Drangert Jan-Olof
Department of Thematic Studies of Environmental Change, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 30;16(23):4176. doi: 10.3390/nu16234176.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Improved global data allow for a new understanding of what impact the food we produce, eat and dispose of has on the environment, human health and Nature's resources. The overall goal is to guide decision-makers and individuals by providing in-depth knowledge about the effects of their dietary preferences on human and environmental health.
The method is to investigate ways to reduce environmental degradation and to secure healthy food supplies in an urbanizing world, and to quantify the options.
Reviewed articles show that by eating less meat-based food and more plant-based and soilless food, as well as reducing food waste and recycling urban-disposed nutrients as fertilizers, we could reduce agriculture's land requirement by 50% to 70% while still securing a healthy food supply. Less land under cultivation and pasture would reduce global emissions to air and water to a similar extent, and allow Nature to reclaim freed areas in order to catch more carbon and rejuvenate biodiversity. Thus, we could avoid further environmental degradation such as the current clearing of new fields needed under a business-as-usual regime. Presently, some 17 million people die each year due to poor diets, which is more than double the 7 million deaths since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A return to more plant-based diets with unchanged intake of proteins but less calories, sugar, salt and fat combined with less red meat and ultra-processed food would reduce foremost non-communicable diseases by up to 20% and prolong life. The article suggests that the international focus has gradually turned to the food sector's big contribution to climate change, biodiversity loss and harmful chemicals as well as to poor human health. It argues that this century's rapid population growth and urbanization give urban residents a pivotal role in food's impact on agricultural areas, which today cover half of the globe's inhabitable areas. Their food demand, rather than the activities of farmers, fishermen or loggers, will guide remedial measures to be taken by individuals, industry and the public sector. A tool to calculate the potential environmental footprints of individual or societal measures is presented.
Measures to make the agrifood sector more sustainable are still pending full recognition in international fora such as the UN COP Summits. Smart cities fitted with infrastructures to recycle macro- and micro-nutrients and organic matter have the potential to ameliorate human-induced impacts such as emissions to air and water bodies, crossing planetary boundaries, and polluting extraction of N (nitrogen), P (phosphorus) and K (potassium). Rapid results are within reach since dietary change and the turn-around time of nutrients in food is short compared to decades or centuries for recycled materials in cars or buildings.
背景/目标:更完善的全球数据使人们对我们生产、食用和丢弃的食物对环境、人类健康和自然资源产生的影响有了新的认识。总体目标是通过提供有关饮食偏好对人类和环境健康影响的深入知识,来指导决策者和个人。
该方法是研究在城市化世界中减少环境退化和确保健康食品供应的方法,并对各种选择进行量化。
综述文章表明,通过少吃肉类食物,多吃植物性和无土食物,以及减少食物浪费并将城市丢弃的养分回收用作肥料,我们可以将农业用地需求减少50%至70%,同时仍能确保健康的食物供应。减少耕地和牧场面积将在类似程度上减少全球向空气和水中的排放,并让大自然重新占据腾出的区域,以便捕获更多碳并恢复生物多样性。因此,我们可以避免进一步的环境退化,比如在照常营业模式下当前所需的新田地开垦。目前,每年约有1700万人死于不良饮食,这比自新冠疫情爆发以来的700万死亡人数多一倍以上。回归到更多以植物为基础的饮食,蛋白质摄入量不变,但卡路里、糖、盐和脂肪的摄入量减少,同时减少红肉和超加工食品的摄入,将首先使非传染性疾病最多减少20%并延长寿命。文章指出,国际关注已逐渐转向食品行业对气候变化、生物多样性丧失、有害化学物质以及人类健康不佳的巨大贡献。文章认为,本世纪快速的人口增长和城市化使城市居民在食物对农业地区的影响方面发挥关键作用,如今农业地区覆盖了全球一半的可居住区域。他们的食物需求,而非农民、渔民或伐木工的活动,将引导个人、企业和公共部门采取补救措施。文中介绍了一种计算个人或社会措施潜在环境足迹的工具。
使农业食品部门更具可持续性的措施在联合国缔约方大会等国际论坛上仍未得到充分认可。配备回收宏量和微量营养素及有机物质基础设施的智慧城市,有潜力减轻人为影响,如向空气和水体的排放、跨越地球边界以及对氮(N)、磷(P)和钾(K)的污染性开采。由于饮食变化以及食物中养分的周转时间较短,相比汽车或建筑物中回收材料所需的数十年或数百年,快速取得成果是可以实现的。