Guerra Paulo Henrique, Sposito Letícia Aparecida Calderão, Umpierre Daniel, Florindo Alex Antonio
Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro 15385-000, Brazil.
Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil.
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;5(4):796-804. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5040054.
: The present study aims to identify information from health research studies that have used a mixed-methods data collection approach, considering the combination of face-to-face and telephone interviews (referred to as the MMFT approach), specifically focusing on identifying themes, objectives, designs, populations involved, and implementation processes. : A scoping review was developed, with systematic searches performed in March 2024 across five databases, namely, PubMed; SciELO; Scopus; Web of Science; as well as Google Scholar and reference lists. The inclusion criteria were defined under the following categories: "Participants" (observational epidemiological studies, with no restrictions as to where they were carried out, sampling techniques, or sample profiles); "Concept" (use of MMFT in data collection), and "Context" (studies carried out in the health area, with no restrictions on the theme/subject). The review process was carried out by three researchers who worked independently. : From the initial 1515 potential references, the synthesis of this review included data from seven original studies, highlighting cross-sectional designs, involvement of adults and/or elderly people without specific health conditions, variability between data collection strategies, and complementary use of online approaches. : Based on the evidence generated, it is recommended that future studies assess aspects of the MMFT approach in terms of response rate, cost reduction, and increasing the speed of conducting health surveys.
本研究旨在从采用混合方法数据收集方式的健康研究中识别信息,该方式考虑了面对面访谈和电话访谈的结合(称为MMFT方法),特别侧重于识别主题、目标、设计、涉及的人群以及实施过程。
开展了一项范围综述,于2024年3月在五个数据库中进行系统检索,这五个数据库分别是:PubMed、SciELO、Scopus、科学网以及谷歌学术和参考文献列表。纳入标准在以下类别中定义:“参与者”(观察性流行病学研究,对其开展地点、抽样技术或样本概况无限制);“概念”(在数据收集中使用MMFT),以及“背景”(在健康领域开展的研究,对主题/课题无限制)。综述过程由三名独立工作的研究人员进行。
从最初的1515篇潜在参考文献中,本综述的综合分析纳入了七项原始研究的数据,突出了横断面设计、无特定健康状况的成年人和/或老年人的参与、数据收集策略之间的差异以及在线方法的补充使用。
基于所产生的证据,建议未来的研究从应答率、成本降低以及提高健康调查开展速度等方面评估MMFT方法的各个方面。