Cao Xing-Wu, Lin Kai, Li Cui-Ying, Yuan Chang-Wei
Department of Andrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Bejing 100029, China.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2011 Dec;17(12):1059-63.
This paper presents a review of the contribution, revision and defects of the 5th edition of WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen published in 2010. The pity is that the book lacks the data from China. The normal spermatozoon morphology as 4% seems incredible and hard to be applied in practice. The reference values provided by WHO are important records of past findings, but do not hold good for all time. The Manual cannot be looked upon as a "Bible" but a new starting point. It is an inescapable responsibility of Chinese andrologists to establish a set of criteria for human semen analysis specifically applicable to Chinese males.
本文对2010年出版的世界卫生组织《人类精液检查与处理实验室手册》第5版的贡献、修订内容及缺陷进行了综述。遗憾的是,该书缺乏来自中国的数据。正常精子形态为4%这一数据似乎令人难以置信,且难以在实际中应用。世界卫生组织提供的参考值是过去研究结果的重要记录,但并非永远适用。该手册不能被视为“圣经”,而应是一个新的起点。建立一套专门适用于中国男性的人类精液分析标准是中国男科学工作者不可推卸的责任。