Pfitzer Estelle, Bitomsky Laura, Nißen Marcia, Kausch Christoph, Kowatsch Tobias
Centre for Digital Health Interventions, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
MTIP AG, Basel, Switzerland.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e60473. doi: 10.2196/60473.
Over the past decade, digital health technologies (DHTs) have grown rapidly, driven by innovations such as electronic health records and accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased funding and regulatory support have further pushed the sector's expansion. Despite early success, many DHT companies struggle to scale, with notable examples like Pear Therapeutics and Proteus Digital Health, which both declared bankruptcy after initial breakthroughs. These cases highlight the challenges of sustaining growth in a highly regulated health care environment. While there is research on success factors across industries, a gap remains in understanding the specific challenges faced by growth-stage DHT companies.
This study aims to identify and discuss key factors that make growth-stage DHT companies successful. Specifically, we address three questions: (1) What are the success factors of growth-stage digital companies in general and (2) digital health companies in particular? (3) How do these success factors vary across DHTs?
Following established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted to answer the questions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using management and medical literature databases: EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review spanned scientific articles published from 2000 to 2023, using a rigorous screening process and quality assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist.
From the 2972 studies initially screened, 36 were selected, revealing 52 success factors. We categorized them into internal factor categories (Product and Services, Operations, Business Models, and Team Composition) and external factor categories (Customers, Health Care System, Government and Regulators, Investors and Shareholders, Suppliers and Partners, and Competitors). Of the 52 factors, 19 were specific to DHT companies. The most frequently cited internal success factors included financial viability (n=18) and market demand and relevance of the product and service (n=13). External success factors emphasized the regulatory environment and policy framework (n=15). Key differences were observed between DHTs and broader digital companies in areas such as data security (P=.03), system interoperability (P=.01), and regulatory alignment (P=.02), with DHTs showing a higher frequency of these factors. In addition, success factors varied across different DHT categories. Health System Operational Software companies emphasized affordability and system integration, while Digital Therapeutics prioritized factors related to government regulations and regulatory approval.
Essential characteristics contributing to the success of growth-stage digital health companies have been identified. This work, therefore, fills a knowledge gap and provides relevant stakeholders, including investors and entrepreneurs, with a valuable resource that can support informed decision-making in investment decisions and, in turn, enhance the success of fast-growing digital health companies. In addition, it provides the research community with a direction for future studies, enhancing the understanding, implementation, and growth of DHTs.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1101/2024.05.06.24306674.
在过去十年中,数字健康技术(DHTs)迅速发展,受到电子健康记录等创新的推动,并在新冠疫情的加速下进一步发展。资金投入增加和监管支持进一步推动了该领域的扩张。尽管取得了早期成功,但许多DHT公司在扩大规模方面仍面临困难,例如Pear Therapeutics和Proteus Digital Health等著名案例,它们在取得初步突破后都宣布破产。这些案例凸显了在高度监管的医疗保健环境中维持增长的挑战。虽然有针对各行业成功因素的研究,但在理解成长阶段的DHT公司所面临的具体挑战方面仍存在差距。
本研究旨在识别和讨论使成长阶段的DHT公司取得成功的关键因素。具体而言,我们解决三个问题:(1)一般而言,成长阶段的数字公司,特别是(2)数字健康公司的成功因素有哪些?(3)这些成功因素在不同的DHT之间如何变化?
遵循既定的PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,进行了一项系统的文献综述以回答这些问题。使用管理和医学文献数据库进行了全面的文献检索:EBSCO、ProQuest、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。该综述涵盖了2000年至2023年发表的科学文章,采用了严格的筛选过程,并使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)清单进行质量评估。
从最初筛选的2972项研究中,选出了36项,揭示了52个成功因素。我们将它们分为内部因素类别(产品与服务、运营、商业模式和团队构成)和外部因素类别(客户、医疗保健系统、政府与监管机构、投资者与股东、供应商与合作伙伴以及竞争对手)。在这52个因素中,有19个是DHT公司特有的。最常被提及的内部成功因素包括财务可行性(n = 18)以及产品和服务的市场需求与相关性(n = 13)。外部成功因素强调监管环境和政策框架(n = 15)。在数据安全(P = 0.03)、系统互操作性(P = 0.01)和监管一致性(P = 0.02)等领域,观察到DHT与更广泛的数字公司之间存在关键差异,DHT中这些因素的出现频率更高。此外,成功因素在不同的DHT类别中也有所不同。卫生系统运营软件公司强调可承受性和系统集成,而数字疗法则优先考虑与政府法规和监管批准相关的因素。
已确定了有助于成长阶段数字健康公司成功的基本特征。因此,这项工作填补了知识空白,并为包括投资者和企业家在内的相关利益者提供了宝贵资源,可支持投资决策中的明智决策,进而提高快速发展的数字健康公司的成功率。此外,它为研究界提供了未来研究的方向,增进了对DHTs的理解、实施和发展。
国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):RR2 - 10.1101/2024.05.06.24306674。