Suppr超能文献

关节置换手术中患者报告结局的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries.

作者信息

Äärimaa Ville, Kohtala Karita, Mäkelä Keijo, Karvonen Mikko, Arimaa Anssi, Ryösä Anssi, Kostensalo Joel, Kaivonen Fanny, Laaksonen Inari

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0314818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314818. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to report and analyze disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) effect size (ES) variations, in patients undergoing major arthroplasty surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All institution-based data of primary knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty patients at Turku University hospital (Finland) between January 2020 -December 2022 were collected, and treatment outcome assessed as a PROM difference between baseline and one-year follow-up. PROM ES were calculated for each patient and patient group separately, and patients with ES >0.5, were considered responders. Factors contributing to patient outcome and differences between patient groups were investigated using linear models and non-parametric methods.

RESULTS

2580 patients were operated (complete follow-up data on 1828 patients). 1110 (61%) of the patients were female, and mean age was 69 years (SD 10). The mean ES across all patient groups was 2.64 (SD 1.29) and the biggest ES was observed in shoulder patients and the smallest in knee patients. Smaller ES was statistically significantly associated with higher preoperative PROM, higher ASA class, and old age. The percentage of responders was highest for shoulder patients (97.7%), followed by hip patients (96.8%), and lowest for knee patients (92.5%).

CONCLUSION

The observed ES for joint arthroplasty surgeries is high. However, there are significant disparities among patients with primary knee, hip, and shoulder joint arthroplasty surgery. These variations are mainly due to differences in preoperative PROM score and may be attributed to differences in patient selection. We recommend that prior to shared decision-making, preoperative scores are thoroughly reviewed with the patient, along with other patient specific factors that may influence the end result of the treatment.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在报告和分析接受大关节置换手术患者的疾病特异性患者报告结局指标(PROM)效应大小(ES)的差异。

材料与方法

收集了芬兰图尔库大学医院2020年1月至2022年12月期间所有原发性膝关节、髋关节或肩关节置换患者的机构数据,并将治疗结果评估为基线与一年随访之间的PROM差异。分别为每位患者和患者组计算PROM ES,ES>0.5的患者被视为有反应者。使用线性模型和非参数方法研究影响患者结局的因素以及患者组之间的差异。

结果

2580例患者接受了手术(1828例患者有完整的随访数据)。1110例(61%)患者为女性,平均年龄为69岁(标准差10)。所有患者组的平均ES为2.64(标准差1.29),肩关节置换患者的ES最大,膝关节置换患者的ES最小。较小的ES在统计学上与术前较高的PROM、较高的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级和高龄显著相关。肩关节置换患者的有反应者百分比最高(97.7%),其次是髋关节置换患者(96.8%),膝关节置换患者最低(92.5%)。

结论

观察到的关节置换手术的ES较高。然而,原发性膝关节、髋关节和肩关节置换手术患者之间存在显著差异。这些差异主要是由于术前PROM评分的不同,可能归因于患者选择的差异。我们建议在共同决策之前,与患者一起仔细审查术前评分以及其他可能影响治疗最终结果的患者特定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f78/11666041/3ce6872651d7/pone.0314818.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验