• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌微创手术的增加与机器人手术的采用有关。

Rise in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Robotic Surgery.

作者信息

Manisundaram Naveen, Childers Christopher P, Hu Chung-Yuan, Uppal Abhineet, Konishi Tsuyoshi, Bednarski Brian K, White Michael G, Peacock Oliver, You Y Nancy, Chang George J

机构信息

Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Apr 1;68(4):426-436. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617
PMID:39745312
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved short-term outcomes and similar long-term oncologic outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer compared with open surgery. Although the robotic approach has ergonomic and technical benefits, how it has impacted the utilization of traditional laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive surgery overall is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Describe trends in open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches for colorectal cancer resections and examine factors associated with minimally invasive surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2020.

SETTING

Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities.

PATIENTS

Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surgical approach rates (open, robotic, and laparoscopic).

RESULTS

We identified 475,001 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, of whom 192,237 (40.5%) underwent open surgery, 64,945 (13.7%) underwent robotic surgery, and 217,819 (45.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. For colon cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery use steadily increased, with a peak prevalence of 54.0% in 2016, and total minimally invasive surgery (robotic + laparoscopic) was performed more often than open surgery from 2013 through 2020. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery had a peak prevalence of 37.2% in 2014 and declined from 2014 through 2020; robotic surgery prevalence increased throughout the study period (5.5% in 2010, 24.7% in 2015, and 48.8% in 2020). Minimally invasive surgery use increased in facilities performing robotic surgery every year during the study period. For both colon and rectal cancer, the use of open surgery decreased across all facilities throughout the study period.

LIMITATIONS

This study used the National Cancer Database, which may not be generalizable to non-Commission on Cancer institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery steadily increased across all facilities from 2010 through 2020. Open resections declined, laparoscopic resections plateaued, and robotic resections increased for colon and rectal cancer. Minimally invasive surgery increases may be driven by increases in robot-assisted surgery. See Video Abstract.

EL AUMENTO DE LA CIRUGA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL SE ASOCIA CON LA ADOPCIN A LA CIRUGA ROBTICA

ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía mínimamente invasiva se asocia con mejores resultados a corto plazo y resultados oncológicos similares a largo plazo para pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en comparación con la cirugía abierta. Aunque el abordaje robótico tiene beneficios ergonómicos y técnicos, no está claro cómo ha afectado la utilización de la cirugía laparoscópica tradicional y la cirugía mínimamente invasiva en general.OBJETIVO:Describir las tendencias en los abordajes abiertos, robóticos y laparoscópicos para las resecciones de cáncer colorrectal y examinar los factores asociados con la cirugía mínimamente invasiva.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando datos de la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer desde 2010 hasta 2020.ESCENARIO:Centros estadounidenses acreditados por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer.PACIENTES:Pacientes diagnosticados con adenocarcinoma de colon o recto no metastásico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Tasas de abordaje quirúrgico (abierto, robótico, laparoscópico).RESULTADOS:Identificamos 475.001 pacientes con diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma colorrectal no metastásico, de los cuales 192.237 (40,5%) se sometieron a cirugía abierta, 64.945 (13,7%) se sometieron a cirugía robótica y 217.819 (45,9%) se sometieron a cirugía laparoscópica. Para el cáncer de colon, el uso de cirugía mínimamente invasiva laparoscópica aumentó de manera constante, con una prevalencia máxima del 54,0% en 2016, y la cirugía mínimamente invasiva total (robótica + laparoscópica) se realizó con mayor frecuencia que la cirugía abierta desde 2013 hasta 2020. Para el cáncer de recto, la cirugía mínimamente invasiva laparoscópica tuvo una prevalencia máxima del 37,2% en 2014 y disminuyó desde 2014 hasta 2020; La prevalencia de la cirugía robótica aumentó durante el período de estudio (5,5 % en 2010, 24,7 % en 2015, 48,8 % en 2020). El uso de cirugía mínimamente invasiva aumentó en los centros que realizan cirugía robótica cada año durante el período de estudio. Tanto para el cáncer de colon como para el cáncer de recto, el uso de cirugía abierta disminuyó en todos los centros durante el período de estudio.LIMITACIONES:Se utilizó la base de datos nacional sobre el cáncer, que puede no ser generalizable a instituciones que no pertenecen a la Comisión sobre el Cáncer.CONCLUSIONES:La cirugía mínimamente invasiva aumentó de manera constante en todos los centros entre 2010 y 2020. Las resecciones abiertas disminuyeron, las resecciones laparoscópicas se estabilizaron y las resecciones robóticas aumentaron para el cáncer de colon y recto. Los aumentos de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva pueden estar impulsados por aumentos en la cirugía asistida por robot. (Traducción--Ingrid Melo ).

摘要

背景

与开放手术相比,微创手术可改善结直肠癌患者的短期预后,并具有相似的长期肿瘤学预后。尽管机器人手术方法具有人体工程学和技术优势,但它如何影响传统腹腔镜手术和整体微创手术的应用尚不清楚。

目的

描述结直肠癌切除术的开放、机器人和腹腔镜手术方法的趋势,并研究与微创手术相关的因素。

设计

使用2010年至2020年美国国家癌症数据库的数据进行回顾性队列研究。

地点

美国癌症委员会认证的机构。

患者

诊断为非转移性结肠或直肠腺癌的患者。

主要观察指标

手术方法使用率(开放、机器人和腹腔镜)。

结果

我们确定了475001例诊断为非转移性结直肠腺癌的患者,其中192237例(40.5%)接受了开放手术,64945例(13.7%)接受了机器人手术,217819例(45.9%)接受了腹腔镜手术。对于结肠癌,腹腔镜微创手术的使用率稳步上升,2016年达到峰值54.0%,从2013年到2020年,整体微创手术(机器人手术+腹腔镜手术)的实施频率高于开放手术。对于直肠癌,腹腔镜微创手术在2014年达到峰值37.2%,从2014年到2020年有所下降;机器人手术的使用率在整个研究期间均有所上升(2010年为5.5%,2015年为24.7%,2020年为48.8%)。在研究期间,每年进行机器人手术的机构中微创手术的使用率都有所增加。对于结肠癌和直肠癌,在整个研究期间,所有机构的开放手术使用率均有所下降。

局限性

本研究使用了美国国家癌症数据库,其结果可能不适用于非癌症委员会认证的机构。

结论

从2010年到2020年,所有机构的微创手术使用率稳步上升。结肠癌和直肠癌的开放切除术减少,腹腔镜切除术趋于平稳,机器人切除术增加。微创手术的增加可能是由机器人辅助手术的增加推动的。见视频摘要。

结直肠癌微创手术的增加与机器人手术的采用有关

背景:与开放手术相比,微创手术与结直肠癌患者更好的短期结果和相似的长期肿瘤学结果相关。尽管机器人手术方法具有人体工程学和技术优势,但尚不清楚它如何影响传统腹腔镜手术和一般微创手术的使用。目的:描述结直肠癌切除术的开放、机器人和腹腔镜手术方法的趋势,并检查与微创手术相关的因素。设计:使用2010年至2020年国家癌症数据库的数据进行回顾性队列研究。背景:美国癌症委员会认可的设施。患者:诊断为非转移性结肠或直肠腺癌的患者。主要评估指标:手术方法率(开放、机器人、腹腔镜)。结果:我们确定了475,001例诊断为非转移性结直肠腺癌的患者,其中192,237例(40.5%)接受了开放手术,64,945例(13.7%)接受了机器人手术,217,819例(45.9%)接受了腹腔镜手术。对于结肠癌,腹腔镜微创手术的使用稳步增加,2016年的最高患病率为54.0%,从2013年到2020年,总体微创手术(机器人手术+腹腔镜手术)的执行频率高于开放手术。对于直肠癌,腹腔镜微创手术在2014年的最高患病率为37.2%,从2014年到2020年有所下降;机器人手术的患病率在整个研究期间增加(2010年为5.5%,201

相似文献

1
Rise in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Robotic Surgery.结直肠癌微创手术的增加与机器人手术的采用有关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Apr 1;68(4):426-436. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Oral Antibiotics Bowel Preparation Without Mechanical Preparation for Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgeries: Current Practice and Future Prospects.口服抗生素肠道准备不联合机械肠道准备用于微创结直肠手术:当前实践与未来展望。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Sep 1;65(9):e897-e906. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002096. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
3
Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resections of Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer.非转移性结肠癌的机器人、腹腔镜和开放性切除术比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Oct 1;66(10):1347-1358. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002637. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
The Impact of Prolonged Operative Time Associated With Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Report From the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.微创手术相关的手术时间延长对预后的影响:外科手术质量评估计划报告。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Feb 1;67(2):302-312. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002925. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Textbook Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Total Mesorectal Excision: A Composite Tool to Assess and Compare Outcomes for Benchmarking.微创全直肠系膜切除术的教科书式结局:一种用于评估和比较结局以进行基准测试的综合工具。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Sep 1;68(9):1042-1051. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003837. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
6
Reevaluating Preoperative Type and Screen: Identifying When It Is Necessary for Elective Colorectal Surgery.重新评估术前血型鉴定和抗体筛查:确定择期结直肠手术时何时有必要进行此项检查。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Sep 1;68(9):1093-1099. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003844. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
7
Emergent and Urgent Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis in the United States in the Minimally Invasive and Biologic Era.美国微创和生物时代溃疡性结肠炎的紧急手术治疗。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Aug 1;65(8):1025-1033. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002109. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
8
Navigating Progress: 8-Year Single-Center Experience With Minimally Invasive Proctectomy and IPAA.导航进展:微创直肠切除术和 IPAA 的 8 年单中心经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Nov 1;67(11):1437-1442. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003465. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
9
Frailer Patients Undergoing Robotic Colectomies for Colon Cancer Experience Increased Complication Rates Compared With Open or Laparoscopic Approaches.对于接受机器人结肠癌切除术的体弱患者而言,其并发症发生率较开放性或腹腔镜手术更高。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):588-597. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001598.
10
A Comparative Analysis of Short-term Patient Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Rectal Surgery.腹腔镜与机器人直肠手术短期患者结局的对比分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Oct 1;65(10):1274-1278. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002157. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: A multidimensional review.结直肠癌的外科治疗:多维综述。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):107785. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107785.
2
National adoption of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for oncologic lung resections.全国范围内采用机器人辅助胸腔镜手术进行肿瘤性肺切除。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 4;19(1):557. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02727-1.
3
[Transition phase to robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a comparative consecutive cohort study].[结直肠癌机器人辅助手术的过渡阶段:一项比较性连续队列研究]

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌(REAL):一项多中心随机对照试验的短期结果
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):991-1004. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00248-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
The RECOURSE Study: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Associated With Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Procedures for Endometrial, Cervical, Colorectal, Lung, or Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.RECOURSE 研究:机器人辅助微创治疗子宫内膜癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌、肺癌或前列腺癌的长期肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):387-396. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005698. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02316-w.
Robotic Approach is Associated With a Lower Conversion Rate Compared to Laparoscopic Approach for Patients Undergoing Colectomy for T4b Colon Cancer. An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术相比,在接受 T4b 结肠癌结肠切除术的患者中,其转换率更低。国家癌症数据库的分析。
Surg Innov. 2023 Apr;30(2):193-200. doi: 10.1177/15533506221125323. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Implementation of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional nationwide study.机器人直肠癌手术的实施:一项全国性的横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):912-920. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09568-1. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.癌症手术后的医疗资源利用:微创手术的价值。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7549-7560. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09189-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.国家间微创结直肠癌手术实施的差异及其对短期结局的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5986-6001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08974-1. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
7
Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.结肠癌临床实践指南(2021 年第 2 版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 2;19(3):329-359. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012.
8
The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.手术入路对老年直肠癌患者直肠切除术后短期和长期结局的影响:国家癌症数据库倾向评分匹配比较机器人、腹腔镜和开放入路。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1269-1277. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08401-5. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
9
Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade.澳大利亚的机器人结直肠手术:十余年的发展历程。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2330-2336. doi: 10.1111/ans.16554. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
Robotic rectal cancer surgery: comparative study of the impact of obesity on early outcomes.机器人直肠癌手术:肥胖对早期结果影响的对比研究。
Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):1552-1557. doi: 10.1002/bjs.12023. Epub 2020 Sep 30.