• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸外科医生对虚弱和术前康复的认知:一项全国性调查的结果

Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey.

作者信息

Kent Johnathan R, Chavez Julia, Rubin Daniel, Gleason Lauren J, Landi Andrea, Huisingh-Scheetz Megan, Bryan Darren S, Ferguson Mark K, Donington Jessica, Madariaga Maria Lucia

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Jan 20;2(3):581-585. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.12.012. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.atssr.2023.12.012
PMID:39790415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11708733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. How thoracic surgeons recognize, measure, and mitigate frailty in their daily clinical practice is unknown. We administered a national survey to determine the current practices of thoracic surgeons managing frail patients.

METHODS

A 144-question survey developed in collaboration with the University of Chicago Survey Lab was sent to CTSnet.org members who identified as general thoracic surgeons, practiced in the United States, and had publicly available emails. Responses were collected from August 12 to September 11, 2022. Both fully and partially (at least 20%) completed surveys were included in a descriptive statistical analysis.

RESULTS

After 2796 surveys were administered, 342 surgeons responded. Surgeons were in practice a median of 23 years (range, 1-50 years) at academic (63.4% [187/295]) or community (36.6% [108/295]) centers. Most surgeons believed it important to assess frailty preoperatively (83.9% [287/342]), but only 28% (97/342) of surgeons performed routine frailty assessment. Barriers to routine frailty assessment included lack of tools (80.0% [32/40]), training (59.0% [23/39]), and staffing (56.4% [22/39]). Whereas most surgeons believed that frailty could be mitigated (72.2% [247/342]), only 49.5% (156/315) prescribed prehabilitation. Up to 78.7% (203/263) of surgeons would delay or cancel surgery for patient frailty, depending on disease cause.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic surgeons recognize that frailty is an established risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality; however, there is high variability in diagnosis and management of frailty. Guidelines are needed to establish best practices for screening and mitigation to optimally treat frail patients.

摘要

背景

衰弱与围手术期发病率和死亡率增加相关。胸外科医生在日常临床实践中如何识别、测量和减轻衰弱尚不清楚。我们进行了一项全国性调查,以确定胸外科医生管理衰弱患者的当前做法。

方法

与芝加哥大学调查实验室合作开发的一项包含144个问题的调查问卷被发送给CTSnet.org的成员,这些成员被认定为普通胸外科医生,在美国执业,且有公开可用的电子邮件。于2022年8月12日至9月11日收集回复。完整和部分(至少20%)完成的调查问卷都纳入描述性统计分析。

结果

在发放2796份调查问卷后,有342名外科医生做出回复。外科医生在学术(63.4%[187/295])或社区(36.6%[108/295])中心的执业年限中位数为23年(范围为1 - 50年)。大多数外科医生认为术前评估衰弱很重要(83.9%[287/342]),但只有28%(97/342)的外科医生进行常规衰弱评估。常规衰弱评估的障碍包括缺乏工具(80.0%[32/40])、培训(59.0%[23/39])和人员配备(56.4%[22/39])。虽然大多数外科医生认为衰弱可以减轻(72.2%[247/342]),但只有49.5%(156/315)的医生开了术前康复的处方。高达78.7%(203/263)的外科医生会根据疾病原因,因患者衰弱而推迟或取消手术。

结论

胸外科医生认识到衰弱是围手术期发病率和死亡率的既定危险因素;然而,在衰弱的诊断和管理方面存在很大差异。需要制定指南来确立筛查和减轻衰弱的最佳实践,以优化对衰弱患者的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990a/11708733/7f2f8d43fd04/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990a/11708733/b46826a90039/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990a/11708733/7f2f8d43fd04/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990a/11708733/b46826a90039/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/990a/11708733/7f2f8d43fd04/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey.胸外科医生对虚弱和术前康复的认知:一项全国性调查的结果
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Jan 20;2(3):581-585. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.12.012. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Do Surgeons Experience Moral Dissonance When There Is Misalignment Between Evidence and Action? A Survey and Scenario-based Study.当证据与行动不一致时,外科医生会经历道德失调吗?一项基于调查和情景的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):217-224. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003220. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial differences in phenotypic frailty assessment among general thoracic surgery patients.普通胸外科患者表型衰弱评估中的种族差异。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Nov 7;16:1049-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.001. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Gender Bias in Judging Frailty and Fitness for Lung Surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Feb;115(2):356-361. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.013. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
Definition and assessment of high risk in patients considered for lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert panel consensus document.Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌行肺叶切除术患者高危因素的定义和评估:美国胸外科学会专家组共识文件。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;162(6):1605-1618.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
Association of Frailty and Postoperative Complications With Unplanned Readmissions After Elective Outpatient Surgery.虚弱与术后并发症与择期门诊手术后非计划性再入院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194330. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4330.
5
Frailty Cost: Economic Impact of Frailty in the Elective Surgical Patient.虚弱的代价:择期手术患者虚弱的经济影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jun;228(6):861-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
6
Frailty and pre-frailty in middle-aged and older adults and its association with multimorbidity and mortality: a prospective analysis of 493 737 UK Biobank participants.中年和老年人的虚弱和衰弱及其与多种疾病和死亡率的关系:对 493737 名英国生物库参与者的前瞻性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e323-e332. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30091-4. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
7
Screening for Frailty in Thoracic Surgical Patients.胸外科手术患者的衰弱筛查
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar;103(3):956-961. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.078. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.衰弱作为预测老年患者手术结果的指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
9
Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.老年人的衰弱:一种表型的证据。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.