Racicot Karen, Sakkas Denny, Barrett Brent C, Chiang Kenneth, Jenkins Charles
Quest Diagnostics, Secaucus, New Jersey.
ReproSource, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
F S Rep. 2024 Oct 22;5(4):378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.10.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.
To validate a mail-in delayed semen analysis service using deidentified remnant samples from a US fertility clinic.
Double-blinded prospective validation of screening/diagnostic test.
Fertility clinic and clinical reference laboratory.
Deidentified remnant samples from patients attending fertility clinic for fertility assessment (study A, n = 68; study B, n = 232).
None.
Total motility, concentration, and morphology (Kruger, strict) measures were compared between split semen specimens that underwent comprehensive semen analysis at <1 hour (referent) and 26 hours (experimental). The concordance between the paired measures was described using coefficient of variance and percent bias. Clinical concordance (CC) between 1- and 26-hour results for total motility, concentration, and morphology measures was also reported, using the fifth centile clinical reference ranges described in the World Health Organization manual (fifth edition).
In a controlled laboratory setting (study A), total motility, concentration, and morphology measures were highly consistent between the 1- and 26-hour analyses, with mean coefficients of variation (%CVs) of 9.0% for total motility, 4.0% for concentration, and 3.0% for morphology. There were also high CC rates: 94.2% for total motility; 100% for concentration; and 98.5% for morphology. In a real-world setting (study B), which included commercial shipment of specimens, the mean %CVs for total motility and concentration were 15% and 27%, respectively, which were more variable than those in study A yet still considerably less variable than that measured between laboratories using College of Anatomical Pathologist proficiency testing during the study period (motility %CV, 31%; concentration %CV, 37%). These comparisons also had high CC rates for total motility (86%) and concentration (93.1%).
These results demonstrate the validation of a laboratory service that provides accurate, comprehensive semen analysis on specimens collected remotely and shipped overnight to a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
利用美国一家生育诊所的去识别化剩余样本,验证一项邮寄式延迟精液分析服务。
筛查/诊断测试的双盲前瞻性验证。
生育诊所和临床参考实验室。
来自前往生育诊所进行生育评估患者的去识别化剩余样本(研究A,n = 68;研究B,n = 232)。
无。
比较在<1小时(对照)和26小时(实验)进行全面精液分析的分割精液标本之间的总活力、浓度和形态(克鲁格,严格)指标。使用变异系数和偏差百分比描述配对指标之间的一致性。还报告了总活力、浓度和形态指标在1小时和26小时结果之间的临床一致性(CC),采用世界卫生组织手册(第五版)中描述的第五百分位数临床参考范围。
在受控实验室环境中(研究A),1小时和26小时分析之间的总活力、浓度和形态指标高度一致,总活力的平均变异系数(%CVs)为9.0%,浓度为4.0%,形态为3.0%。CC率也很高:总活力为94.2%;浓度为100%;形态为98.5%。在包括标本商业运输的实际环境中(研究B),总活力和浓度的平均%CVs分别为15%和27%,比研究A中的更具变异性,但仍远低于研究期间使用解剖病理学家学会能力验证测试在不同实验室之间测量的变异性(活力%CV,31%;浓度%CV,37%)。这些比较中总活力(86%)和浓度(93.1%)的CC率也很高。
这些结果证明了一项实验室服务的有效性,该服务能对远程采集并隔夜运送到临床诊断实验室的标本进行准确、全面的精液分析。