Romero-Vera Luis, Ulloa-Díaz David, Araya-Sierralta Sergio, Guede-Rojas Francisco, Andrades-Ramírez Oscar, Carvajal-Parodi Claudio, Muñoz-Bustos Gustavo, Matamala-Aguilera María, Martínez-García Darío
Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela de Kinesiología, Magíster en Fisiología Clínica del Ejercicio, Universidad Mayor, Santiago 8580745, Chile.
Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Universidad Católica de la Santísima, Concepción 4030000, Chile.
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 14;14(12):1661. doi: 10.3390/life14121661.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (I) evaluate the evidence on the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in hypertensive patients; (II) determine whether HIIT impacts SBP and DBP differently; and (III) assess the clinical relevance of these effects.
A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, resulting in the inclusion of seven randomized clinical trials in the meta-analysis. The outcomes were analyzed using random-effects models to compute mean differences (MD) and standardized mean differences (SMD) for SBP and DBP.
A small reduction in SBP was observed with HIIT interventions (MD -3.00; 95% CI -4.61 to -1.39; < 0.0001; SMD -0.28; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.13; = 0.0003). However, no statistically significant reductions were detected for DBP (MD -0.70; 95% CI -1.80 to 0.39; = 0.21; SMD -0.07; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.08; = 0.35). Despite demonstrating statistical significance for SBP, the effects did not reach clinical relevance.
HIIT interventions yield small reductions in SBP, with minimal impact on DBP. These findings suggest limited clinical relevance in the management of hypertension. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to standardize HIIT protocols, with specific emphasis on intensity control and manipulation, to better understand their potential role in hypertensive populations.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在(I)评估高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对高血压患者收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)影响的证据;(II)确定HIIT对SBP和DBP的影响是否不同;以及(III)评估这些影响的临床相关性。
对多个电子数据库进行全面检索,最终纳入荟萃分析的有7项随机临床试验。使用随机效应模型分析结果,以计算SBP和DBP的平均差(MD)和标准化平均差(SMD)。
HIIT干预使SBP略有降低(MD -3.00;95%CI -4.61至-1.39;<0.0001;SMD -0.28;95%CI -0.42至-0.13;=0.0003)。然而,未检测到DBP有统计学意义的降低(MD -0.70;95%CI -1.80至0.39;=0.21;SMD -0.07;95%CI -0.22至0.08;=0.35)。尽管SBP的影响具有统计学意义,但这些影响未达到临床相关性。
HIIT干预使SBP略有降低,对DBP影响极小。这些发现表明其在高血压管理中的临床相关性有限。有必要进行进一步的随机对照试验,以规范HIIT方案,特别强调强度控制和调节,以便更好地了解其在高血压人群中的潜在作用。