Silva Julia Lavinia Pereira, Alves Debora Pinheiro Lédio, Figueiredo Sebastiana da Costa, Ricioli Junior Walter, Queiroz Marcelo Cavalheiro de, Polesello Giancarlo Cavalli
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Grupo de Quadril, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 21;59(6):e944-e949. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792113. eCollection 2024 Dec.
To validate the Portuguese version of the evaluation instrument modified Harris Hip Score. The modified Harris Hip Score went through a validation process for the Portuguese language. We tested the measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the modified Harris Hip Score (HHSmBr) on 100 patients (63% females and 37% males) with different hip conditions. Determination of test-retest reliability occurred in 100 participants after an interval of 7 to 14 days. The Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) evaluated internal consistency and reliability, respectively. The distribution of questions in different categories assessed the floor/ceiling effect. Patients answered the ( ) and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) questionnaires to validate estimates. The internal consistency of the HHSmBr was 0.724 in the test and 0.706 in the retest. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.80). The floor/ceiling effect only occurred in the pain domain, with scores 23.2% and 12.1% in test and retest, respectively. Comparing the HHSmBr with the WOMAC and HOOS scores, the lowest and highest correlation values were -0.466 and -0.906, respectively, indicating a moderate-to-strong correlation. Our study showed that the HHSmBr is a valid and reliable hip-specific assessment questionnaire in Portuguese.
验证评估工具改良版Harris髋关节评分的葡萄牙语版本。改良版Harris髋关节评分经历了葡萄牙语的验证过程。我们在100名患有不同髋关节疾病的患者（63%为女性，37%为男性）身上测试了巴西葡萄牙语版改良Harris髋关节评分（HHSmBr）的测量特性。在7至14天的间隔后，对100名参与者进行了重测信度测定。Cronbach α系数和组内相关系数（ICC）分别评估了内部一致性和信度。不同类别问题的分布评估了地板效应/天花板效应。患者回答了（ ）以及髋关节残疾与骨关节炎疗效评分（HOOS）问卷以验证评估结果。HHSmBr的内部一致性在测试中为0.724，在重测中为0.706。重测信度极佳（ICC = 0.80）。地板效应/天花板效应仅出现在疼痛领域，测试和重测中的得分分别为23.2%和12.1%。将HHSmBr与WOMAC评分和HOOS评分进行比较，最低和最高相关值分别为-0.466和-0.906，表明存在中度至高度相关性。我们的研究表明，HHSmBr是一种有效的、可靠的葡萄牙语髋关节特异性评估问卷。
