Xiao Zhan-Shuo, Zhou Heng, Jiang Yi-Lin, Samah Narina A
Department of Dermatology, Guanganmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Department of Student Affairs, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1793-1796. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i12.1793.
This article examines the critical integration of reflexivity, cultural sensitivity, and emergent design in qualitative psychiatry research focused on lived experiences. While quantitative methods offer essential clinical insights, qualitative approaches provide a deeper understanding of the emotional, psychological, and social dimensions of mental health. Reflexivity enables researchers to remain aware of how their personal biases and professional backgrounds shape data interpretation. Cultural sensitivity ensures that mental health conditions are understood within their broader cultural contexts, helping avoid misrepresentation and promoting authentic participant expression. Emergent design offers flexibility in adapting the research process to evolving themes, particularly in the dynamic and multifaceted realm of psychiatric conditions. Together, these principles promote ethically sound, participant-centered research that captures the full complexity of lived experiences. The article also highlighted the practical implications of these principles for enhancing both academic knowledge and clinical practice in psychiatry.
本文探讨了反思性、文化敏感性和应急设计在以生活经历为重点的定性精神病学研究中的关键整合。虽然定量方法提供了重要的临床见解,但定性方法能更深入地理解心理健康的情感、心理和社会层面。反思性使研究人员能够意识到他们的个人偏见和专业背景如何影响数据解释。文化敏感性确保在更广泛的文化背景中理解心理健康状况,有助于避免错误表述并促进参与者真实表达。应急设计为使研究过程适应不断演变的主题提供了灵活性,尤其是在精神疾病动态且多面的领域。这些原则共同促进了符合伦理、以参与者为中心的研究,该研究捕捉了生活经历的全部复杂性。本文还强调了这些原则对加强精神病学学术知识和临床实践的实际意义。