Panofsky Aaron, Dasgupta Kushan, Iturriaga Nicole, Koch Bernard
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S14-S21. doi: 10.1002/hast.4925.
Genomics research is regularly appropriated in social and political contexts to publicly legitimize unjust and malicious political views, policies, and actions. In recent years, there have been high-profile cases of mass shooters, public intellectuals, and political insiders using genomics findings to convince audiences that deadly force and coercive policies against racial minorities are warranted. To create a just genomics, geneticists must consider what makes their research so attractive and adaptable for the legitimization of unjust ends and what they can do to counter such appropriations. We offer insights and recommendations drawing from our research into the many ways online white nationalist and far-right political movements mobilize genetics research to promote their racist, sexist, antisemitic, and homophobic views. First, geneticists should identify and change routine research practices that feed eugenic thinking. Second, geneticists should adopt creative extra-scholarly communication efforts to counter the use of their field's research that occurs in nonscholarly spaces. Third, we identify permissive epistemological and professional practices within the genetics field that have enabled such unjust appropriations to thrive, and we recommend strategies for institutional reform.
基因组学研究经常在社会和政治背景下被挪用,以公开地使不公正和恶意的政治观点、政策及行为合法化。近年来,有一些备受瞩目的案例,大规模枪击者、公共知识分子和政治圈内人士利用基因组学研究结果来说服受众,认为对少数族裔使用致命武力和强制政策是合理的。为了创造一个公正的基因组学环境,遗传学家必须思考是什么让他们的研究对不公正目的的合法化如此有吸引力且易于被挪用,以及他们可以采取什么措施来对抗这种挪用行为。我们从对在线白人民族主义和极右翼政治运动以多种方式动员遗传学研究来宣扬其种族主义、性别歧视、反犹主义和恐同观点的研究中提供见解和建议。首先,遗传学家应该识别并改变助长优生学思想的常规研究做法。其次,遗传学家应该采取创造性的学术外交流努力,以对抗在非学术领域对其学科研究的利用。第三,我们识别出了遗传学领域中使得这种不公正挪用得以盛行的宽容的认识论和专业做法,并推荐了制度改革策略。