• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于场景分割算法客观评估的误差度量。

Error measures for objective assessment of scene segmentation algorithms.

作者信息

Yasnoff W A, Galbraith W, Bacus J W

出版信息

Anal Quant Cytol. 1979 Jul-Aug;1(2):107-21.

PMID:396835
Abstract

Scene segmentation is an important element in pattern recognition problems. Previous efforts to evaluate and compare scene segmentation procedures have been largely subjective. Quantitative error measures would facilitate objective comparison of scene segmentation algorithms. A theoretical discussion leading to a new generalized quantitative error measure, G2, based on comparison of both pixel class proportions and spatial distributions of "true" and test segmentations, is presented. This error measure was tested on 14 manual segmentations and 40 gynecologic cytology specimens segmented with five different scene segmentation techniques. Results indicate that G2 seems to have the desirable properties of correlation with human observation, categorization of error allowing for weighting, invariance with picture size and ease of computation necessary for a useful scene segmentation error measure.

摘要

场景分割是模式识别问题中的一个重要元素。以往评估和比较场景分割程序的工作在很大程度上是主观的。定量误差度量将有助于对场景分割算法进行客观比较。本文给出了一个理论讨论,该讨论基于对“真实”分割和测试分割的像素类别比例及空间分布的比较,得出了一种新的广义定量误差度量G2。在14个手动分割以及用五种不同场景分割技术分割的40个妇科细胞学标本上对该误差度量进行了测试。结果表明,G2似乎具有与人类观察结果相关、允许加权的误差分类、与图像大小无关以及作为一种有用的场景分割误差度量所需的易于计算等理想特性。

相似文献

1
Error measures for objective assessment of scene segmentation algorithms.用于场景分割算法客观评估的误差度量。
Anal Quant Cytol. 1979 Jul-Aug;1(2):107-21.
2
Scene-segmentation algorithm development using error measures.使用误差度量的场景分割算法开发
Anal Quant Cytol. 1984 Mar;6(1):45-58.
3
Toward objective evaluation of image segmentation algorithms.迈向图像分割算法的客观评估
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2007 Jun;29(6):929-44. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1046.
4
Evaluation of cardiac biventricular segmentation from multiaxis MRI data: a multicenter study.基于多轴磁共振成像数据的心脏双心室分割评估:一项多中心研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):626-36. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21520.
5
A quantitative comparison between manual segmentation and threshold-based segmentation of CLSM recorded images.共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)记录图像的手动分割与基于阈值分割之间的定量比较。
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2007;43:290-5.
6
On scene segmentation and histograms-based curve evolution.基于场景分割和直方图的曲线演化
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2009 Sep;31(9):1708-14. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.21.
7
[The segmentation of urinary cells--a first step in the automated processing in urine cytology (author's transl)].尿细胞的分割——尿细胞学自动处理的第一步(作者译)
Microsc Acta Suppl. 1980;Suppl 4:230-4.
8
White matter lesion extension to automatic brain tissue segmentation on MRI.磁共振成像(MRI)上白质病变向自动脑组织分割的扩展
Neuroimage. 2009 May 1;45(4):1151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.011.
9
Anatomically constrained region deformation for the automated segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala: Method and validation on controls and patients with Alzheimer's disease.用于海马体和杏仁核自动分割的解剖学约束区域变形:方法及在对照人群和阿尔茨海默病患者中的验证
Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 1;34(3):996-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.035. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
10
Quantitative comparison of the performance of SAR segmentation algorithms.合成孔径雷达(SAR)分割算法性能的定量比较。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(11):1534-46. doi: 10.1109/83.725361.

引用本文的文献

1
Shape Similarity Measurement for Known-Object Localization: A New Normalized Assessment.用于已知物体定位的形状相似性测量:一种新的归一化评估方法。
J Imaging. 2019 Sep 23;5(10):77. doi: 10.3390/jimaging5100077.