Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚重症监护病房中未插管的新冠肺炎患者的俯卧位通气

Prone positioning of nonintubated patients with COVID-19 in Australian intensive care units.

作者信息

Johnston Barry, Rotherham Hannah, Zhao Peinan, Burrell Aidan, Udy Andrew

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.

Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Nov 22;26(4):241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.08.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of and outcomes from awake prone positioning (APP) in nonintubated patients with COVID-19 in Australian intensive care units (ICUs) in comparison to those who did not receive APP, and to explore the temporal relationship between publication of APP research and changes in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Multicentre, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Seventy-eight Australian ICUs participating in SPRINT-SARI Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to ICU from 27 February 2020 until 30 June 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Proportion of patients receiving APP, rates of invasive ventilation, hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

4711 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 28.6% (1347/4711) underwent APP. Use of APP rapidly increased during the Delta wave and then subsequently declined. Over this period, there were a total of 30 publications on APP. APP patients received a median of 2 (IQR 1-4) days prone positioning, were less unwell (median APACHE-II 13.0 vs. 15.0, p < 0.001), and were less likely to require invasive ventilation (27.9% vs. 34.9%, p < 0.001). Overall, there was no difference in hospital LOS (median 14 vs. 13 days, P = 0.420) or in-hospital mortality (HR 0.95, 0.8-1.11) in those that did and did not receive APP. However, in patients requiring invasive ventilation after their first day in the ICU, not receiving APP was associated with earlier time to intubation (median 1 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and lower adjusted in-hospital mortality (HR 0.70, CI 0.54-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

APP was rapidly adopted into practice within Australian ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic at the same time as a growing number of publications on the topic. A lower frequency of invasive ventilation was noted with APP overall, but in those who eventually required this intervention, APP was associated with greater risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality.

摘要

目的

描述澳大利亚重症监护病房(ICU)中未插管的COVID-19患者使用清醒俯卧位(APP)的情况及结果,并与未接受APP的患者进行比较,同时探讨APP研究发表与临床实践变化之间的时间关系。

设计

多中心观察性队列研究。

设置

78家参与澳大利亚SPRINT-SARI研究的ICU。

参与者

2020年2月27日至2022年6月30日期间入住ICU的确诊COVID-19成年患者。

主要结局指标

接受APP的患者比例、有创通气率、住院时间(LOS)、院内死亡率。

结果

4711例患者纳入分析,其中28.6%(1347/4711)接受了APP。APP的使用在德尔塔波期间迅速增加,随后下降。在此期间,共有30篇关于APP的出版物。接受APP的患者俯卧位的中位时间为2天(IQR 1-4),病情较轻(中位APACHE-II评分13.0对15.0,p<0.001),且需要有创通气的可能性较小(27.9%对34.9%,p<0.001)。总体而言,接受和未接受APP的患者在住院时间(中位14天对13天,P=0.420)或院内死亡率(HR 0.95,0.8-1.11)方面没有差异。然而,在入住ICU第一天后需要有创通气的患者中,未接受APP与更早的插管时间(中位1天对3天,p<0.001)和更低的校正院内死亡率(HR 0.70,CI 0.54-0.90)相关。

结论

在COVID-19大流行期间,澳大利亚ICU迅速将APP应用于实践,与此同时,关于该主题的出版物数量不断增加。总体而言,APP患者有创通气的频率较低,但在最终需要这种干预的患者中,APP与更高的风险调整院内死亡率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ca/11704085/18e0dcfec2f3/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验