Karstoft Karen-Inge, Vindbjerg Erik, Nielsen Anni B S, Andersen Søren Bo, Folke Sofie
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Research and Knowledge Centre, Danish Veterans Centre, Ringsted, Denmark.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2444745. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2444745. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
A number of studies have tested the factor structure of the suggested ICD-11 symptom criteria for PTSD and complex PTSD (CPTSD) across various trauma populations, finding support for two different models in line with the ICD-11 theoretical rationale. Here, we aim to explore the factor structure of the Danish version of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) by testing two alternative factor models that have previously gained support in a large sample of treatment-seeking veterans. Treatment-seeking Danish soldiers and veterans ( = 599) recruited from the Military Psychology Department in the Danish Defence completed the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess fit of a first-order and a second-order model. Both models fit the data well but displayed latent variable correlations above 1 and negative variances (known as Heywood cases), indicating model misspecification or other problems. The specification problems included the latent variable Affect Dysregulation. Based on our results and results reported in previous CFAs of the ITQ, we suggest consideration of the proposed models. While many previous studies did find support for the models with no indications of misfit, others find Heywood cases concerning the same items and latent variables as our analysis. Hence, models of (C)PTSD based on the ITQ should be carefully evaluated and interpreted.
许多研究已经在不同的创伤人群中测试了国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)建议的症状标准的因子结构,发现符合ICD - 11理论依据的两种不同模型得到了支持。在此,我们旨在通过测试两种先前在大量寻求治疗的退伍军人样本中获得支持的替代因子模型,来探索丹麦版国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的因子结构。从丹麦国防部军事心理学部招募的寻求治疗的丹麦士兵和退伍军人(n = 599)完成了国际创伤问卷(ITQ)。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于评估一阶模型和二阶模型的拟合度。两个模型对数据的拟合都很好,但显示潜在变量相关性高于1且方差为负(即海伍德情况),表明模型设定错误或存在其他问题。设定问题包括潜在变量情感失调。基于我们的结果以及之前ITQ的CFA报告结果,我们建议考虑所提出的模型。虽然许多先前的研究确实发现这些模型得到了支持且没有不拟合的迹象,但其他研究发现与我们的分析中相同的项目和潜在变量存在海伍德情况。因此,基于ITQ的(C)PTSD模型应仔细评估和解释。