Thomsen Mirja, Ott Fabian, Loens Sebastian, Kilic-Berkmen Gamze, Tan Ai Huey, Lim Shen-Yang, Lohmann Ebba, Schröder Kaja M, Ipsen Lea, Nothacker Lena A, Welzel Linn, Rudnik Alexandra S, Hinrichs Frauke, Odorfer Thorsten, Zeuner Kirsten E, Schumann Friederike, Kühn Andrea A, Zittel Simone, Moeller Marius, Pfister Robert, Kamm Christoph, Lang Anthony E, Tay Yi Wen, Vidailhet Marie, Roze Emmanuel, Perlmutter Joel S, Feuerstein Jeanne S, Fung Victor S C, Chang Florence, Barbano Richard L, Bellows Steven, Shukla Aparna A Wagle, Espay Alberto J, LeDoux Mark S, Berman Brian D, Reich Stephen, Deik Andres, Franke Andre, Wittig Michael, Franzenburg Sören, Volkmann Jens, Brüggemann Norbert, Jinnah H A, Bäumer Tobias, Klein Christine, Busch Hauke, Lohmann Katja
Institute of Neurogenetics, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Medical Systems Biology Division, Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 5:2024.12.02.24316741. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.02.24316741.
Dystonia is one of the most prevalent movement disorders, characterized by significant clinical and etiological heterogeneity. Despite considerable heritability (~25%) and the identification of several disease-linked genes, the etiology in most patients remains elusive. Moreover, understanding the correlations between clinical manifestation and genetic variants has become increasingly complex. To comprehensively unravel dystonia's genetic spectrum, we performed exome sequencing on 1,924 dystonia patients [40.3% male, 92.9% White, 93.2% isolated dystonia, median age at onset (AAO) 33 years], including 1,895 index patients, who were previously genetically unsolved. The sample was mainly based on two dystonia registries (DysTract and the Dystonia Coalition). Further, 72 additional patients of Asian ethnicity, mainly from Malaysia, were also included. We prioritized patients with negative genetic prescreening, early AAO, positive family history, and multisite involvement of dystonia. Rare variants in genes previously linked to dystonia (=405) were examined. Variants were confirmed via Sanger sequencing, and segregation analysis was performed when possible. We identified 137 distinct likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants (according to ACMG criteria) across 51 genes in 163/1,924 patients [42.9% male, 85.9% White, 68.7% isolated dystonia, median AAO 19 years]. This included 153/1,895 index patients, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 8.1%. Notably, 77/137 (56.2%) of these variants were novel, with recurrent variants in , , , and , and novel variant types such as two splice site variants in , supported by functional evidence. Additionally, 321 index patients (16.9%) harbored variants of uncertain significance in 102 genes. The most frequently implicated genes included , , , , , and Presumably pathogenic variants in less well-established dystonia genes were also found, including , , and At least six variants (in , , , , and ) occurred supporting pathogenicity. ROC curve analysis indicated that AAO and the presence of generalized dystonia were the strongest predictors of a genetic diagnosis, with diagnostic yields of 28.6% in patients with generalized dystonia and 20.4% in those with AAO < 30 years. This study provides a comprehensive examination of the genetic landscape of dystonia, revealing valuable insights into the frequency of dystonia-linked genes and their associated phenotypes. It underscores the utility of exome sequencing in establishing diagnoses within this heterogeneous condition. Despite prescreening, presumably pathogenic variants were identified in almost 10% of patients. Our findings reaffirm several dystonia candidate genes and expand the phenotypic spectrum of some of these genes to include prominent, sometimes isolated dystonia.
肌张力障碍是最常见的运动障碍之一,其临床和病因具有显著异质性。尽管遗传度较高(约25%)且已鉴定出多个与疾病相关的基因,但大多数患者的病因仍不明确。此外,了解临床表现与基因变异之间的相关性变得越来越复杂。为了全面揭示肌张力障碍的基因谱,我们对1924例肌张力障碍患者进行了外显子组测序[男性占40.3%,白人占92.9%,孤立性肌张力障碍占93.2%,发病年龄中位数(AAO)为33岁],其中包括1895例此前基因检测未确诊的索引患者。样本主要基于两个肌张力障碍登记库(DysTract和肌张力障碍联盟)。此外,还纳入了另外72例主要来自马来西亚的亚洲裔患者。我们优先选择基因预筛查阴性、发病年龄早、家族史阳性以及肌张力障碍多部位受累的患者。对先前与肌张力障碍相关的基因(=405)中的罕见变异进行了检测。通过桑格测序确认变异,并在可能的情况下进行分离分析。我们在1924例患者中的163例(男性占42.9%,白人占85.9%,孤立性肌张力障碍占68.7%,AAO中位数为19岁)中,于51个基因中鉴定出137个不同的可能致病或致病变异(根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会标准)。这包括1895例索引患者中的153例,诊断率为8.1%。值得注意的是,这些变异中有77/137(56.2%)是新发现的,其中 、 、 和 存在反复出现的变异,还有新的变异类型,如 中的两个剪接位点变异,并得到了功能证据的支持。此外,321例索引患者(16.9%)在102个基因中携带意义不明确的变异。最常涉及的基因包括 、 、 、 、 和 。在一些不太明确的肌张力障碍基因中也发现了可能致病的变异,包括 、 和 。至少有六个变异(在 、 、 、 和 中)出现,支持其致病性。ROC曲线分析表明,发病年龄和全身性肌张力障碍的存在是基因诊断的最强预测因素,全身性肌张力障碍患者的诊断率为28.6%,发病年龄<30岁的患者诊断率为20.4%。本研究对肌张力障碍的基因图谱进行了全面检查,揭示了与肌张力障碍相关基因的频率及其相关表型的宝贵见解。它强调了外显子组测序在这种异质性疾病诊断中的实用性。尽管进行了预筛查,但在近10%的患者中仍发现了可能致病的变异。我们的发现再次证实了几个肌张力障碍候选基因,并扩大了其中一些基因的表型谱,以包括显著的、有时是孤立性的肌张力障碍。