Solaro Nadia, Giovanelli Luca, Bianchi Laura, Piterà Paolo, Verme Federica, Malacarne Mara, Pagani Massimo, Fontana Jacopo Maria, Capodaglio Paolo, Lucini Daniela
Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
BIOMETRA Department, University of Milan, 20129 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 18;13(24):7728. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247728.
: The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is considered one of the mechanisms mediating the benefits of whole-body cold stimulation (WBC). Nevertheless, different treatment protocols, different methodologies employed to assess the ANS, and, in particular, difficulties in interpreting the numerous variables obtained represent important barriers to understanding the effects of WBC on the ANS. The present study aimed to explore the effects of WBC on cardiac autonomic control (CAR) as assessed using a single composite percentile-ranked proxy of autonomic balance (ANSI), considering two different WBC temperatures and the same WBC protocol. : Heart rate variability (HRV) was employed to assess the ANS in 23 subjects with obesity who underwent 10 WBC sessions, studied before and after 2 min WBC at -55 °C (15 subjects) or 2 min WBC at -110 °C (8 subjects) both at the first session (T1) and the last one (T10). To overcome some important barriers in data interpretation and age/sex bias, we considered the Autonomic Nervous System Index (ANSI), a single composite percentile-ranked proxy of autonomic control. : We observed an improvement in CAR independently of the employed temperature. Both treatments, without distinction, caused a significant increase in the ANSI post-WBC treatment both at T1 and T10 and a significant betterment of the total power of the RR interval variability from pre- to post-treatment at T1 and overall from T1 to T10. : WBC was capable of inducing an immediate change in the ANS control (pre- vs. post-treatment both at T1 and T10) and a long-term modulation in cardiac autonomic control (T1-pre vs. T10-pre).
自主神经系统(ANS)被认为是介导全身冷刺激(WBC)益处的机制之一。然而,不同的治疗方案、评估自主神经系统所采用的不同方法,尤其是在解释所获得的众多变量方面存在的困难,是理解全身冷刺激对自主神经系统影响的重要障碍。本研究旨在探讨全身冷刺激对心脏自主控制(CAR)的影响,使用自主平衡的单一综合百分位数排名指标(ANSI)进行评估,同时考虑两种不同的全身冷刺激温度和相同的全身冷刺激方案。:采用心率变异性(HRV)评估23名肥胖受试者的自主神经系统,这些受试者接受了10次全身冷刺激,在第一次(T1)和最后一次(T10)刺激时,分别在-55°C下进行2分钟全身冷刺激(15名受试者)或在-110°C下进行2分钟全身冷刺激(8名受试者),并在刺激前后进行研究。为了克服数据解释和年龄/性别偏差方面的一些重要障碍,我们考虑了自主神经系统指数(ANSI),这是一种自主控制的单一综合百分位数排名指标。:我们观察到,无论采用何种温度,心脏自主控制均有改善。两种治疗方法均无差异,在T1和T10时,全身冷刺激治疗后自主神经系统指数均显著增加,且从治疗前到治疗后T1以及从T1到T10总体上,RR间期变异性的总功率均有显著改善。:全身冷刺激能够在自主神经系统控制方面引起即时变化(T1和T10时治疗前与治疗后),并在心脏自主控制方面产生长期调节作用(T1治疗前与T10治疗前)。