• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.基于术中事件的梯度提升算法实现冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的动态风险预测:改善风险预测。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
Machine learning model-based risk prediction of severe complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.基于机器学习模型的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后严重并发症风险预测
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023 Feb;32(2):185-194. doi: 10.17219/acem/152895.
3
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following suprainguinal bypass.使用机器学习预测腹股沟上旁路术后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):593-608.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.09.037. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Pre-operative and intraoperative determinants for prolonged ventilation following adult cardiac surgery.成人心脏手术后长时间通气的术前和术中决定因素。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Feb;56(2):190-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02538.x. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
5
Unraveling the impact of time-dependent perioperative variables on 30-day readmission after coronary artery bypass surgery.探讨围手术期时间依赖性变量对冠状动脉旁路移植术后 30 天再入院的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Sep;164(3):943-955.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.076. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Predictive Utility of a Machine Learning Algorithm in Estimating Mortality Risk in Cardiac Surgery.机器学习算法在心脏手术死亡率预测中的应用价值。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):1811-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.049. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Long-Term Survival Prediction for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Validation of the ASCERT Model Compared With The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality.冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期生存预测:ASCERT 模型与胸外科医师学会死亡率预测风险的验证比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1336-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.045. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes and Cost by Phase of Care After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.机器学习预测冠状动脉旁路移植术后各阶段的预后和成本。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Sep;114(3):711-719. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.040. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
9
Using machine learning to predict outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.使用机器学习预测颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Oct;78(4):973-987.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.024. Epub 2023 May 20.
10
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With National Cardiovascular Data Registry Models for Prediction of Risk of Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.机器学习方法与国家心血管数据注册模型预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后出血风险的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196835. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6835.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a dynamic model to estimate evolving risk of major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.构建用于评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后大出血风险动态变化的模型。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 25;4(6):e0000906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000906. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Machine learning-based hybrid risk estimation system (ERES) in cardiac surgery: Supplementary insights from the ASA score analysis.心脏手术中基于机器学习的混合风险评估系统(ERES):美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分分析的补充见解
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 23;4(6):e0000889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000889. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Adverse Events after Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术后不良事件的机器学习模型的开发与验证
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 25:2025.02.24.25322811. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.24.25322811.
4
Predictive Analytics in Cardiothoracic Care: Enhancing Outcomes with the Healthcare Enabled by Artificial Intelligence in Real Time (HEART) Project.心胸护理中的预测分析:通过实时人工智能支持的医疗保健(HEART)项目改善治疗效果
J Maine Med Cent. 2024 Summer;6(2). doi: 10.46804/2641-2225.1195. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.术中特征改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后模型风险预测
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Mar 7;2(3):336-340. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.005. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Validation of machine learning-based risk stratification scores for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者基于机器学习的风险分层评分的验证
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 Sep 26;5(6):702-711. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae071. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Tailoring Risk Prediction Models to Local Populations.针对当地人群定制风险预测模型。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Nov 1;9(11):1018-1028. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2912.
8
Multiple Layers of Care and Risk: Comparing Cross-Specialty Outcomes Using Regional, Hospital, and Patient-Level Data.多层护理与风险:利用区域、医院和患者层面数据比较跨专业结果
JACC Adv. 2022 Oct 28;1(4):100115. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100115. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Performance Drift in Machine Learning Models for Cardiac Surgery Risk Prediction: Retrospective Analysis.用于心脏手术风险预测的机器学习模型中的性能漂移:回顾性分析
JMIRx Med. 2024 Jun 12;5:e45973. doi: 10.2196/45973.
10
The high-risk features among patients undergoing mitral valve operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation: The 3-strike score.缺血性二尖瓣反流患者行二尖瓣手术的高危特征:三击评分
JTCVS Open. 2024 Mar 5;18:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.017. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With National Cardiovascular Data Registry Models for Prediction of Risk of Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.机器学习方法与国家心血管数据注册模型预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后出血风险的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196835. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6835.
3
Tapping Into Underutilized Healthcare Data in Clinical Research.
Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):227-229. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003329.
4
Development and Validation of a Deep-Learning Model to Screen for Hyperkalemia From the Electrocardiogram.开发和验证一种基于深度学习的心电图预测高钾血症的模型。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):428-436. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0640.
5
Enhancing the prediction of acute kidney injury risk after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning techniques: A retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习技术提高经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤风险的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002703. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1-Background, Design Considerations, and Model Development.美国胸外科医师学会 2018 年成人心脏外科学风险模型:第 1 部分——背景、设计考虑因素和模型开发。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1411-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Deep Patient: An Unsupervised Representation to Predict the Future of Patients from the Electronic Health Records.深度患者:一种从电子健康记录中预测患者未来的无监督表示。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26094. doi: 10.1038/srep26094.
8
Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.胸外科医师协会成人心脏手术数据库的渗透率、完整性和代表性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):33-41; discussion 41. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.055. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
9
The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): a Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets.净重新分类指数(NRI):即使使用独立测试数据集,也是一种误导性的预测改善衡量指标。
Stat Biosci. 2015 Oct 1;7(2):282-295. doi: 10.1007/s12561-014-9118-0. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
10
Disrupting Electronic Health Records Systems: The Next Generation.破坏电子健康记录系统:下一代
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Oct 23;3(4):e34. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4192.

基于术中事件的梯度提升算法实现冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的动态风险预测:改善风险预测。

Toward Dynamic Risk Prediction of Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Improving Risk Prediction With Intraoperative Events Using Gradient Boosting.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, CT (M.M., T.J.S.D., C.H., B.J.M., R.A.J, A.C., W.L.S., H.M.K).

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.M., A.G.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun;14(6):e007363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007363
PMID:34078100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8635167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative data may improve models predicting postoperative events. We evaluated the effect of incorporating intraoperative variables to the existing preoperative model on the predictive performance of the model for coronary artery bypass graft.

METHODS

We analyzed 378 572 isolated coronary artery bypass graft cases performed across 1083 centers, using the national Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes were operative mortality, 5 postoperative complications, and composite representation of all events. We fitted models by logistic regression or extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). For each modeling approach, we used preoperative only, intraoperative only, or pre+intraoperative variables. We developed 84 models with unique combinations of the 3 variable sets, 2 variable selection methods, 2 modeling approaches, and 7 outcomes. Each model was tested in 20 iterations of 70:30 stratified random splitting into development/testing samples. Model performances were evaluated on the testing dataset using the C statistic, area under the precision-recall curve, and calibration metrics, including the Brier score.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 65.3 years, and 24.7% were women. Operative mortality, excluding intraoperative death, occurred in 1.9%. In all outcomes, models that considered pre+intraoperative variables demonstrated significantly improved Brier score and area under the precision-recall curve compared with models considering pre or intraoperative variables alone. XGBoost without external variable selection had the best C statistics, Brier score, and area under the precision-recall curve values in 4 of the 7 outcomes (mortality, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and composite) compared with logistic regression models with or without variable selection. Based on the calibration plots, risk restratification for mortality showed that the logistic regression model underestimated the risk in 11 114 patients (9.8%) and overestimated in 12 005 patients (10.6%). In contrast, the XGBoost model underestimated the risk in 7218 patients (6.4%) and overestimated in 0 patients (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In isolated coronary artery bypass graft, adding intraoperative variables to preoperative variables resulted in improved predictions of all 7 outcomes. Risk models based on XGBoost may provide a better prediction of adverse events to guide clinical care.

摘要

背景

术中数据可能会提高预测术后事件的模型的准确性。我们评估了将术中变量纳入现有术前模型对冠状动脉旁路移植术模型预测性能的影响。

方法

我们分析了 2014 年至 2016 年间,全国胸外科医师学会成人心脏手术数据库中 1083 个中心进行的 378572 例独立冠状动脉旁路移植术病例。结果为手术死亡率、5 种术后并发症和所有事件的综合表现。我们使用逻辑回归或极端梯度提升(XGBoost)进行模型拟合。对于每种建模方法,我们使用术前变量、术中变量或术前+术中变量。我们使用 3 组变量、2 种变量选择方法、2 种建模方法和 7 种结果的独特组合,开发了 84 个模型。每个模型在 20 次 70:30 分层随机拆分到开发/测试样本中进行测试。使用测试数据集上的 C 统计量、精度-召回曲线下面积和校准指标(包括 Brier 评分)评估模型性能。

结果

患者平均年龄为 65.3 岁,24.7%为女性。手术死亡率(不包括术中死亡)为 1.9%。在所有结果中,与仅考虑术前或术中变量的模型相比,考虑术前+术中变量的模型的 Brier 评分和精度-召回曲线下面积明显提高。在 7 种结果中的 4 种(死亡率、肾衰竭、延长通气和复合)中,不进行外部变量选择的 XGBoost 具有最佳的 C 统计量、Brier 评分和精度-召回曲线下面积值,而具有或不具有变量选择的逻辑回归模型。基于校准图,死亡率的风险再分层表明,逻辑回归模型低估了 11114 名患者(9.8%)的风险,高估了 12005 名患者(10.6%)的风险。相比之下,XGBoost 模型低估了 7218 名患者(6.4%)的风险,而没有高估任何患者(0%)的风险。

结论

在独立冠状动脉旁路移植术中,将术中变量添加到术前变量中可提高对所有 7 种结果的预测能力。基于 XGBoost 的风险模型可能会更好地预测不良事件,以指导临床护理。