Goldsmiths, University of London.
University of Maryland.
Child Dev. 2019 Nov;90(6):e703-e717. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13094. Epub 2018 May 20.
The present study examined how peer group norms influence children's evaluations of deviant ingroup members. Following the manipulation of competitive or cooperative norms, participants (children, M = 8.69; adolescents, M = 13.81; adults, M = 20.89; n = 263) evaluated deviant ingroup members from their own and the group's perspective. Children rated cooperative deviancy positively and believed their group would do the same. Adolescents and adults believed that their group would negatively evaluate cooperative deviancy when their group supported a competitive allocation strategy. Reasoning varied based on norm and participants' agreement with deviancy. Understanding an ingroup may not be favorable toward a cooperative deviant in a competitive context is a developmental challenge requiring the coordination of social and moral norms.
本研究考察了同伴群体规范如何影响儿童对偏差内群体成员的评价。在竞争或合作规范的操作之后，参与者（儿童，M=8.69；青少年，M=13.81；成年人，M=20.89；n=263）从自己和群体的角度评价偏差内群体成员。儿童积极评价合作偏差，并认为他们的群体也会这样做。青少年和成年人认为，当他们的群体支持竞争分配策略时，他们的群体将对合作偏差进行负面评价。推理基于规范和参与者对偏差的认同而有所不同。在竞争环境中，内群体可能不赞成合作偏差，这是一个需要协调社会和道德规范的发展挑战。
