Sowmya B R, Nayak Aarati, Kottrashetti Vijaylakshmi S, Ingalagi Preeti, Harish Gandla
Department of Periodontology, Maratha Mandal's Nathajirao G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Maratha Mandal's Nathajirao G. Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 May-Jun;28(3):325-331. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_428_23. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Mechanical therapy along with adjunctive therapy, using agents like chlorhexidine digluconate mouthwash helps to disrupt the plaque biofilm. Recently, herbs with medicinal value have been tested for their antimicrobial properties. The present study was designed to assess the anti-biofilm activity of against some periodontal pathogens in an artificially synthesized dental biofilm.
The aqueous extract of was constituted and its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against standard strains of some periodontal pathogens was determined. A total of 21 biofilm samples were synthesized on extracted teeth and microtiter plates, and these were divided into two groups of 10 samples each. One group was treated with the predetermined MIC values of , while the other group was treated with chlorhexidine. The anti-biofilm activity of both compounds was assessed by calculating colony-forming units (CFUs) for the extracted teeth and optical density (OD) values for the microtiter plates.
The mean CFU at baseline was 55,000/μl while posttreatment with chlorhexidine digluconate and aqueous extract of was 23,280 ± 5274.00 and 28,560 ± 4509.545/μl, respectively. The mean OD value (at 595 nm) posttreatment with chlorhexidine digluconate was 0.9876 ± 0.49179 and was 1.4990 ± 0.37851. Results indicate that the aqueous extract of showed an inhibitory effect on biofilm obtained on microtiter plates and the one constituted on extracted teeth.
Anti-biofilm activity of aqueous extract of was appreciable and also comparable to that of chlorhexidine digluconate, both on extracted teeth and microtiter plates.
机械治疗与辅助治疗相结合,使用葡萄糖酸洗必泰漱口水等药物有助于破坏菌斑生物膜。最近,具有药用价值的草药已被测试其抗菌特性。本研究旨在评估[草药名称未给出]对人工合成牙菌斑生物膜中某些牙周病原体的抗生物膜活性。
制备[草药名称未给出]的水提取物,并测定其对某些牙周病原体标准菌株的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。在拔除的牙齿和微量滴定板上共合成了21个生物膜样本,并将其分为两组,每组10个样本。一组用预先确定的[草药名称未给出]MIC值处理,另一组用洗必泰处理。通过计算拔除牙齿的菌落形成单位(CFU)和微量滴定板的光密度(OD)值来评估两种化合物的抗生物膜活性。
基线时平均CFU为55,000/μl,而用葡萄糖酸洗必泰和[草药名称未给出]水提取物处理后分别为23,280±5274.00和28,560±4509.545/μl。用葡萄糖酸洗必泰处理后平均OD值(在595nm处)为0.9876±0.49179,[草药名称未给出]为1.4990±0.37851。结果表明,[草药名称未给出]水提取物对微量滴定板上获得的生物膜以及在拔除牙齿上形成的生物膜均有抑制作用。
[草药名称未给出]水提取物在拔除牙齿和微量滴定板上的抗生物膜活性均显著,且与葡萄糖酸洗必泰相当。