de Verdal Hugues, Segura Vincent, Pot David, Salas Niclolas, Garin Vincent, Rakotoson Tatiana, Raboin Louis-Marie, VomBrocke Kirsten, Dusserre Julie, Castro Pacheco Sergio Antonion, Grenier Cecile
AGAP Institut, Université Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
CIRAD, UMR AGAP Institut, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0309502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309502. eCollection 2024.
Phenomic prediction (PP), a novel approach utilizing Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) data, offers an alternative to genomic prediction (GP) for breeding applications. In PP, a hyperspectral relationship matrix replaces the genomic relationship matrix, potentially capturing both additive and non-additive genetic effects. While PP boasts advantages in cost and throughput compared to GP, the factors influencing its accuracy remain unclear and need to be defined. This study investigated the impact of various factors, namely the training population size, the multi-environment information integration, and the incorporations of genotype x environment (GxE) effects, on PP compared to GP. We evaluated the prediction accuracies for several agronomically important traits (days to flowering, plant height, yield, harvest index, thousand-grain weight, and grain nitrogen content) in a rice diversity panel grown in four distinct environments. Training population size and GxE effects inclusion had minimal influence on PP accuracy. The key factor impacting the accuracy of PP was the number of environments included. Using data from a single environment, GP generally outperformed PP. However, with data from multiple environments, using genotypic random effect and relationship matrix per environment, PP achieved comparable accuracies to GP. Combining PP and GP information did not significantly improve predictions compared to the best model using a single source of information (e.g., average predictive ability of GP, PP, and combined GP and PP for grain yield were of 0.44, 0.42, and 0.44, respectively). Our findings suggest that PP can be as accurate as GP when all genotypes have at least one NIRS measurement, potentially offering significant advantages for rice breeding programs, reducing the breeding cycles and lowering program costs.
表型组预测(PP)是一种利用近红外光谱(NIRS)数据的新方法,为育种应用中的基因组预测(GP)提供了一种替代方案。在PP中,高光谱关系矩阵取代了基因组关系矩阵,有可能捕获加性和非加性遗传效应。虽然与GP相比,PP在成本和通量方面具有优势,但其影响准确性的因素仍不清楚,需要加以明确。本研究调查了各种因素,即训练群体大小、多环境信息整合以及基因型×环境(G×E)效应的纳入,对PP与GP的影响。我们评估了在四个不同环境中种植的水稻多样性群体中几个重要农艺性状(开花天数、株高、产量、收获指数、千粒重和籽粒氮含量)的预测准确性。训练群体大小和G×E效应的纳入对PP准确性的影响最小。影响PP准确性的关键因素是所包含的环境数量。使用来自单一环境的数据,GP通常优于PP。然而,对于来自多个环境的数据,使用每个环境的基因型随机效应和关系矩阵,PP实现了与GP相当的准确性。与使用单一信息源的最佳模型相比,结合PP和GP信息并没有显著提高预测效果(例如,GP、PP以及组合的GP和PP对籽粒产量的平均预测能力分别为0.44、0.42和0.44)。我们的研究结果表明,当所有基因型至少有一次NIRS测量时,PP可以与GP一样准确,这可能为水稻育种计划带来显著优势,减少育种周期并降低计划成本。