Zimerer Carla, Alves Sabrina Pereira, Khéde Raquel Casagrande, Rufo-Tavares Weverton, Carletti Luciana, Vancini Rodrigo Luiz, Perez Anselmo José, Leite Richard Diego Leite
Department of Sports, Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil.
Department of Sports, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil.
J Chiropr Med. 2024 Dec;23(4):186-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dynamic distribution of training loads in a kettlebell program and evaluate its effects on muscle strength and aerobic capacity.
Fourteen recreationally active women with no kettlebell training experience (age: 25.86 ± 5.35 years; V̇Omax = 35.14 ± 5.58 mL/kg/min; body mass = 62.13 ± 13.40 kg; height = 164.75 ± 5.77 cm; body mass index = 22.68 ± 3.99 kg/m²) completed a 10-week kettlebell training program. The kettlebell training program was divided into three phases: Phase I (2 weeks), phase II (4 weeks), and Phase III (4 weeks). Maximum muscle strength (1RM) and aerobic fitness (V̇Omax) measurements were performed before (Pre) and after (Post) training. The external and internal loads were represented by the session's total volume and perceived exertion method.
An increase in maximum strength ( < .001; % = 23.73; effect size = 0.87) and V̇Omax ( = .004; % = 9.63; effect size = 0.57) was observed when comparing Pre and Post measurements. There was an increase in total volume when phases I and II ( < .001), phases I and III ( < .001), and phases II and III ( < .001) of the training were compared. The internal load values increased significantly between phases I and II ( < .001). However, there was no difference when comparing phases II and III ( = .796).
The total volume increases during the training phases, and the training load was similar in phases II and III. Furthermore, were observed higher V̇Omax and strength (1 RM load) values.
本研究旨在描述壶铃训练计划中训练负荷的动态分布,并评估其对肌肉力量和有氧能力的影响。
14名无壶铃训练经验的休闲活跃女性(年龄:25.86±5.35岁;最大摄氧量=35.14±5.58毫升/千克/分钟;体重=62.13±13.40千克;身高=164.75±5.77厘米;体重指数=22.68±3.99千克/平方米)完成了一项为期10周的壶铃训练计划。壶铃训练计划分为三个阶段:第一阶段(2周)、第二阶段(4周)和第三阶段(4周)。在训练前(Pre)和训练后(Post)进行最大肌肉力量(1RM)和有氧适能(最大摄氧量)测量。外部和内部负荷分别用训练课的总体积和主观用力程度法表示。
比较训练前和训练后的测量结果时,观察到最大力量增加(P<.001;百分比=23.73;效应量=0.87)和最大摄氧量增加(P=.004;百分比=9.63;效应量=0.57)。比较训练的第一阶段和第二阶段(P<.001)、第一阶段和第三阶段(P<.001)以及第二阶段和第三阶段(P<.001)时,总体积增加。第一阶段和第二阶段之间的内部负荷值显著增加(P<.001)。然而,比较第二阶段和第三阶段时没有差异(P=.796)。
训练阶段总体积增加,第二阶段和第三阶段的训练负荷相似。此外,观察到更高的最大摄氧量和力量(1RM负荷)值。