Baygın Melike, Çakiris Aris, Yabacı Tak Ayşegül, Abacı Neslihan, Ekmekçi Sema Sırma, Gürkan Köseoğlu Banu
Istanbul University Institute of Graduate Studies in Health Sciences, Bozdoğan Kemeri Caddesi No:4 Vezneciler Hamamı Sokağı Vezneciler, Fatih/İstanbul, 34126, Turkey.
Aziz Sancar Institute Of Experimental Medicine, Department Of Genetics, Istanbul University, Vakif Gureba Cad. Sehremini, Istanbul, 34093, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):1552. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05223-4.
To compare the effects of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF) and leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) on osteoblasts.
Venous blood samples were collected from ten volunteer patients to obtain T-PRF and L-PRF. The T-PRF group was labelled as Group T, the L-PRF group as Group L, and the control group, which includes only osteoblasts, was Group K. PRF samples were added to cultured osteoblast cells and cell proliferation was assessed using an MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay. The effect of different groups on osteoblast proliferation was observed for 72 h and the results were analysed statistically. Additionally, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was conducted to evaluate gene expression levels of COL1A1, ALP, OCN, and RUNX2 within 48 h.
We found that the MTT results at 24 h were significantly lower than those at 48 and 72 h (p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively). L-PRF levels showed an increase from 24 to 48 h followed by a decrease from 48 to 72 h. T-PRF levels were seen to increase at both the 24-48 h and 48-72-hour intervals. The changes in the COLA1, OCN, ALP, and RUNX2 genes at 24 h and 48 h did not significantly differ among the groups (p > 0.05).
In this study, we investigated the effects of T-PRF and L-PRF on osteoblast proliferation over a 72-hour period. Both groups improved osteoblast proliferation, however T-PRF group showed a consistent increase in osteoblast proliferation up to 72 h, in contrast to the L-PRF group. No differences in gene expression were found. However, osteoblastic marker genes can be significantly expressed over longer time periods. Therefore, long-term studies are needed.
比较钛制备的富血小板纤维蛋白(T-PRF)和富白细胞血小板纤维蛋白(L-PRF)对成骨细胞的影响。
从10名志愿者患者采集静脉血样本以获取T-PRF和L-PRF。T-PRF组标记为T组,L-PRF组标记为L组,仅包含成骨细胞的对照组为K组。将PRF样本添加到培养的成骨细胞中,使用MTT(3-[4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基]-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐)法评估细胞增殖。观察不同组对成骨细胞增殖的影响72小时,并对结果进行统计学分析。此外,进行实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)以评估48小时内COL1A1、ALP、OCN和RUNX2的基因表达水平。
我们发现24小时时的MTT结果显著低于48小时和72小时时的结果(分别为p = 0.036和p < 0.001)。L-PRF水平在24至48小时升高,随后在48至72小时降低。T-PRF水平在24 - 48小时和48 - 72小时两个时间段均升高。24小时和48小时时,COLA1、OCN、ALP和RUNX2基因的变化在各组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
在本研究中,我们在72小时期间研究了T-PRF和L-PRF对成骨细胞增殖的影响。两组均改善了成骨细胞增殖,但与L-PRF组相比,T-PRF组在长达72小时内成骨细胞增殖持续增加。未发现基因表达存在差异。然而,成骨细胞标记基因可能在更长时间段显著表达。因此,需要进行长期研究。