• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们塑造的心灵:对心智理论与人工智能的哲学探究

The Minds We Make: A Philosophical Inquiry into Theory of Mind and Artificial Intelligence.

作者信息

Yıldız Tolga

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Istanbul University, Laleli, Istanbul, 34134, Turkey.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2025 Jan 2;59(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09876-2.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-024-09876-2
PMID:39743649
Abstract

This theoretical paper offers an in-depth examination of the intersection between Theory of Mind (ToM) and artificial intelligence (AI), drawing on developmental psychology and philosophical analysis. By investigating the key developmental stages at which children begin to understand that others have distinct mental states, the paper provides a framework for assessing the cognitive boundaries of AI systems. It critically interrogates the pervasive human inclination to anthropomorphize machines, particularly through the attribution of complex mental states like "knowing," "thinking," or "believing" to AI entities that lack subjective experience. The paper argues that AI, while capable of simulating cognitive processes, operates without the conscious awareness that defines human cognition, raising profound epistemological and ethical questions. It explores the broader implications of this projection for society, considering how our conceptualization of AI affects both technological development and social structures. Ultimately, this interdisciplinary inquiry calls for a more nuanced understanding of the distinctions between human and machine cognition, advocating for responsible approaches to AI as its capabilities evolve.

摘要

这篇理论性论文利用发展心理学和哲学分析,对心理理论(ToM)与人工智能(AI)的交叉领域进行了深入研究。通过调查儿童开始理解他人具有不同心理状态的关键发展阶段,本文提供了一个评估人工智能系统认知边界的框架。它批判性地质问了人类普遍存在的将机器拟人化的倾向,特别是通过将诸如“知道”“思考”或“相信”等复杂心理状态归因于缺乏主观体验的人工智能实体。论文认为,人工智能虽然能够模拟认知过程,但它的运行缺乏定义人类认知的有意识的觉知,这引发了深刻的认识论和伦理问题。它探讨了这种投射对社会的更广泛影响,考虑我们对人工智能的概念化如何影响技术发展和社会结构。最终,这种跨学科探究呼吁对人类和机器认知之间的区别有更细致入微的理解,随着人工智能能力的发展,倡导对其采取负责任的方法。

相似文献

1
The Minds We Make: A Philosophical Inquiry into Theory of Mind and Artificial Intelligence.我们塑造的心灵:对心智理论与人工智能的哲学探究
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2025 Jan 2;59(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09876-2.
2
Knowing me, knowing you: theory of mind in AI.知己知彼:人工智能中的心理理论。
Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1057-1061. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720000835. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
The Efficacy of Conversational AI in Rectifying the Theory-of-Mind and Autonomy Biases: Comparative Analysis.对话式人工智能纠正心理理论和自主性偏差的功效:比较分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 7;12:e64396. doi: 10.2196/64396.
4
Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Workforce Management and Policymaking: Bridging Philosophy and Practice.护理劳动力管理与政策制定中的伦理人工智能:弥合哲学与实践的差距
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Apr 8;2025:7954013. doi: 10.1155/jonm/7954013. eCollection 2025.
5
Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines.道德机器语境中的跨学科混乱与解决
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 May 19;28(3):24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00378-1.
6
Socially intelligent machines that learn from humans and help humans learn.具有社会智能、能够向人类学习并帮助人类学习的机器。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Jul 24;381(2251):20220048. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0048. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
Theory of Mind and Preference Learning at the Interface of Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and AI: A Review.认知科学、神经科学与人工智能交叉领域的心理理论与偏好学习:综述
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Apr 5;5:778852. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.778852. eCollection 2022.
8
The emergence of mind and brain: an evolutionary, computational, and philosophical approach.心智与大脑的出现:一种进化、计算与哲学的进路
Prog Brain Res. 2008;168:115-32. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)68010-8.
9
What makes AI 'intelligent' and 'caring'? Exploring affect and relationality across three sites of intelligence and care.人工智能的“智能”和“关怀”体现在何处?跨越智能和关怀的三个领域探索情感和关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113874. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113874. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistics is not measurement: The inbuilt semantics of psychometric scales and language-based models obscures crucial epistemic differences.统计学并非测量:心理测量量表和基于语言的模型的内在语义掩盖了关键的认知差异。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1534270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534270. eCollection 2025.
2
Conversational AI in Pediatric Mental Health: A Narrative Review.儿科心理健康中的对话式人工智能:叙事性综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;12(3):359. doi: 10.3390/children12030359.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans.测试大语言模型和人类的心理理论。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jul;8(7):1285-1295. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01882-z. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Theory of Mind and Preference Learning at the Interface of Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and AI: A Review.认知科学、神经科学与人工智能交叉领域的心理理论与偏好学习:综述
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Apr 5;5:778852. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.778852. eCollection 2022.
3
Human-Computer Interaction Problem in Learning: Could the Key Be Hidden Somewhere Between Social Interaction and Development of Tools?
学习中的人机交互问题:关键是否隐藏在社交互动与工具开发之间的某个地方?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Sep;53(3):541-557. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09484-5.
4
False-belief understanding in infants.婴儿的错误信念理解。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
5
The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs.关于错误信念推理中的知识诅咒。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):382-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01909.x.
6
Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.心理理论发展的元分析:关于错误信念的真相
Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):655-84. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00304.
7
A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development.一项关于语言与心理理论发展之间关系的纵向研究。
Dev Psychol. 1999 Sep;35(5):1311-20. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.5.1311.
8
Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception.关于信念的信念:幼儿对欺骗理解中错误信念的表征与约束功能
Cognition. 1983 Jan;13(1):103-28. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5.