality, nutritious and affordable protein. However, intensification of poultry production to meet the growing demand has led to the persistence of infectious diseases, which remains a serious constraint with negative impacts. To mitigate this issue, biosecurity is used as the main strategy. Unfortunately, farmers' perception of biosecurity benefits is reducing its effective implementation in poultry farms. Showing the possible positive impact of biosecurity on livestock performance could be a key reason that could drive improving biosecurity implementation by farmers. Following the PRISMA-Sc (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) method, this study aimed to map existing literature on the association between farm biosecurity or management measures and poultry production performances. The search was performed in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Agricola) with no time and geographic restriction.
From the 2,721 records identified during the search, only 13 were finally included in this review. The majority concerned broilers (n = 11) and were conducted across the world. Many of the included studies showed a positive correlation between biosecurity and production performances, with cleaning and disinfection and weight gain as the associated main factors. For instance, the positive associations included overall biosecurity and average mortality in the first week/average performance index; housing system and weight gain/feed intake/feed conversion ratio/performance index/live body weights; frequency of waterline sanitation and general performance; and adoption of biosecurity and number of eggs/flock in 3 months.
Further studies need to be conducted to provide evidence reinforcing the adoption and implementation of farm biosecurity measures for improving animal production performances.
家禽产业是全球农业的重要组成部分。禽肉是消费最为广泛的肉类产品之一,为消费者提供了优质、营养且价格合理的蛋白质。然而,为满足不断增长的需求而强化家禽生产导致传染病持续存在,这仍然是一个具有负面影响的严重制约因素。为缓解这一问题,生物安全被用作主要策略。不幸的是,农民对生物安全效益的认知正在降低其在家禽养殖场的有效实施。展示生物安全对家畜生产性能可能产生的积极影响可能是推动农民改善生物安全实施的一个关键因素。遵循PRISMA-Sc(系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述首选报告项目)方法,本研究旨在梳理关于农场生物安全或管理措施与家禽生产性能之间关联的现有文献。检索在四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、科学网和农业与生命科学数据库)中进行,没有时间和地理限制。
在检索过程中识别出的2721条记录中,最终仅有13条被纳入本综述。大多数研究涉及肉鸡(n = 11),且在全球范围内开展。许多纳入研究表明生物安全与生产性能之间存在正相关,清洁消毒和体重增加是相关的主要因素。例如,正相关关系包括总体生物安全与第一周平均死亡率/平均性能指数;饲养系统与体重增加/采食量/饲料转化率/性能指数/活体体重;水线卫生频率与总体性能;以及采用生物安全措施与三个月内的产蛋数/鸡群数量。
需要开展进一步研究,以提供证据支持采用和实施农场生物安全措施来提高动物生产性能。