Tudor-Sfetea Carina, Topciu Raluca
CEDAR (Clinical Education Development and Research), University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Clin Psychol Eur. 2024 Sep 30;6(3):e11323. doi: 10.32872/cpe.11323. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Despite a minority stress-related higher risk to develop mental health difficulties, and problematic access to and treatment from healthcare providers, research into LGBTQ+ mental health support is limited. The aims of this systematic review were to explore evidence-based cognitive and/or behavioural interventions and adaptations targeting mental health in LGBTQ+ populations, before providing recommendations for future clinical and research directions.
Six databases were searched in February-March 2022 and risk of bias evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I tools. A narrative synthesis following the PICOS framework and the review questions was used to examine the results.
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, including various interventions and adaptations, mental health difficulties, and other emotion- and minority stress-related processes/constructs. Risk of bias was judged as high, and critical/serious, respectively, in all studies. Outcomes included improvements in symptoms of depression (most statistically/clinically significant effects/large effect sizes), and anxiety, emotion regulation, and internalised homophobia in the pre-post studies.
Cognitive/behavioural interventions and adaptations for LGBTQ+ populations feature a range of therapeutic modalities and levels of adaptation, with largely positive effects, in the context of limited and heterogenous literature and risk of bias concerns, as well as limitations related to publication bias and inclusion criteria of the current work. Suggestions for future clinical and research directions include a focus on generic therapeutic competencies and metacompetencies, and affirmative, potentially more holistic approaches, as well as more consistency in methodology, more focus on underserved LGBTQ+ populations and intersectionality, and more detailed investigations into mechanisms of change.
尽管少数群体压力会增加出现心理健康问题的风险,且在获取医疗服务提供者的帮助和接受治疗方面存在问题,但针对 LGBTQ+ 群体心理健康支持的研究仍然有限。本系统评价的目的是在为未来的临床和研究方向提供建议之前,探索针对 LGBTQ+ 群体心理健康的循证认知和/或行为干预及调整措施。
于2022年2月至3月检索了六个数据库,并使用Cochrane RoB 2/ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。采用遵循PICOS框架和综述问题的叙述性综合分析来审视结果。
16项研究符合纳入标准,包括各种干预措施和调整、心理健康问题以及其他与情绪和少数群体压力相关的过程/结构。所有研究的偏倚风险分别被判定为高和严重/关键。结果包括在前后对照研究中,抑郁症状(大多数具有统计学/临床显著效应/大效应量)、焦虑、情绪调节和内化性恐同症有所改善。
针对LGBTQ+群体的认知/行为干预及调整措施具有一系列治疗方式和适应水平,在文献有限且存在异质性、偏倚风险问题以及当前工作存在发表偏倚和纳入标准相关局限性的情况下,大多具有积极效果。对未来临床和研究方向的建议包括关注一般治疗能力和元能力,采用肯定性、可能更全面的方法,以及在方法上更加一致,更多地关注服务不足的LGBTQ+群体和交叉性问题,并更详细地研究改变机制。