Duijndam Stefanie, Karreman Annemiek, de Smet Melissa, Kupper Nina
Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases, Tilburg University, Netherlands.
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Netherlands.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;24(4):100532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100532. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
The current study aimed to identify patterns of emotion regulation and behaviors in specific uncomfortable situations using a sequential exploratory mixed methods design and to examine how the trait social inhibition (SI) is related to these patterns. The sample (N = 451, 66% female, M = 34 (SD=17.2)) collected in 2016-2017 completed the social inhibition questionnaire (SIQ15) and open-ended questions on self-indicated uncomfortable situations and the regulation of emotions and behaviors in those situations. The open-ended questions were analyzed and coded into quantitative data, after which a latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to (A) identify latent profiles of emotion regulation and behaviors in specific situations, and (B) to examine how SI and facets are related to these profiles. LPA revealed seven profiles that differed in the type of situation described and how people regulated their emotions and behaved in the situation. The results show that it is the type of situation which determines regulation style and behavior. Additionally, SI was found to rely on active avoidance to deal with uncomfortable social situations, while not using emotion regulation to modify how they feel in that situation. In conclusion, our findings show that context seems to be the most important factor that drives the choice or decision of how emotions are regulated. SI individuals tend not to use emotion regulation strategies but rely on active avoidance in dealing with uncomfortable situations. Importantly, the sample was mainly female and highly educated, suggesting that our results may not generalize to other populations.
本研究旨在采用序列探索性混合方法设计,确定特定不适情境下的情绪调节模式和行为,并考察特质社交抑制(SI)与这些模式之间的关系。2016 - 2017年收集的样本(N = 451,66%为女性,M = 34(标准差 = 17.2))完成了社交抑制问卷(SIQ15)以及关于自我指出的不适情境和这些情境中情绪与行为调节的开放式问题。对开放式问题进行分析并编码为定量数据,之后进行潜在剖面分析(LPA),以(A)识别特定情境下情绪调节和行为的潜在剖面,以及(B)考察SI及其各个方面与这些剖面的关系。LPA揭示了七个剖面,这些剖面在所描述的情境类型以及人们在情境中如何调节情绪和行为方面存在差异。结果表明,决定调节方式和行为的是情境类型。此外,发现SI个体依靠主动回避来应对不适的社交情境,而不使用情绪调节来改变他们在该情境中的感受。总之,我们的研究结果表明,情境似乎是驱动情绪调节方式选择或决策的最重要因素。SI个体在应对不适情境时往往不使用情绪调节策略,而是依靠主动回避。重要的是,样本主要是女性且受教育程度高,这表明我们的结果可能不适用于其他人群。