• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外受精患者阴道与子宫内膜微生物群的差异特征

Differential characteristics of vaginal versus endometrial microbiota in IVF patients.

作者信息

Polifke Alina, von Schwedler Annika, Gulba Rebecca, Bensmann Ralf, Dilthey Alexander, Nassar Najib N R, Finzer Patrick

机构信息

dus.ana, Düsseldorf Analytik, Immermannstrasse 65 A, 40210, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Krankenhaushygiene, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82466-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-82466-9
PMID:39681607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11649765/
Abstract

Abnormal female reproductive tract microbiota are associated with gynecological disorders such as endometriosis or chronic endometritis and may affect reproductive outcomes. However, the differential diagnostic utility of the vaginal or the endometrial microbiome and the impact of important technical covariates such as the choice of hypervariable regions for 16 S rRNA sequencing remain to be characterized. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare vaginal and endometrial microbiomes in IVF patients diagnosed with implantation failure (IF) and/or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and to investigate the overlap between established vaginal and endometrial microbiome classification schemes. An additional aim was to characterize to which extent the choice of V1-V2 or V2-V3 16 S rRNA sequencing schemes influences the characterization of genital microbiomes. We compared microbiome composition based on V1-V2 rRNA sequencing between matched vaginal smear and endometrial pipelle-obtained biopsy samples (n = 71); in a sub-group (n = 61), we carried out a comparison between V1-V2 and V2-V3 rRNA sequencing. Vaginal and endometrial microbiomes were found to be Lactobacillus-dominated in the majority of patients, with the most abundant Lactobacillus species typically shared between sample types of same patient. Endometrial microbiomes were found to be more diverse than vaginal microbiomes (average Shannon entropy = 1.89 v/s 0.75, p = 10) and bacterial species such as Corynebacterium sp., Staphylococcus sp., Prevotella sp. and Propionibacterium sp. were found to be enriched in the endometrial samples. The use of two widely used clinical classification schemes to detect microbiome dysbiosis in the reproductive tract often led to inconsistent results vaginal community state type (CST) IV, which is associated with bacterial vaginosis, was detected in 9.8% of patients; however, 31,0% of study participants had a non-Lactobacillus-dominated (NLD) endometrial microbiome associated with unfavorable reproductive outcomes. Results based on V2-V3 rRNA sequencing were generally consistent with V1-V2-based; differences were observed for a small number of species, e.g. Bifidobacterium sp., Propionibacterium sp. and Staphylococcus sp. and with respect to slightly increased detection rates of CST IV and NLD. Our study showed that endometrial microbiomes differ substantially from their vaginal counterparts, the application of a trans-cervical sampling method notwithstanding. Characterization of endometrial microbiomes may contribute to the improved detection of women with an unfavorable reproductive outcome prognosis in IVF patients..

摘要

异常的女性生殖道微生物群与子宫内膜异位症或慢性子宫内膜炎等妇科疾病有关,可能会影响生殖结局。然而,阴道或子宫内膜微生物组的鉴别诊断效用以及重要技术协变量(如16S rRNA测序高变区的选择)的影响仍有待明确。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较诊断为植入失败(IF)和/或复发性流产(RPL)的体外受精(IVF)患者的阴道和子宫内膜微生物组,并研究既定的阴道和子宫内膜微生物组分类方案之间的重叠情况。另一个目的是确定V1-V2或V2-V3 16S rRNA测序方案的选择在多大程度上影响生殖道微生物组的特征。我们比较了基于V1-V2 rRNA测序的配对阴道涂片和子宫内膜吸管活检样本(n = 71)之间的微生物组组成;在一个亚组(n = 61)中,我们比较了V1-V2和V2-V3 rRNA测序。在大多数患者中,阴道和子宫内膜微生物组以乳酸杆菌为主,同一患者不同样本类型中最丰富的乳酸杆菌种类通常相同。发现子宫内膜微生物组比阴道微生物组更多样化(平均香农熵=1.89对0.75,p = 10),并且在子宫内膜样本中发现棒状杆菌属、葡萄球菌属、普雷沃菌属和丙酸杆菌属等细菌种类富集。使用两种广泛使用的临床分类方案来检测生殖道微生物组生态失调往往会导致不一致的结果。9.8%的患者检测到与细菌性阴道病相关的阴道群落状态类型(CST)IV;然而,31.0%的研究参与者的子宫内膜微生物组以非乳酸杆菌为主(NLD),这与不良生殖结局相关。基于V2-V3 rRNA测序的结果总体上与基于V1-V2的结果一致;在少数物种(如双歧杆菌属、丙酸杆菌属和葡萄球菌属)以及CST IV和NLD的检测率略有增加方面观察到差异。我们的研究表明,尽管采用了经宫颈采样方法,但子宫内膜微生物组与其阴道对应物有很大不同。子宫内膜微生物组的特征可能有助于改善对IVF患者中生殖结局预后不良的女性的检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/c051de88934a/41598_2024_82466_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/a38881fbec93/41598_2024_82466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/301e569ca673/41598_2024_82466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/42fc1ff3f53f/41598_2024_82466_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/d5a0482c681c/41598_2024_82466_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/7c310f159225/41598_2024_82466_Fig5a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/c3909e21e7ac/41598_2024_82466_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/ac16faed4843/41598_2024_82466_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/c051de88934a/41598_2024_82466_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/a38881fbec93/41598_2024_82466_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/301e569ca673/41598_2024_82466_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/42fc1ff3f53f/41598_2024_82466_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/d5a0482c681c/41598_2024_82466_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/7c310f159225/41598_2024_82466_Fig5a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/c3909e21e7ac/41598_2024_82466_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/ac16faed4843/41598_2024_82466_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28cb/11649765/c051de88934a/41598_2024_82466_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential characteristics of vaginal versus endometrial microbiota in IVF patients.体外受精患者阴道与子宫内膜微生物群的差异特征
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 16;14(1):30508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82466-9.
2
Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure.有证据表明子宫内膜微生物群对植入成功或失败有影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):684-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Controlled ovarian stimulation and progesterone supplementation affect vaginal and endometrial microbiota in IVF cycles: a pilot study.控制性卵巢刺激和孕激素补充会影响 IVF 周期中的阴道和子宫内膜微生物群:一项初步研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Sep;37(9):2315-2326. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01878-4. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
4
The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.阴道微生物组作为体外受精(无论是否进行胞浆内单精子注射)结局的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):1042-1054. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez065.
5
Human embryo implantation: The complex interplay between endometrial receptivity and the microbiome.人类胚胎着床:子宫内膜容受性与微生物群之间的复杂相互作用。
J Reprod Immunol. 2025 Mar;168:104440. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2025.104440. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
6
Insights into the vaginal microbiome in a diverse group of women of African, Asian and European ancestries.对具有非洲、亚洲和欧洲血统的不同女性群体的阴道微生物组的深入了解。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 29;10:e14449. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14449. eCollection 2022.
7
Characterization of vaginal microbiomes in clinician-collected bacterial vaginosis diagnosed samples.临床医生收集的细菌性阴道病诊断样本中阴道微生物群的特征分析。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Apr;13(4):e0258224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02582-24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
Vaginal and endometrial microbiome dysbiosis associated with adverse embryo transfer outcomes.阴道和子宫内膜微生物组失调与不良胚胎移植结局相关。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Aug 28;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01274-y.
9
Characterization of the vaginal and endometrial microbiome in patients with chronic endometritis.慢性子宫内膜炎患者的阴道和子宫内膜微生物组学特征。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Aug;263:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.045. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
Therapeutic intervention based on gene sequencing analysis of microbial 16S ribosomal RNA of the intrauterine microbiome improves pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients: a prospective cohort study.基于宫腔内微生物 16S 核糖体 RNA 基因测序分析的治疗干预可改善 IVF 患者的妊娠结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jan;40(1):125-135. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02688-6. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Shallow shotgun metagenomic sequencing of vaginal microbiomes with the Oxford Nanopore technology enables the reliable determination of vaginal community state types and broad community structures.采用牛津纳米孔技术对阴道微生物群进行浅层鸟枪法宏基因组测序,能够可靠地确定阴道群落状态类型和广泛的群落结构。
BMC Microbiol. 2025 Aug 25;25(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04236-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Relevance of Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiome Investigation in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.反复着床失败和复发性妊娠丢失患者的阴道和子宫内膜微生物组调查的临床意义。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):622. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010622.
2
Therapeutic intervention based on gene sequencing analysis of microbial 16S ribosomal RNA of the intrauterine microbiome improves pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients: a prospective cohort study.基于宫腔内微生物 16S 核糖体 RNA 基因测序分析的治疗干预可改善 IVF 患者的妊娠结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jan;40(1):125-135. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02688-6. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Emu: species-level microbial community profiling of full-length 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing data.
鸸鹋:全长 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore 测序数据的种水平微生物群落分析。
Nat Methods. 2022 Jul;19(7):845-853. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01520-4. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
An Altered Microbiota in the Lower and Upper Female Reproductive Tract of Women with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion.复发性自然流产女性下生殖道和上生殖道菌群的改变。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0046222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00462-22. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Endometrial microbiome: sampling, assessment, and possible impact on embryo implantation.子宫内膜微生物组:采样、评估及其对胚胎着床的可能影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12095-7.
6
Uterine microbiota plasticity during the menstrual cycle: Differences between healthy controls and patients with recurrent miscarriage or implantation failure.月经周期中子宫微生物组的可塑性:健康对照组与复发性流产或着床失败患者之间的差异。
J Reprod Immunol. 2022 Jun;151:103634. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2022.103634. Epub 2022 May 9.
7
Current findings in endometrial microbiome: impact on uterine diseases.子宫内膜微生物组的最新研究进展:对子宫疾病的影响。
Reproduction. 2022 Mar 24;163(5):R81-R96. doi: 10.1530/REP-21-0120.
8
The Endometrial Microbiome and Its Impact on Human Conception.子宫内膜微生物组及其对人类受孕的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):485. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010485.
9
Endometrial microbiota composition is associated with reproductive outcome in infertile patients.子宫内膜微生物组的组成与不孕患者的生殖结局有关。
Microbiome. 2022 Jan 4;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01184-w.
10
Contribution of to Vaginal Health and Diseases: A Systematic Review.关于 在阴道健康和疾病中的作用:系统评价。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 22;11:792787. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.792787. eCollection 2021.