Solleiro-Duran David, Cidre-Fuentes Pablo, Rey Ezequiel, Baena-Raya Andrés, Filter Alberto, Padrón-Cabo Alexis
University of A Coruña, Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, A Coruña, Spain.
High Performance Department, Olympique de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Biol Sport. 2025 Jan;42(1):89-97. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.139084. Epub 2024 May 24.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of linear sprint training (LST) compared to curvilinear sprint training (CST) using an equivalent session training volume, on linear (LS) and curvilinear (CS) sprint performance, horizontal force-velocity profile, and change of direction (COD) ability in young soccer players. In a randomized pre-post parallel-group trial design, nineteen U16 male soccer players were randomly assigned to LST (n = 9) and CST (n = 10) groups. Both groups performed 11 sprint training sessions over 6 weeks. Before and after the training period, LS (5 m, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m, and 30 m), CS (weak and good side), horizontal force-velocity profile, and COD speed (modified 505 test) were assessed. The LST showed small to moderate significant enhancements (p ≤ 0.05) in LS (except 5 m sprint), modified 505 test, theoretical maximal velocity (V), maximal power output (P), and maximal ratio of force (RF) from pre-test to post-test. CST resulted in small to moderate significant improvements (p ≤ 0.05) in 10 m, 20 m, and 30 m LS performance, weak and good sides of the CS, COD speed, and P from pre-test to post-test. In addition, significant between-group comparisons were observed between LST and CST for CS performance in both sides (p < 0.01). In conclusion, LST and CST seem to produce trajectory-specific adaptations in young soccer players. Therefore, strength and conditioning coaches should integrate both LST and CST training methods to effectively prepare soccer players and enhance their sprinting performance.
本研究的目的是，在同等训练量的情况下，比较直线冲刺训练（LST）和曲线冲刺训练（CST）对年轻足球运动员直线（LS）和曲线（CS）冲刺成绩、水平力-速度曲线以及变向（COD）能力的影响。在一项随机前后平行组试验设计中，19名16岁以下男性足球运动员被随机分为LST组（n = 9）和CST组（n = 10）。两组在6周内都进行了11次冲刺训练课。在训练期前后，评估了LS（5米、10米、15米、20米和30米）、CS（弱侧和强侧）、水平力-速度曲线以及COD速度（改良505测试）。从测试前到测试后，LST在LS（5米冲刺除外）、改良505测试、理论最大速度（V）、最大功率输出（P）以及最大力比（RF）方面显示出小到中度的显著提高（p≤0.05）。CST在10米、20米和30米的LS成绩、CS的弱侧和强侧、COD速度以及P方面，从测试前到测试后有小到中度的显著改善（p≤0.05）。此外，LST和CST在两侧CS成绩的组间比较中存在显著差异（p < 0.01）。总之，LST和CST似乎在年轻足球运动员中产生了特定轨迹的适应性变化。因此，体能教练应将LST和CST训练方法结合起来，以有效地为足球运动员做好准备并提高他们的冲刺成绩。
