Hertel Anne G, Parres Aida, Frank Shane C, Renaud Julien, Selva Nuria, Zedrosser Andreas, Balkenhol Niko, Maiorano Luigi, Fedorca Ancuta, Dutta Trishna, Bogdanović Neda, Bragalanti Natalia, Chiriac Silviu, Ćirović Duško, Ciucci Paolo, Domokos Csaba, Fedorca Mihai, Filacorda Stefano, Finďo Slavomir, Groff Claudio, de Gabriel Hernando Miguel, Huber Djuro, Ionescu Georgeta, Jerina Klemen, Karamanlidis Alexandros A, Kindberg Jonas, Kojola Ilpo, Mertzanis Yorgos, Palazon Santiago, Pop Mihai I, Psaralexi Maria, Quenette Pierre Yves, Sergiel Agnieszka, Skuban Michaela, Zlatanova Diana, Zwijacz-Kozica Tomasz, De Barba Marta
Behavioural Ecology, Department of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jan;31(1):e70011. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70011.
Three-quarters of the planet's land surface has been altered by humans, with consequences for animal ecology, movements and related ecosystem functioning. Species often occupy wide geographical ranges with contrasting human disturbance and environmental conditions, yet, limited data availability across species' ranges has constrained our understanding of how human pressure and resource availability jointly shape intraspecific variation of animal space use. Leveraging a unique dataset of 758 annual GPS movement trajectories from 375 brown bears (Ursus arctos) across the species' range in Europe, we investigated the effects of human pressure (i.e., human footprint index), resource availability and predictability, forest cover and disturbance, and area-based conservation measures on brown bear space use. We quantified space use at different spatiotemporal scales during the growing season (May-September): home range size; representing general space requirements, 10-day long-distance displacement distances, and routine 1-day displacement distances. We found large intraspecific variation in brown bear space use across all scales, which was profoundly affected by human footprint index, vegetation productivity, and recent forest disturbances creating opportunity for resource pulses. Bears occupied smaller home ranges and moved less in more anthropized landscapes and in areas with higher resource availability and predictability. Forest disturbances reduced space use while contiguous forest cover promoted longer daily movements. The amount of strictly protected and roadless areas within bear home ranges was too small to affect space use. Anthropized landscapes may hinder the expansion of small and isolated populations, such as the Apennine and Pyrenean, and obstruct population connectivity, for example between the Dinaric Pindos population and the Alpine or Carpathian population. Our findings call for actions to maintain bear movements across landscapes with high human footprint, for example by maintaining forest integrity, to support viable bear populations and their ecosystem functions.
地球上四分之三的陆地表面已被人类改变,这对动物生态、活动及相关生态系统功能产生了影响。物种通常占据广泛的地理范围,面临着截然不同的人类干扰和环境条件,然而,跨物种分布范围的数据可用性有限,这限制了我们对人类压力和资源可用性如何共同塑造动物空间利用种内变异的理解。利用来自欧洲375只棕熊( Ursus arctos)的758条年度GPS运动轨迹的独特数据集,我们研究了人类压力(即人类足迹指数)、资源可用性和可预测性、森林覆盖和干扰以及基于面积的保护措施对棕熊空间利用的影响。我们在生长季节(5月至9月)的不同时空尺度上量化了空间利用情况:家域大小,代表一般空间需求;10天的长距离位移距离,以及常规的1天位移距离。我们发现,在所有尺度上,棕熊的空间利用都存在很大的种内变异,这受到人类足迹指数、植被生产力以及近期森林干扰为资源脉冲创造机会的深刻影响。熊在人类活动更多的景观以及资源可用性和可预测性更高的地区占据较小的家域,活动较少。森林干扰减少了空间利用,而连片的森林覆盖促进了更长的日常移动。熊的家域内严格保护和无路区域的面积太小,无法影响空间利用。人类活动频繁的景观可能会阻碍小型孤立种群(如亚平宁和比利牛斯种群)的扩张,并阻碍种群连通性,例如迪纳拉-品都斯种群与阿尔卑斯或喀尔巴阡种群之间的连通性。我们的研究结果呼吁采取行动,例如通过维护森林完整性,来维持熊在人类足迹高的景观中的活动,以支持有生存能力的熊种群及其生态系统功能。