David Fearon, Felicity Knights, Cherisse Ratiram, Liz Grant, Marie Fallon
The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics.
University of Edinburgh.
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Sep;32(6):1740-1748. doi: 10.1177/09697330241305546. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
IntroductionQuality improvement is the systematic seeking of improvements in care and experience. This discussion paper will explore how the principles of good clinical care and the established ethical frameworks for research can help guide its practice, using examples from palliative care.Quality improvement in palliative carePalliative care is well positioned to be at the vanguard of quality improvement in healthcare. But it holds ethical particularities which require specific considerations, that are helpful for other specialities. The experiences of two improvement activities in palliative care, the Liverpool Care Pathway and Do Not Attempt Resuscitation status reviews, illustrate potential dangers of QI.Implications for ethical practiceRecommendations for ethically sound quality improvement projects in palliative care include paying attention to the burden of time, viewing informed consent as a tool, monitoring for vulnerability and coercion and transparency in the use of data. The ethics and practices in clinical encounters provide a framework for approaching consent and protecting those with palliative care needs who are deemed as vulnerable. It is explicit in palliative care that time and energy are precious and finite resources. These must be valued and respected in any quality improvement projects. Respect for beneficence and autonomy is essential to avoid coercion and for any project to be ethically sound.ConclusionQuality improvement processes are an integral part of good healthcare practices. High ethical standards, a supportive culture, transparency and candour are needed for the promotion and sustainability of quality improvement in palliative care.
引言
质量改进是对医疗护理及体验进行系统性的提升探索。本讨论文件将以姑息治疗中的实例,探讨良好临床护理原则和既定的研究伦理框架如何有助于指导其实践。
姑息治疗中的质量改进
姑息治疗处于医疗保健质量改进的前沿位置。但它具有一些伦理特殊性,需要特别加以考虑,这对其他专业领域也有帮助。姑息治疗中的两项改进活动,即利物浦护理路径和不进行心肺复苏状态评估的经验,说明了质量改进的潜在风险。
对伦理实践的启示
对姑息治疗中符合伦理的质量改进项目的建议包括关注时间负担、将知情同意视为一种工具、监测脆弱性和胁迫情况以及数据使用的透明度。临床诊疗中的伦理和实践为处理同意问题以及保护被视为脆弱的姑息治疗需求者提供了一个框架。在姑息治疗中明确的是,时间和精力是宝贵且有限的资源。在任何质量改进项目中都必须重视和尊重这些资源。尊重行善原则和自主性对于避免胁迫以及任何项目在伦理上合理至关重要。
结论
质量改进过程是良好医疗实践不可或缺的一部分。在姑息治疗中促进质量改进并使其持续下去需要高伦理标准、支持性文化、透明度和坦诚态度。