Department of Experimental Animal Facilities and Biorisk Management, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Institute of Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 15;87(3). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02019-20.
Airborne disinfection of high-containment facilities before maintenance or between animal studies is crucial. Commercial spore carriers (CSC) coated with 10 spores of are often used to assess the efficacy of disinfection. We used quantitative carrier testing (QCT) procedures to compare the sensitivity of CSC with that of surrogates for nonenveloped and enveloped viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), mycobacteria, and spores, to an aerosolized mixture of peroxyacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide (aPAA-HP). We then used the QCT methodology to determine relevant process parameters to develop and validate effective disinfection protocols (≥4-log reduction) in various large and complex facilities. Our results demonstrate that aPAA-HP is a highly efficient procedure for airborne room disinfection. Relevant process parameters such as temperature and relative humidity can be wirelessly monitored. Furthermore, we found striking differences in inactivation efficacies against some of the tested microorganisms. Overall, we conclude that dry fogging a mixture of aPAA-HP is highly effective against a broad range of microorganisms as well as material compatible with relevant concentrations. Furthermore, CSC are artificial bioindicators with lower resistance and thus should not be used for validating airborne disinfection when microorganisms other than viruses have to be inactivated. Airborne disinfection is not only of crucial importance for the safe operation of laboratories and animal rooms where infectious agents are handled but also can be used in public health emergencies such as the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. We show that dry fogging an aerosolized mixture of peroxyacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide (aPAA-HP) is highly microbicidal, efficient, fast, robust, environmentally neutral, and a suitable airborne disinfection method. In addition, the low concentration of dispersed disinfectant, particularly for enveloped viral pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, entails high material compatibility. For these reasons and due to the relative simplicity of the procedure, it is an ideal disinfection method for hospital wards, ambulances, public conveyances, and indoor community areas. Thus, we conclude that this method is an excellent choice for control of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
在进行维护或动物研究之间,对高隔离设施进行空气传播消毒至关重要。通常使用涂有 10 个孢子的商业孢子载体 (CSC) 来评估消毒效果。我们使用定量载体测试 (QCT) 程序来比较 CSC 与非包膜和包膜病毒的替代物(包括严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)、分枝杆菌和孢子)对过氧乙酸和过氧化氢气溶胶混合物(aPAA-HP)的敏感性。然后,我们使用 QCT 方法确定相关工艺参数,以在各种大型复杂设施中开发和验证有效的消毒方案(≥4 对数减少)。我们的结果表明,aPAA-HP 是一种高效的空气传播室内消毒程序。相关工艺参数(如温度和相对湿度)可以进行无线监测。此外,我们发现一些测试微生物的失活动力存在显著差异。总的来说,我们得出结论,过氧乙酸和过氧化氢的干雾混合是一种非常有效的方法,可以有效杀灭广泛的微生物以及与相关浓度兼容的材料。此外,CSC 是人工生物指示剂,其抗性较低,因此在必须灭活除病毒以外的微生物时,不应将其用于验证空气传播消毒。空气传播消毒不仅对处理传染病原的实验室和动物室的安全运行至关重要,而且在当前严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 大流行等公共卫生紧急情况下也可以使用。我们表明,过氧乙酸和过氧化氢的气溶胶化干雾混合(aPAA-HP)具有高度杀菌性、高效性、快速性、稳健性、环境中性和适合空气传播消毒的方法。此外,由于分散消毒剂的浓度低,特别是对于 SARS-CoV-2 等包膜病毒病原体,因此具有很高的材料兼容性。由于这些原因以及该过程相对简单,它是医院病房、救护车、公共交通工具和室内社区区域的理想消毒方法。因此,我们得出结论,这种方法是控制当前 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的绝佳选择。