Paneru Bandana, Karmacharya Aerona, Makaju Soniya, Kafle Diksha, Poudel Lisasha, Mali Sushmita, Timsina Priyanka, Shrestha Namuna, Timalsena Dinesh, Chaudhary Kalpana, Bhandari Niroj, Rai Prasanna, Shakya Sunila, Spiegelman Donna, Sheth Sangini S, Stangl Anne, Eastment McKenna C, Shrestha Archana
Department of Public Health and Community Programs, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Institute for Implementation Science and Health, Kathmandu, Nepal.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 16;19(12):e0301059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301059. eCollection 2024.
Cancer is the primary cause of death globally, and despite the significant advancements in treatment and survival rates, it is still stigmatized in many parts of the world. However, there is limited public health research on cancer stigma among the general female population in Nepal. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of cancer stigma and its associated factors in this group.
We conducted a cross-sectional study among 426 healthy women aged 30 to 60 years who were residents of Dhulikhel and Banepa in central Nepal. We measured cancer stigma using the Cancer Stigma Scale (CASS). CASS measures cancer stigma in six domains (awkwardness, avoidance, severity, personal responsibility, policy opposition, financial discrimination) on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to agree strongly) with higher mean stigma scores correlating with higher levels of stigma. We utilized Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with multivariable linear regression to identify the socio-demographic factors associated with the CASS score.
Overall, the level of cancer stigma was low, with a mean stigma score of 2.6 (0.6), but it was still present among participants. Stigma related to personal responsibility had the highest levels, with a mean score of 3.9 (1.3), followed by severity with a mean score of 3.2 (1.3), and financial discrimination with a mean score of 2.9 (1.6). There was a significant association between the mean CASS score and older age (mean difference in stigma score: 0.11 points; 95% CI: 0.02-0.20) as well as lower education (difference: -0.02 points; 95% CI: -0.03 to -0.003), after adjusting for age, ethnicity, education, marital status, religion, occupation, and parity.
While overall cancer stigma was low, some domains of stigma were higher among women in a suburban area in central Nepal; thus, indicating that cancer stigma persists in this region despite its low overall prevalence.
癌症是全球首要死因,尽管在治疗和生存率方面取得了重大进展,但在世界许多地区它仍然受到污名化。然而,尼泊尔普通女性群体中关于癌症污名化的公共卫生研究有限。因此,本研究旨在确定该群体中癌症污名化的患病率及其相关因素。
我们对尼泊尔中部杜利凯尔和巴内帕的426名年龄在30至60岁的健康女性进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用癌症污名量表(CASS)来测量癌症污名。CASS在六个领域(尴尬、回避、严重性、个人责任、政策反对、经济歧视)以6点李克特量表(从强烈不同意到强烈同意)来测量癌症污名,平均污名得分越高表明污名程度越高。我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)和多变量线性回归来确定与CASS得分相关的社会人口学因素。
总体而言,癌症污名水平较低,平均污名得分为2.6(0.6),但参与者中仍存在污名。与个人责任相关的污名程度最高,平均得分为3.9(1.3),其次是严重性,平均得分为3.2(1.3),经济歧视平均得分为2.9(1.6)。在调整年龄、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、宗教、职业和生育次数后,平均CASS得分与年龄较大(污名得分平均差异:0.11分;95%置信区间:0.02 - 0.20)以及教育程度较低(差异:-0.02分;95%置信区间:-0.03至-0.003)之间存在显著关联。
虽然总体癌症污名程度较低,但尼泊尔中部郊区女性在某些污名领域得分较高;因此,表明尽管该地区总体患病率较低,但癌症污名仍然存在。