Bratches Reed W R, Backhouse Tamara, Barr Paul J, Lee Cheryl, Puga Frank, Jablonski Rita A
University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14451. doi: 10.1002/alz.14451. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
Little is known about the factors associated with care-resistant behavior in community-dwelling persons living with dementia.
Regression modeling was performed on 41,143 responses to a standardized questionnaire from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set.
In the fully adjusted mixed-effects regression model, collinearity was low, with no variance inflation factor above 1.15. Moderate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50, 1.69) and severe (aOR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.82, 2.09) dementia severity; and Black (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.47, 1.82), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.28), frontotemporal (aOR 1.29; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.49) and Lewy body dementia (aOR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.29) diagnosis type were associated with a higher odds of care-resistant behavior. Female sex (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.91) and higher education (aOR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) were associated with lower odds of care-resistant behavior.
Interventions to manage care-resistant behaviors should consider sociocultural factors as well as type of dementia diagnosis to limit caregiver strain and burden.
Frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, and Black race were associated with a higher likelihood of exhibiting care-resistant behavior. Female sex and higher educational attainment were associated with a lower likelihood of exhibiting care-resistant behavior. Differences in specific presentations of care-resistant behaviors are less understood.
对于社区中患有痴呆症的居民中与护理抗拒行为相关的因素,我们知之甚少。
对来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集的标准化问卷的41,143份回复进行回归建模。
在完全调整的混合效应回归模型中,共线性较低,方差膨胀因子均未超过1.15。中度(调整后的优势比[aOR]=1.59;95%置信区间[CI]:1.50,1.69)和重度(aOR = 1.95;95% CI:1.82,2.09)痴呆严重程度;以及黑人(aOR = 1.64;95% CI:1.47,1.82)、西班牙裔(aOR 1.13;95% CI:1.00,1.28)、额颞叶(aOR 1.29;95% CI:1.12,1.49)和路易体痴呆(aOR 1.15;95% CI:1.02,1.29)诊断类型与护理抗拒行为的较高几率相关。女性(aOR 0.85;95% CI:0.80,0.91)和较高教育程度(aOR 0.9,95% CI:0.84,0.97)与护理抗拒行为的较低几率相关。
管理护理抗拒行为的干预措施应考虑社会文化因素以及痴呆诊断类型,以减轻护理人员的压力和负担。
额颞叶痴呆、路易体痴呆和黑人种族与表现出护理抗拒行为的较高可能性相关。女性和较高的教育程度与表现出护理抗拒行为的较低可能性相关。对护理抗拒行为的具体表现差异了解较少。