Jirapinyo Pichamol, Jaroenlapnopparat Aunchalee, Thompson Christopher C
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States.
Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Dec 17;12(12):E1458-E1464. doi: 10.1055/a-2463-9784. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are effective weight loss therapies. While the efficacy of EGR and AOMs has been established, the effect of combination therapy and its optimal approach remain unknown. This was a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent EGR. Patients were categorized as: 1) monotherapy - EGR alone; 2) combination therapy - an AOM prescribed within 6 months of EGR; and 3) sequential therapy - an AOM prescribed greater than 6 months of EGR. Outcomes included percent total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months, response rate (≥ 10%TWL at 12 months), and serious adverse event rate. A total of 208 patients were included. Of them, 65 (34%), 61 (31%), and 82 (35%) underwent monotherapy, combination therapy, and sequential therapy, respectively. At 12 months, patients who received EGR+GLP-1RA combination therapy achieved the greatest weight loss (23.7±4.6% TWL), while those who began with AOM followed by EGR more than 6 months later had the lowest weight loss (12.0±7.7%TWL) compared with monotherapy (17.3±10.0% TWL) ( = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). The response rate was 100% for EGR+GLP-1RA combination therapy and 56% for AOM followed by EGR sequential therapy ( = 0.02). Combining AOM with EGR appears to result in greater weight loss compared with other strategies, with GLP-1RA as the preferred agent and optimal initiation of both therapies occurring within 6 months of each other. Prolonged medication use prior to EGR appears to be associated with suboptimal weight loss, suggesting the importance of early referral for adjunctive therapy.
内镜下胃重塑(EGR)和抗肥胖药物(AOMs)是有效的减肥疗法。虽然EGR和AOMs的疗效已经得到证实,但联合治疗的效果及其最佳方法仍不清楚。这是一项对接受EGR患者的前瞻性收集数据进行的单中心回顾性研究。患者被分为:1)单一疗法——仅EGR;2)联合疗法——在EGR后6个月内开具AOM;3)序贯疗法——在EGR后6个月以上开具AOM。结局指标包括12个月时的总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)、缓解率(12个月时≥10%TWL)和严重不良事件发生率。共纳入208例患者。其中,分别有65例(34%)、61例(31%)和82例(35%)接受了单一疗法、联合疗法和序贯疗法。在12个月时,接受EGR+GLP-1RA联合治疗的患者体重减轻最多(23.7±4.6%TWL),而那些先使用AOM然后在6个月后进行EGR的患者体重减轻最少(12.0±7.7%TWL),与单一疗法(17.3±10.0%TWL)相比(分别为P = 0.04和0.03)。EGR+GLP-1RA联合治疗的缓解率为100%,AOM后EGR序贯治疗的缓解率为56%(P = 0.02)。与其他策略相比,将AOM与EGR联合使用似乎能带来更大的体重减轻,GLP-1RA为首选药物,两种疗法的最佳启动时间应在彼此6个月内。EGR前长期用药似乎与体重减轻不理想有关,这表明早期转诊接受辅助治疗很重要。