Gehrke Leon, Gonçalves Vasco Dos Reis, Andrae Dominik, Rasko Tamas, Ho Patrick, Einsele Hermann, Hudecek Michael, Friedel Sabrina R
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II und Lehrstuhl für Zelluläre Immuntherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Fraunhofer-Institut für Zelltherapie und Immunologie, Außenstelle Zelluläre Immuntherapie, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 21;25(24):13685. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413685.
The successful application of CAR-T cells in the treatment of hematologic malignancies has fundamentally changed cancer therapy. With increasing numbers of registered CAR-T cell clinical trials, efforts are being made to streamline and reduce the costs of CAR-T cell manufacturing while improving their safety. To date, all approved CAR-T cell products have relied on viral-based gene delivery and genomic integration methods. While viral vectors offer high transfection efficiencies, concerns regarding potential malignant transformation coupled with costly and time-consuming vector manufacturing are constant drivers in the search for cheaper, easier-to-use, safer, and more efficient alternatives. In this review, we examine different non-viral gene transfer methods as alternatives for CAR-T cell production, their advantages and disadvantages, and examples of their applications. Transposon-based gene transfer methods lead to stable but non-targeted gene integration, are easy to handle, and achieve high gene transfer rates. Programmable endonucleases allow targeted integration, reducing the potential risk of integration-mediated malignant transformation of CAR-T cells. Non-integrating CAR-encoding vectors avoid this risk completely and achieve only transient CAR expression. With these promising alternative techniques for gene transfer, all avenues are open to fully exploiting the potential of next-generation CAR-T cell therapy and applying it in a wide range of applications.
嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)在血液系统恶性肿瘤治疗中的成功应用从根本上改变了癌症治疗方式。随着注册的CAR-T细胞临床试验数量不断增加,人们正在努力简化CAR-T细胞制造流程并降低成本,同时提高其安全性。迄今为止,所有获批的CAR-T细胞产品都依赖基于病毒的基因递送和基因组整合方法。虽然病毒载体具有较高的转染效率,但对潜在恶性转化的担忧,以及昂贵且耗时的载体生产,一直推动着人们寻找更便宜、更易用、更安全且更高效的替代方法。在这篇综述中,我们研究了不同的非病毒基因转移方法作为CAR-T细胞生产的替代方案、它们的优缺点及其应用实例。基于转座子的基因转移方法可实现稳定但非靶向的基因整合,易于操作,并能达到较高的基因转移率。可编程核酸内切酶可实现靶向整合,降低CAR-T细胞整合介导的恶性转化的潜在风险。非整合型CAR编码载体完全避免了这种风险,仅实现CAR的瞬时表达。有了这些有前景的基因转移替代技术,所有途径都为充分挖掘下一代CAR-T细胞疗法的潜力并将其应用于广泛领域敞开了大门。