Suppr超能文献

评估全身冷冻疗法/冷冻刺激(WBC)的安全风险:国际联盟的范围综述。

Evaluating safety risks of whole-body cryotherapy/cryostimulation (WBC): a scoping review from an international consortium.

机构信息

Laboratoire C2S, EA 6291, Université de Reims Champagne Ardennes, 51100, Reims, France.

Laboratoire Mobilité Vieillissement, Exercice (MOVE), UR 20296, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Université de Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 28;28(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01385-z.

Abstract

Over the two last decades, whole-body cryotherapy/cryostimulation (WBC) has emerged as an exciting non-pharmacological treatment influencing inflammatory events at a cellular and physiological level, which can result in improved sleep quality, faster neuromuscular recovery after high-intensity exercise, and chronic pain relief for patients suffering different types of diseases (fibromyalgia, rheumatism, arthritis). Some evidence even suggests that WBC has benefits on mental health (depression, anxiety disorders) and cognitive functions in both adults and older adults, due to increased circulating BDNF levels. Recently, some safety concerns have been expressed by influential public health authorities (e.g., FDA, INSERM) based on reports from patients who developed adverse events upon or following WBC treatment. However, part of the data used to support these claims involved individuals whose entire body (except head) was exposed to extreme cold vaporized liquid nitrogen while standing in a narrow bathtub. Such a procedure is known as partial-body cryotherapy (PBC), and is often erroneously mistaken to be whole-body cryotherapy. Although having similarities in terms of naming and pursued aims, these two approaches are fundamentally different. The present article reviews the available literature on the main safety concerns associated with the use of true whole-body cryotherapy. English- and French-language reports of empirical studies including case reports, case series, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science electronic databases. Five case reports and two RCTs were included for a total of 16 documented adverse events (AEs). A critical in-depth evaluation of these AEs (type, severity, context of onset, participant's medical background, follow-up) is proposed and used to illustrate that WBC-related safety risks are within acceptable limits and can be proactively prevented by adhering to existing recommendations, contraindications, and commonsense guidelines.

摘要

在过去的二十年中,全身冷冻疗法/冷冻刺激(WBC)作为一种非药物治疗方法,已经在细胞和生理水平上影响炎症反应,从而改善睡眠质量、加快高强度运动后的神经肌肉恢复,并为患有不同类型疾病(纤维肌痛、风湿病、关节炎)的患者缓解慢性疼痛。一些证据甚至表明,WBC 对成年人和老年人的心理健康(抑郁、焦虑障碍)和认知功能有益,这是由于 BDNF 水平的升高。最近,一些有影响力的公共卫生机构(如美国食品药品监督管理局、法国国家健康与医学研究院)对 WBC 治疗后或治疗期间出现不良反应的患者报告表示了一些安全方面的担忧。然而,部分支持这些说法的数据涉及到这样一些个体,他们的整个身体(除头部外)在站在一个狭窄的浴缸中时暴露于极冷的蒸发液氮中。这种过程被称为部分身体冷冻疗法(PBC),并且经常被错误地误认为是全身冷冻疗法。尽管在命名和追求的目标方面有相似之处,但这两种方法在根本上是不同的。本文综述了与使用真正的全身冷冻疗法相关的主要安全问题的现有文献。通过对 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 电子数据库的搜索,确定了包含病例报告、病例系列和随机对照试验(RCT)的英语和法语报告的实证研究。纳入了 5 份病例报告和 2 份 RCT,共记录了 16 例不良事件(AE)。对这些 AE(类型、严重程度、发病情况、参与者的医疗背景、随访)进行了深入的批判性评估,并用来表明,WBC 相关的安全风险在可接受的范围内,可以通过遵守现有的建议、禁忌症和常识性指南来主动预防。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/879a/10537204/65d62195ee52/40001_2023_1385_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验