• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在资源有限的环境中为心力衰竭患者开发以用户为中心的慢性护理模式:一项协同设计研究。

Development of a User-Centred Chronic Care Model for Patients With Heart Failure in a Limited-Resource Setting: A Codesign Study.

作者信息

Koontalay Apinya, Botti Mari, Hutchinson Anastasia

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.

Center for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Epworth HealthCare Partnership, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70142. doi: 10.1111/hex.70142.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70142
PMID:39757357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702422/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health service leaders in Thailand face substantial challenges in addressing the needs of a growing population of patients with moderate to severe Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) who require acute care management and ongoing supportive care in the community. The large number of CHF patients requiring readmission for high-level care places a significant burden on healthcare services.

METHODS

The design thinking model proposed by the Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University underpinned an approach to developing a co-designed, tailored, culturally acceptable model of chronic care for people with CHF. One consumer, 16 clinicians, and two organisational leaders participated in a codesign workshop that included three activities. The purpose of each activity was to (i) define the problem, (ii) brainstorm possible solutions and (iii) develop a prototype solution. The codesign workshop was one phase of a four-phase codesign project. Data collected included physical data such as sticky notes and storyboards and audio recordings of codesign group discussions. Data were analyses using content analysis.

RESULTS

Nine prototype storyboards aimed at enhancing continuity of care for CHF patients emerged from the workshop activities. The proposed solutions focused on improving consumer access to evidence-based information, multidisciplinary expertise and ongoing community support. Participants discussed and evaluated the viability and feasibility of each prototype before reaching a final decision on an optimal model. The preferred model was a nurse-led case management service supported by a multidisciplinary team.

CONCLUSION

Key stakeholders identified the importance of moving from a short-term model of care to an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to providing long-term support in the community. The final agreed prototype of a CHF Nurse Case Management service supported by a multidisciplinary team with a focus on community outreach addressed the key concerns of participants and was considered a feasible approach to developing a CHF chronic care service for the community in urban Bangkok, Thailand.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The process of codesign involved the engagement and participation of individuals with CHF, clinicians and organisational leaders throughout the research process.

摘要

背景

泰国的医疗服务领导者在满足日益增长的中重度慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者群体的需求上面临重大挑战,这些患者需要急性护理管理以及社区的持续支持性护理。大量需要再次入院接受高级护理的CHF患者给医疗服务带来了巨大负担。

方法

斯坦福大学哈索·普拉特纳设计学院提出的设计思维模型为开发一种共同设计、量身定制、文化上可接受的CHF患者慢性护理模型提供了一种方法。一名患者、16名临床医生和两名组织领导者参加了一个包括三项活动的共同设计研讨会。每项活动的目的是:(i)定义问题,(ii)集思广益可能的解决方案,以及(iii)开发一个原型解决方案。该共同设计研讨会是一个四阶段共同设计项目的一个阶段。收集的数据包括便利贴和故事板等实物数据以及共同设计小组讨论的录音。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

研讨会上的活动产生了九个旨在增强CHF患者护理连续性的原型故事板。提出的解决方案侧重于改善患者获取循证信息、多学科专业知识和持续社区支持的机会。在就最佳模型做出最终决定之前,参与者讨论并评估了每个原型的可行性。首选模型是由多学科团队支持的护士主导的病例管理服务。

结论

关键利益相关者认识到从短期护理模式转向综合、多学科方法以在社区提供长期支持的重要性。由多学科团队支持、以社区外展为重点的CHF护士病例管理服务的最终商定原型解决了参与者的关键问题,并被认为是为泰国曼谷市区社区开发CHF慢性护理服务的可行方法。

患者或公众贡献

共同设计过程涉及CHF患者、临床医生和组织领导者在整个研究过程中的参与。

相似文献

1
Development of a User-Centred Chronic Care Model for Patients With Heart Failure in a Limited-Resource Setting: A Codesign Study.在资源有限的环境中为心力衰竭患者开发以用户为中心的慢性护理模式:一项协同设计研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70142. doi: 10.1111/hex.70142.
2
Codesign of Mental Health Interventions With Young People From Racially Minoritised Populations: A Systematic Review of Methods and Outcomes.与少数族裔青年共同设计心理健康干预措施:方法与结果的系统评价
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70204. doi: 10.1111/hex.70204.
3
Achieving consensus on the key elements of a nurse-led multidisciplinary chronic heart failure service in Thailand: An e-Delphi study.泰国护士主导的多学科慢性心力衰竭服务关键要素的共识达成:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Oct;81(10):6347-6363. doi: 10.1111/jan.16330. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
'It opened my eyes, my ears, and my heart': Codesigning a substance use disorder treatment programme.“它打开了我的眼睛、耳朵和心扉”:共同设计一种物质使用障碍治疗方案。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13908. doi: 10.1111/hex.13908. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
7
Integrating Palliative Care and Heart Failure: the PalliatHeartSynthesis realist synthesis.将姑息治疗与心力衰竭相结合:PalliatHeartSynthesis 真实综合。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(34):1-128. doi: 10.3310/FTRG5628.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Mixed-method exploratory study of general practitioner and nurse perceptions of a new community based nurse-led heart failure service.关于全科医生和护士对一项新的社区护士主导的心力衰竭服务看法的混合方法探索性研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;10(4):1510. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated Hospital-Territory Organizational Models and the Role of Family and Community Nurses in the Management of Chronic Conditions: A Scoping Review.综合医院-地区组织模式以及家庭和社区护士在慢性病管理中的作用:一项范围综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 28;61(7):1175. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071175.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving consensus on the key elements of a nurse-led multidisciplinary chronic heart failure service in Thailand: An e-Delphi study.泰国护士主导的多学科慢性心力衰竭服务关键要素的共识达成:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Oct;81(10):6347-6363. doi: 10.1111/jan.16330. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Illness perceptions of people living with chronic heart failure and limited community disease management.患有慢性心力衰竭和有限社区疾病管理人群的疾病认知。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Oct;33(10):4100-4111. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17335. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Narrative synthesis of the effectiveness and characteristics of heart failure disease self-management support programmes.
心力衰竭疾病自我管理支持方案的有效性和特点的叙述性综合。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jun;11(3):1329-1340. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14701. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
4
Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and key informant perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.在中低收入国家开展公共卫生共创:系统评价和主要知情人对实施障碍和促进因素的看法。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 17;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01014-2.
5
How to co-design a prototype of a clinical practice tool: a framework with practical guidance and a case study.如何共同设计临床实践工具原型:具有实用指导的框架和案例研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Mar 25;33(4):258-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016196.
6
Impact of Nurse Leaders Behaviors on Nursing Staff Performance: A Systematic Review of Literature.护士长行为对护理人员绩效的影响:文献系统评价。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231178528. doi: 10.1177/00469580231178528.
7
Sharing space at the research table: exploring public and patient involvement in a methodology priority setting partnership.在研究桌上共享空间:探索公众和患者参与方法学优先事项设定伙伴关系。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 2;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00438-1.
8
Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries.在中低收入国家的卫生服务研究中使用共同设计的潜力和挑战。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Mar 13;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00290-6.
9
Identifying gaps in global evidence for nurse staffing and patient care outcomes research in low/middle-income countries: an umbrella review.识别全球证据中护士人力配置和患者护理结局研究在中低收入国家的差距:伞式综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 12;12(10):e064050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064050.
10
Development of a Complex Intervention for Effective Management of Type 2 Diabetes in a Developing Country.为发展中国家有效管理2型糖尿病制定一项综合干预措施。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 22;11(5):1149. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051149.