Suppr超能文献

脊柱手术中局部联合静脉注射氨甲环酸的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析

The efficacy and safety of topical combined with intravenous administration of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Xie Chengxin, Ren Yu, Chen Xiaoxiao, Zhu Yanwu, Jiang Jiao, Lu Bing, Luo Hua

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, 317000, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, 317000, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 27;25(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08191-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the efficacy of intravenous combined topical tranexamic acid. We conducted this study to systematically assess the effectiveness of intravenous combined topical tranexamic acid (combined TXA) in spinal surgery to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central was conducted for RCTs and comparative cohort studies evaluating the effect of combined TXA on blood loss in spinal surgery. Outcomes such as intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hemoglobin level on postoperative days 1 and 3, postoperative transfusion rates, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Five studies covering 528 patients were included in the analysis. Combined TXA, compared with intravenous TXA, showed no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.18 for RCTs, P = 0.50 for the retrospective study), total blood loss (P = 0.085 for RCTs, P = 0.87 for the retrospective study), postoperative drainage (P = 0.137 for RCTs, P = 0.232 for the retrospective study), postoperative hemoglobin (P = 0.737 on postoperative day 1, P = 0.403 on postoperative day 3), postoperative transfusion rates (P = 0.202), and complications (P = 0.493).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidences, our meta-analysis failed to demonstrate the apparent advantages of combined tranexamic acid in spinal surgery. Clinical decisions regarding hemostatic methods should continue to be individualized based on the patient's specific situation and the doctor's experience.

摘要

背景

静脉联合局部应用氨甲环酸的疗效存在争议。我们开展本研究以系统评估静脉联合局部应用氨甲环酸(联合应用氨甲环酸)在脊柱手术中的有效性,以指导临床实践。

方法

按照PRISMA指南进行文献回顾。对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和考克兰中央对照试验注册库进行系统检索,以查找评估联合应用氨甲环酸对脊柱手术失血影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和比较队列研究。分析术中失血、总失血量、术后引流量、术后第1天和第3天的术后血红蛋白水平、术后输血率及并发症等结局指标。

结果

纳入分析的有5项研究,共528例患者。与静脉应用氨甲环酸相比,联合应用氨甲环酸在术中失血(RCT中P = 0.18,回顾性研究中P = 0.50)、总失血量(RCT中P = 0.085,回顾性研究中P = 0.87)、术后引流量(RCT中P = 0.137,回顾性研究中P = 0.232)、术后血红蛋白水平(术后第1天P = 0.737,术后第3天P = 0.403)、术后输血率(P = 0.202)及并发症(P = 0.493)方面均无显著差异。

结论

基于现有证据,我们的荟萃分析未能证明联合应用氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的明显优势。关于止血方法的临床决策应继续根据患者的具体情况和医生的经验进行个体化选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a0d/11673842/1b526f582723/12891_2024_8191_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验