Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, Royal (DICK) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 123 W Franklin St, Room 2107, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 2;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01581-y.
The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) measures adherence to the dietary pattern presented by the EAT-Lancet Commission, which aligns health and sustainability targets. There is a need to understand how PHDI scores correlate with dietary greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and how this differs from the carbon footprints of scores on established dietary recommendations. The objectives of this study were to compare how the PHDI, Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) relate to (a) dietary GHGE and (b) to examine the influence of PHDI food components on dietary GHGE.
We used life cycle assessment data from the Database of Food Recall Impacts on the Environment for Nutrition and Dietary Studies to calculate the mean dietary GHGE of 8,128 adult participants in the 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Poisson regression was used to estimate the association of (a) quintiles of diet score and (b) standardized dietary index Z-scores with dietary GHGE for PHDI, HEI-2015, and DASH scores. In secondary analyses, we used Poisson regression to assess the influence of individual PHDI component scores on dietary GHGE.
We found that higher dietary quality on all three indices was correlated with lower dietary GHGE. The magnitude of the dietary quality-dietary GHGE relationship was larger for PHDI [-0.4, 95% CI (-0.5, -0.3) kg CO equivalents per one standard deviation change] and for DASH [-0.5, (-0.4, -0.6) kg CO-equivalents] than for HEI-2015 [-0.2, (-0.2, -0.3) kg CO-equivalents]. When examining PHDI component scores, we found that diet-related GHGE were driven largely by red and processed meat intake.
Improved dietary quality has the potential to lower the emissions impacts of US diets. Future efforts to promote healthy, sustainable diets could apply the recommendations of the established DASH guidelines as well as the new guidance provided by the PHDI to increase their environmental benefits.
行星健康饮食指数(PHDI)衡量的是对 EAT-Lancet 委员会提出的饮食模式的遵守程度,该模式符合健康和可持续性目标。需要了解 PHDI 评分与饮食温室气体排放(GHGE)的相关性,以及这与既定饮食建议的碳足迹有何不同。本研究的目的是比较 PHDI、健康饮食指数-2015(HEI-2015)和停止高血压的饮食方法(DASH)如何与(a)饮食 GHGE 相关,以及(b)检查 PHDI 食物成分对饮食 GHGE 的影响。
我们使用来自数据库的生命周期评估数据食物召回对营养和饮食研究的环境影响来计算 2015-2016 年和 2017-2018 年国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)周期中 8128 名成年参与者的平均饮食 GHGE。泊松回归用于估计(a)饮食评分五分位数和(b)标准化饮食指数 Z 分数与 PHDI、HEI-2015 和 DASH 评分的饮食 GHGE 之间的关联。在二次分析中,我们使用泊松回归评估单个 PHDI 成分分数对饮食 GHGE 的影响。
我们发现,所有三个指数上的饮食质量越高,与饮食 GHGE 越低相关。PHDI [ -0.4,95%CI(-0.5,-0.3)kg CO 当量/标准差变化]和 DASH [ -0.5,(-0.4,-0.6)kg CO 当量] 的饮食质量与饮食 GHGE 的相关性大于 HEI-2015 [ -0.2,(-0.2,-0.3)kg CO 当量]。在检查 PHDI 成分分数时,我们发现与饮食相关的 GHGE 主要受红色和加工肉类摄入的驱动。
提高饮食质量有可能降低美国饮食的排放影响。未来促进健康、可持续饮食的努力可以应用既定 DASH 指南的建议以及 PHDI 提供的新指导,以增加其环境效益。