Torres Armando, Rodríguez-Adanero Concepción, Fernández-Rivera Constantino, Marrero-Miranda Domingo, de Bonis-Redondo Eduardo, Rodríguez-Hernández Aurelio P, Pérez-Tamajón Lourdes, González-Rinne Ana, Álvarez-Sosa Diego, Álvarez-González Alejandra, Sanchez-Dorta Nuria, Pérez-Carreño Estefanía, Díaz-Martín Laura, Luis-Lima Sergio, Rodríguez-Rodríguez Ana E, Vera González Antonia María de, Romero-Delgado Cristina, Calvo-Rodríguez María, Seijo-Bestilleiro Rocío, Rodríguez-Jiménez Consuelo, Prieto López Manuel Arturo, Rivero-González Antonio Manuel, Hernández-Marrero Domingo, Porrini Esteban
Nephrology Service, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 La Laguna, Spain.
Instituto de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB), Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 20;13(24):7802. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247802.
: Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and prediabetes (PreDM) are common after renal transplantation and increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Compared to immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), the LCPT formulation, with delayed absorption, offers higher bioavailability and a smoother time-concentration curve, potentially reducing beta-cell stress. : This randomized pilot trial compared de novo immunosuppression with IR-Tac (twice daily) and LCPT (once daily). At-risk recipients (age ≥ 60 years or 18-59 years with metabolic syndrome) were enrolled and followed for 3 months. The primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of PTDM and PreDM, respectively. : 27 patients were randomized to IR-Tac and 25 to LCPT. The incidence of PTDM was comparable between groups [IR Tac: 18.5% (95% CI: 8.2-36.7%) vs. LCPT: 24% (95% CI: 11.5-43.4%); = 0.7]. Although not statistically significant, the LCPT group exhibited a trend toward a reduction in PreDM incidence [IR-Tac: 40.7% (95% CI: 25-59%) vs. LCPT: 20% (95% CI: 9-39%); = 0.1]. A sensitivity analysis showed similar results, with no significant differences in cumulative corticosteroid doses or baseline body mass index (BMI) between groups. The LCPT group showed a trend toward higher tacrolimus exposure at the end of the study [trough levels: IR-Tac group 8.3 (6.9-9.2) vs. LCPT group 9.4 (7.4-11.4) ng/mL; = 0.05)], as well as fewer acute rejection episodes (none vs. three). Delayed graft function was more common in the IR-Tac group (37% vs. 8%; = 0.01), and the eGFR was lower. Adverse events were comparable between groups. : The potential biological activity of LCPT in preventing glucose metabolic alterations in at-risk patients warrants further investigation.
肾移植后移植后糖尿病(PTDM)和糖尿病前期(PreDM)很常见,会增加心血管事件和死亡风险。与速释他克莫司(IR-Tac)相比,具有延迟吸收特性的长效他克莫司(LCPT)制剂具有更高的生物利用度和更平滑的时间-浓度曲线,可能会减轻β细胞应激。
这项随机试点试验比较了使用IR-Tac(每日两次)和LCPT(每日一次)进行的初始免疫抑制。纳入有风险的受者(年龄≥60岁或患有代谢综合征的18-59岁患者)并随访3个月。主要和次要结局分别是PTDM和PreDM的发生率。
27例患者被随机分配至IR-Tac组,25例被分配至LCPT组。两组间PTDM的发生率相当[IR-Tac组:18.5%(95%CI:8.2-36.7%) vs. LCPT组:24%(95%CI:11.5-43.4%);P = 0.7]。虽然无统计学意义,但LCPT组的PreDM发生率有降低趋势[IR-Tac组:40.7%(95%CI: