• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注结果,而非过程:持续注意力过程中视觉表现的元认知监控

Product, not process: Metacognitive monitoring of visual performance during sustained attention.

作者信息

Kim Cheongil, Chong Sang Chul

机构信息

Graduate Program in Cognitive Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1443-1455. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02635-9. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-024-02635-9
PMID:39789201
Abstract

The performance of the human visual system exhibits moment-to-moment fluctuations influenced by multiple neurocognitive factors. To deal with this instability of the visual system, introspective awareness of current visual performance (metacognitive monitoring) may be crucial. In this study, we investigate whether and how people can monitor their own visual performance during sustained attention by adopting confidence judgments as indicators of metacognitive monitoring - assuming that if participants can monitor visual performance, confidence judgments will accurately track performance fluctuations. In two experiments (N 40), we found that participants were able to monitor fluctuations in visual performance during sustained attention. Importantly, metacognitive monitoring largely relied on the quality of target perception, a product of visual processing ("I lack confidence in my performance because I only caught a glimpse of the target"), rather than the states of the visual system during visual processing ("I lack confidence because I was not focusing on the task").

摘要

人类视觉系统的表现呈现出受多种神经认知因素影响的瞬间波动。为应对视觉系统的这种不稳定性,对当前视觉表现的内省意识(元认知监测)可能至关重要。在本研究中,我们探究人们是否以及如何能够通过采用信心判断作为元认知监测指标,在持续注意力过程中监测自身的视觉表现——假设如果参与者能够监测视觉表现,信心判断将准确跟踪表现波动。在两项实验(N = 40)中,我们发现参与者能够在持续注意力过程中监测视觉表现的波动。重要的是,元认知监测很大程度上依赖于目标感知的质量,这是视觉处理的产物(“我对自己的表现缺乏信心,因为我只是瞥见了目标”),而不是视觉处理过程中视觉系统的状态(“我缺乏信心是因为我没有专注于任务”)。

相似文献

1
Product, not process: Metacognitive monitoring of visual performance during sustained attention.关注结果,而非过程:持续注意力过程中视觉表现的元认知监控
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1443-1455. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02635-9. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.元认知判断背后的特定领域和一般领域过程。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:264-277. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.乐观的元认知判断预测在相对复杂的视觉任务中表现不佳。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Sep;74:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102781. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
Are errors detected before they occur? Early error sensations revealed by metacognitive judgments on the timing of error awareness.是否能在错误发生之前检测到错误?通过对错误意识时间的元认知判断揭示的早期错误感觉。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102857. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102857. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Metacognition of visuomotor decisions in conversion disorder.转换障碍中视觉运动决策的元认知。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:251-265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
6
Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.确信即确信:前额叶振荡支持决策的元认知监控。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):781-789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1612-16.2016.
7
Evidence for metacognitive bias in perception of voluntary action.对自愿行为知觉的元认知偏差的证据。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104041. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104041. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Consistency, not speed: temporal regularity as a metacognitive cue.一致性,而非速度:时间规律性作为元认知线索。
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):88-98. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0973-z. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Unskilled but subjectively aware: Metacognitive monitoring ability and respective awareness in low-performing students.技能不足但主观上有觉知:低学业成绩学生的元认知监控能力及相应的觉知
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):229-41. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0552-0.
10
Asymmetrical monitoring of subjective asynchronies: a metacognitive generalized STEARC effect.主观异步性的不对称监测:一种元认知广义STEARC效应。
Psychol Res. 2025 Apr 28;89(3):96. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02123-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Metacognition of perceptual resolution across and around the visual field.跨视野和围绕视野的感知分辨率的元认知。
Cognition. 2024 Dec;253:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105938. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
The future of metacognition research: Balancing construct breadth with measurement rigor.元认知研究的未来:在构建广度和测量严谨性之间取得平衡。
Cortex. 2024 Feb;171:223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis.元认知与信心:回顾与综合。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2024 Jan 18;75:241-268. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
4
Confidence in consciousness research.对意识研究的信心。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Mar;14(2):e1628. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1628. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Default mode network mediates low-frequency fluctuations in brain activity and behavior during sustained attention.默认模式网络介导了持续注意期间大脑活动和行为的低频波动。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Dec 15;43(18):5478-5489. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26024. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Examining the robustness of the relationship between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitive bias.考察元认知效率与元认知偏差之间关系的稳健性。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Oct;95:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103196. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Models of sustained attention.持续注意力模型。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
The disentanglement of the neural and experiential complexity of self-generated thoughts: A users guide to combining experience sampling with neuroimaging data.自我产生思维的神经和体验复杂性的解缠:结合经验取样与神经影像学数据的用户指南。
Neuroimage. 2019 May 15;192:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.034. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Visual Confidence.视觉自信
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 14;2:459-481. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
10
Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research.近期持续性注意力研究在理论、神经学及临床方面取得的进展。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 May;1396(1):70-91. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13318. Epub 2017 Mar 5.