• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在掌骨干骨折中,石膏固定是否优于钢板固定?

Is casting superior to plate fixation in metacarpal shaft fractures?

作者信息

Bozkurt Orhun Eray, Bezirgan Ugur, Acar Erdinc, Nergizal Osman Talha, Dumlupinar Ebru, Armangil Mehmet

机构信息

Kulu Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji, El Cerrahisi Bölümü, 42777 Kulu, Konya, Türkiye

出版信息

Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2025 Jan 2;36(1):182-192. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2025.1983. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2025.1983
PMID:39719916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734841/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the outcomes and conduct a cost analysis between plate screw fixation and conservative treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retrospective study was conducted with 36 patients (32 males, 4 females; mean age: 30.3±13.4 years; range, 16 to 65 years) between May 2019 and July 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgery with miniplate fixation (n=21) and those who were conservatively managed (n=15). The differences in postoperative shortening and angulation were compared between these groups. Additionally, the patients' postoperative functional scores, complication rates, examination findings, and cost analyses were compared.

RESULTS

The per-patient cost in the surgical group was higher than in the conservatively treated group (€246.96 vs. €45.07; p<0.001). While postoperative shortening and angulation were more pronounced in the nonoperative group, the other clinical parameters and functional scores were improved. The return-to-work time was longer in the nonoperative group due to prolonged immobilization.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative splint treatment for metacarpal shaft fractures shows better radiological and clinical outcomes than surgery, except for angulation and shortening, which have limited impact on function. Due to higher costs in surgical cases, nonoperative treatment is more cost-effective. Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较钢板螺钉固定与保守治疗的疗效并进行成本分析。

患者与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了2019年5月至2023年7月期间的36例患者(32例男性,4例女性;平均年龄:30.3±13.4岁;范围16至65岁)。患者被分为两组:接受微型钢板固定手术的患者(n = 21)和接受保守治疗的患者(n = 15)。比较两组术后短缩和成角的差异。此外,还比较了患者的术后功能评分、并发症发生率、检查结果和成本分析。

结果

手术组的人均成本高于保守治疗组(246.96欧元对45.07欧元;p < 0.001)。虽然非手术组术后短缩和成角更明显,但其他临床参数和功能评分有所改善。由于固定时间延长,非手术组的重返工作时间更长。

结论

除了成角和短缩对功能影响有限外,掌骨干骨折的非手术夹板治疗在影像学和临床疗效方面优于手术治疗。由于手术病例成本较高,非手术治疗更具成本效益。需要更大规模的随机试验来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7a/11734841/45b4f1d250cb/JDRS-2025-36-1-182-192-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7a/11734841/c83e39ad7ab8/JDRS-2025-36-1-182-192-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7a/11734841/45b4f1d250cb/JDRS-2025-36-1-182-192-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7a/11734841/c83e39ad7ab8/JDRS-2025-36-1-182-192-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7a/11734841/45b4f1d250cb/JDRS-2025-36-1-182-192-F3.jpg

相似文献

1
Is casting superior to plate fixation in metacarpal shaft fractures?在掌骨干骨折中,石膏固定是否优于钢板固定?
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2025 Jan 2;36(1):182-192. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2025.1983. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
Results of surgical treatment in metacarpal shaft fractures using low profile mini plates.使用低轮廓微型钢板治疗掌骨干骨折的手术结果
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Jul;21(4):279-84. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.01651.
3
Comparison of treatment of oblique and spiral metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with mini plate plus screw or screw only.微型钢板加螺丝钉与单纯螺丝钉治疗掌骨和指骨斜形及螺旋形骨折的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):499-504. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2164-3. Epub 2015 Feb 15.
4
Comparison of the fixation ability between lag screw and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fracture.斜形掌骨干骨折拉力螺钉与接骨板固定能力的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 5;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02963-3.
5
Clinical outcomes of limited-open retrograde intramedullary headless screw fixation of metacarpal fractures.掌骨骨折有限切开逆行髓内无头螺钉固定术的临床疗效
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Dec;39(12):2390-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
6
Reliability of unicortical plate fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures: A preliminary clinical report with short-term follow-up.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2025 May;70(3):153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2024.12.005. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
7
Bone plate fixation ability on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft transverse fracture.掌骨干横形骨折背侧和外侧骨板固定能力。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 7;16(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02575-3.
8
Comparison of AO Titanium Locking Plate and Screw Fixation versus Anterograde Intramedullary Fixation for Isolated Unstable Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures.AO钛锁定钢板螺钉固定与顺行髓内固定治疗孤立性不稳定掌骨和指骨骨折的比较
Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/os.12271.
9
Comparison of low-profile locking plate fixation versus antegrade intramedullary nailing for unstable metacarpal shaft fractures--A prospective comparative study.掌骨干不稳定骨折采用低切迹锁定钢板固定与顺行髓内钉固定的比较--一项前瞻性对照研究。
Injury. 2019 Dec;50(12):2252-2258. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.018. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
A Comparison of Locking Plates and Intramedullary Pinning for Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures.锁定钢板与髓内针固定掌骨干骨折的比较
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jan;14(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/1558944718798854. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Displaced Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.掌骨干骨折移位的治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JPRAS Open. 2023 Oct 5;38:163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.10.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Writing for Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS): There is something new and interesting in this article!为《关节疾病与相关外科手术》(JDRS)撰写文章:本文有一些新颖有趣的内容!
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 Sep 21;34(3):533. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.57916.
3
Metacarpal fractures.掌骨骨折。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Sep;48(2_suppl):42S-50S. doi: 10.1177/17531934231184119.
4
Comparison of plaster cast and open reduction internal fixation in delayed fourth and fifth carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations.比较石膏固定与切开复位内固定治疗第四、第五掌腕掌关节迟发性骨折脱位。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 Apr 26;34(2):315-324. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.851.
5
A Comparison of Outcomes following Plate versus Pin Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft and Neck Fractures.掌骨干骨折和掌骨颈骨折钢板与钢针固定术后疗效比较
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jan 10;11(1):e4741. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004741. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for Displaced Finger Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A Prospective, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial.移位性指掌骨干骨折的非手术与手术治疗:一项前瞻性、非劣效性、随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Jan 18;105(2):98-106. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00573. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
7
Comparison of the fixation ability between lag screw and bone plate for oblique metacarpal shaft fracture.斜形掌骨干骨折拉力螺钉与接骨板固定能力的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 5;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02963-3.
8
A Systematic Review of Treatment Interventions for Metacarpal Shaft Fractures in Adults.成人掌骨干骨折治疗干预的系统评价。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Sep;17(5):869-878. doi: 10.1177/1558944720974363. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
9
The use of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and rating scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.应用瘢痕美容评估及评分量表评价全胸腔镜心脏手术的美容效果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 11;15(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01294-w.
10
Management of metacarpal fractures.掌骨骨折的治疗
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul-Aug;11(4):554-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.043. Epub 2020 Jun 6.