• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向流行病学研究中的稳健因果推断:在右心导管插入术数据中应用双重交叉拟合全最大似然估计法

Towards Robust Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research: Employing Double Cross-fit TMLE in Right Heart Catheterization Data.

作者信息

Mondol Momenul Haque, Karim Mohammad Ehsanul

机构信息

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Statistics, University of Barishal, Barishal, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae447.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae447
PMID:39673761
Abstract

Within epidemiological research, estimating treatment effects from observational data presents notable challenges. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) emerges as a robust method, addressing these challenges by accurately modeling treatment effects. This approach uniquely combines the precision of correctly specified models with the versatility of data-adaptive, flexible machine learning algorithms. Despite its effectiveness, TMLE's integration of complex algorithms can introduce bias and under-coverage. This issue is addressed through the Double Cross-fit TMLE (DC-TMLE) approach, enhancing accuracy and reducing biases inherent in observational studies. However, DC-TMLE's potential remains underexplored in epidemiological research, primarily due to the lack of comprehensive methodological guidance and the complexity of its computational implementation. Recognizing this gap, our paper contributes a detailed, reproducible guide for implementing DC-TMLE in R, aimed specifically at epidemiological applications. We demonstrate the utility of this method using an openly available clinical dataset, underscoring its relevance and adaptability for robust epidemiological analysis. This guide aims to facilitate broader adoption of DC-TMLE in epidemiological studies, promoting more accurate and reliable treatment effect estimations in observational research.

摘要

在流行病学研究中,从观察性数据估计治疗效果面临着显著挑战。靶向最大似然估计(TMLE)作为一种稳健的方法应运而生,它通过准确地对治疗效果进行建模来应对这些挑战。这种方法独特地将正确设定模型的精度与数据自适应、灵活的机器学习算法的通用性结合起来。尽管TMLE很有效,但它对复杂算法的整合可能会引入偏差和覆盖不足的问题。双交叉拟合TMLE(DC-TMLE)方法解决了这个问题,提高了准确性并减少了观察性研究中固有的偏差。然而,DC-TMLE在流行病学研究中的潜力仍未得到充分探索,主要是由于缺乏全面的方法学指导以及其计算实现的复杂性。认识到这一差距,我们的论文提供了一份在R中实现DC-TMLE的详细、可重现的指南,特别针对流行病学应用。我们使用一个公开可用的临床数据集展示了这种方法的实用性,强调了其在稳健的流行病学分析中的相关性和适应性。本指南旨在促进DC-TMLE在流行病学研究中的更广泛应用,推动观察性研究中更准确、可靠的治疗效果估计。

相似文献

1
Towards Robust Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research: Employing Double Cross-fit TMLE in Right Heart Catheterization Data.迈向流行病学研究中的稳健因果推断:在右心导管插入术数据中应用双重交叉拟合全最大似然估计法
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae447.
2
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
3
Guidelines and Best Practices for the Use of Targeted Maximum Likelihood and Machine Learning When Estimating Causal Effects of Exposures on Time-To-Event Outcomes.估计暴露因素对事件发生时间结局的因果效应时使用靶向最大似然法和机器学习的指南与最佳实践
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70034. doi: 10.1002/sim.70034.
4
Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health and epidemiological studies: a systematic review.靶向极大似然估计在公共卫生和流行病学研究中的应用:系统评价。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;86:34-48.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
5
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
6
Transfering Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference into Sports Science.将用于因果推断的靶向最大似然估计应用于体育科学。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;24(8):1060. doi: 10.3390/e24081060.
7
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial.针对二项治疗的目标极大似然估计:教程。
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2530-2546. doi: 10.1002/sim.7628. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in survival and competing risks analysis.生存和竞争风险分析中因果推断的靶向极大似然估计。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2024 Jan;30(1):4-33. doi: 10.1007/s10985-022-09576-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
Demystifying Statistical Inference When Using Machine Learning in Causal Research.在因果研究中使用机器学习时揭开统计推断的神秘面纱。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 15;192(9):1545-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab200.
10
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.

引用本文的文献

1
How Effective Are Machine Learning and Doubly Robust Estimators in Incorporating High-Dimensional Proxies to Reduce Residual Confounding?在纳入高维代理变量以减少残余混杂方面,机器学习和双重稳健估计器的效果如何?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 May;34(5):e70155. doi: 10.1002/pds.70155.