• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚心理健康及相关系统中健康信息的收集与共享:使用心理健康服务者的观点

Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.

作者信息

Honey Anne, Hancock Nicola, Glover Helen, Scanlan Justin Newton, Cao Yidan, Povolny Andrew, Orr Mark, Rose Grenville, Govindasamy Sumathi, Smith Lorraine, Ahmadapour Naseem

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building (D18), Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Enlightened Consultants, PO Box 7361, Redland Bay, QLD, 4165, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1
PMID:39695423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11656865/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information sharing and information privacy are important issues in mental health services. Yet the perspectives of Australians who access mental health services about these issues are poorly understood. This article addresses the research question: What are the concerns of people who use mental health services about the collection and use of their health information in mental health and related systems in Australia?

METHODS

Participants were 16 people who had accessed mental health services and were involved in a series of co-design workshops as part of a larger study. Focused group activities were conducted in which participants were asked to discuss and create a visual map to describe their collective experiences of sharing information relating to mental health and recovery. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and the coding techniques of constant comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Participants expressed a sense of unknowability about the information held and accessed by various organisations. They described providing information to a wide variety of entities, though not always in a free or informed way. They believed other information held about them had been generated and/or shared by people other than themselves, often without their knowledge or consent. Participants reported that both the collection and storage of this information involved risks for them, and they sometimes restricted the information they provided. To improve their comfort with the use of their information, participants recommended customised and transparent information collection; individuals' access and input to their own information; and use of information only for their benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Trust is key to positive experiences of information provision and information sharing. Central to establishing trust are transparent practices that facilitate greater choice and control.

摘要

背景

信息共享和信息隐私是心理健康服务中的重要问题。然而,对于使用心理健康服务的澳大利亚人在这些问题上的观点,我们知之甚少。本文探讨了以下研究问题:在澳大利亚,使用心理健康服务的人对其健康信息在心理健康及相关系统中的收集和使用有哪些担忧?

方法

参与者为16名曾使用过心理健康服务的人,他们参与了一系列协同设计研讨会,这是一项更大规模研究的一部分。开展了焦点小组活动,要求参与者讨论并制作一张可视化地图,以描述他们在分享与心理健康和康复相关信息方面的集体经历。使用定性内容分析法和持续比较分析的编码技术对数据进行了分析。

结果

参与者对各组织持有和获取的信息有一种不可知感。他们描述了向各种各样的实体提供信息,但并不总是以自由或知情的方式。他们认为关于自己的其他信息是由他人生成和/或分享的,而他们往往对此并不知情或未经其同意。参与者报告称,这些信息的收集和存储对他们来说都存在风险,他们有时会限制自己提供的信息。为了提高对自身信息使用的舒适度,参与者建议进行定制化和透明的信息收集;个人能够访问并输入自己的信息;以及仅为他们的利益使用信息。

结论

信任是信息提供和信息共享积极体验的关键。建立信任的核心是促进更多选择和控制的透明做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df4/11656865/85f2b26dfb3b/12888_2024_6347_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df4/11656865/80779e7e2d9b/12888_2024_6347_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df4/11656865/85f2b26dfb3b/12888_2024_6347_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df4/11656865/80779e7e2d9b/12888_2024_6347_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df4/11656865/85f2b26dfb3b/12888_2024_6347_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.澳大利亚心理健康及相关系统中健康信息的收集与共享:使用心理健康服务者的观点
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06347-1.
2
Perspectives of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) community members regarding mental health services: A qualitative analysis.文化和语言多样化(CALD)社区成员对心理健康服务的看法:定性分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Aug;30(4):850-864. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12919. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Types and aspects of support that young carers need and value, and barriers and enablers to access: the REBIAS-YC qualitative study.年轻照顾者需要和重视的支持类型和方面,以及获得支持的障碍和促进因素:REBIAS-YC 定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(36):1-108. doi: 10.3310/ABAT6761.
4
Service design for children and young people with common mental health problems: literature review, service mapping and collective case study.儿童和青少年常见心理健康问题的服务设计:文献综述、服务映射和集体案例研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(13):1-181. doi: 10.3310/DKRT6293.
5
The Role of Data Type and Recipient in Individuals' Perspectives on Sharing Passively Collected Smartphone Data for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.数据类型和接收者在个体对被动收集的智能手机数据用于心理健康共享的观点中的作用:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 5;7(4):e12578. doi: 10.2196/12578.
6
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
7
Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.药品相关应用程序和移动生态系统的数据共享实践:流量、内容和网络分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 20;364:l920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l920.
8
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services.病情还不够严重:精神病患者照料者在与心理健康服务机构协商为其亲属提供护理时的经历。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):403-411. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12399.
9
[Sharing information and respecting confidentiality: Standards for improving the quality of mental health services].[信息共享与保密:提高心理健康服务质量的标准]
Sante Ment Que. 2023 Fall;48(2):151-177.
10
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting self-determination in mental health recovery: Strategies employed by occupational therapists.支持精神健康康复中的自主决策:职业治疗师采用的策略。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2024 Feb;71(1):88-101. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12913. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
2
Medical data sharing and privacy: a false dichotomy?医疗数据共享与隐私:一种错误的二分法?
Swiss Med Wkly. 2023 Jan 6;153:40019. doi: 10.57187/smw.2023.40019.
3
My data choices: Pilot evaluation of patient-controlled medical record sharing technology.我的数据选择:患者自控病历共享技术的初步评估。
Health Informatics J. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):14604582221143893. doi: 10.1177/14604582221143893.
4
Service user experiences of mental health assessments: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature.精神健康评估中的服务使用者体验:定性文献的系统综述与主题综合分析
J Ment Health. 2025 Feb;34(1):91-104. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2069691. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
5
Impact of Electronic Health Records on Information Practices in Mental Health Contexts: Scoping Review.电子健康记录对心理健康环境下信息实践的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 4;24(5):e30405. doi: 10.2196/30405.
6
Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 2): Focus Group Study.行为健康专业人员对患者控制的细粒度信息共享的看法(第2部分):焦点小组研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):e18792. doi: 10.2196/18792.
7
Attitudes of Mental Health Service Users Toward Storage and Use of Electronic Health Records.心理健康服务使用者对电子健康记录存储和使用的态度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Sep 1;73(9):1013-1018. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100477. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
8
Factors Associated With Willingness to Share Health Information: Rapid Review.与健康信息分享意愿相关的因素:快速综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 9;9(1):e20702. doi: 10.2196/20702.
9
Investigating Mental Health Service User Opinions on Clinical Data Sharing: Qualitative Focus Group Study.调查精神卫生服务使用者对临床数据共享的看法:定性焦点小组研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Sep 3;8(9):e30596. doi: 10.2196/30596.
10
An equitable approach to enhancing the privacy of consumer information on in Australia.澳大利亚增强消费者信息隐私的公平方法。
Health Inf Manag. 2023 Jan;52(1):37-40. doi: 10.1177/18333583211019764. Epub 2021 Jun 16.